HOME | DD

VeraAda β€” dissolved

Published: 2010-02-02 17:22:12 +0000 UTC; Views: 4874; Favourites: 229; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description Double exposure with bokeh, taken in October.
The girl on the floor is ~xeloquencex

Nikon FM2 + Fuji X-tra 400 ISO = double exposure - scan from print.




Β© VΓ©ra Ada Daye. All rights reserved. My images may not be reproduced in any form without my permission.
Related content
Comments: 51

VeraAda In reply to ??? [2011-03-14 16:03:26 +0000 UTC]

thanks so much

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

perpetual-arrhythmia [2011-01-24 14:18:57 +0000 UTC]

Π’ΠΎΡ‚ эта супСр!..

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

VeraAda In reply to perpetual-arrhythmia [2011-01-26 00:17:42 +0000 UTC]

spasibo!
rada chto tebe nravitsya

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

perpetual-arrhythmia In reply to VeraAda [2011-01-26 10:00:19 +0000 UTC]

^.^

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

da5nsy [2010-08-02 08:31:06 +0000 UTC]

It impressed at how you managed to limit the double exposure factor to just the out of focus light... well done

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

VeraAda In reply to da5nsy [2010-08-02 10:51:51 +0000 UTC]

Well, I think the reason that the only visible texture is the bokeh is because I took the texture shots at night on the road - so only the brightest aspect showed up once I took the photos of the girls. I guess if the second exposures were also taken at night then more of the texture would've shown through.

Thanks for your comment, I appreciate the support!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

da5nsy In reply to VeraAda [2010-08-05 10:31:54 +0000 UTC]

Fair enough, I might have to try that, I'm always a little scared of double exposures (I mean what if I end up taking an awesome photo and overlaying a really rubbish one on to it, major regret...) so this I might go this way and ease myself gently into it! haha
Just a Little bit of double exposure...
Love it

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

VeraAda In reply to da5nsy [2010-08-06 07:19:05 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, you should definitely try it!
I understand being scared about it, it's partially why I always have at LEAST 2 cameras on me (always the DSLR), more often I even take 3. I like to have back up images in different formats.
But double exposure gets easier the more you do it (as with most things). I really love it, it's like in-camera editing

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

da5nsy In reply to VeraAda [2010-08-06 17:00:12 +0000 UTC]

Hmm yeah as it it happens I developed a film earlier today where I accidentally did some double exposures and I love them! Definitely need to explore...
They're heavy though and I'd need to carry them ALL the time!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

VeraAda In reply to da5nsy [2010-08-10 05:40:14 +0000 UTC]

The accidental ones are often some of the best ones

and yes, in my group of friends i'm always the one carrying 2 full bags because of the cameras i always bring >.<
it can get annoying but i don't regret it when i see the moments i capture

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

da5nsy In reply to VeraAda [2010-08-20 23:12:50 +0000 UTC]

I totally understand
I think this weekend I'm going to try a couple of your ideas out, just for practice, gonna make a couple of background films, maybe some out of focus light and maybe some flames- I love Hazard Perception !
I'll let you know how it goes

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

VeraAda In reply to da5nsy [2010-08-22 05:54:23 +0000 UTC]

awesome, i wish you luck
please do keep me informed, link me when you post the results!
and thanks so much, i'm glad you like 'Hazard Perception' -i think the flames are so far my most successful double exposure texture (i have several more to post)

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

da5nsy In reply to VeraAda [2010-08-22 10:40:38 +0000 UTC]

Yeah they look great!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

VeraAda In reply to da5nsy [2010-08-22 12:39:44 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

TangerineGirl [2010-05-23 21:21:36 +0000 UTC]

double exposure in this one?? *o*

when I try, I just mess up and neither of the two images is clear... >__<

anyway, this is awesome! good work!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

VeraAda In reply to TangerineGirl [2010-05-24 01:05:12 +0000 UTC]

yeah, a double exposure with bokeh at night

what camera/s do you use for your double exposures?
it's important to remember to under-expose the texture shot, and for the second exposure to take it like a normal shot (maybe underexpose it a bit if conditions are very sunny).
i also mark the film to make the 2 exposures line up correctly.
but yeah, it takes some time to really get the hang of multiple exposures, and even then it's always a hit-and-miss kind of business because there are so many other factors that affect the end result that you can't really control.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

da5nsy In reply to VeraAda [2010-08-20 23:10:08 +0000 UTC]

ooh I'll have to remember to mark my film, that's a great idea!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

VeraAda In reply to da5nsy [2010-08-22 05:54:56 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

embersgolden [2010-05-21 01:45:56 +0000 UTC]

lovely/does the title reference dissolved girl by massive attack?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

VeraAda In reply to embersgolden [2010-05-21 11:02:56 +0000 UTC]

thanks
yeah it's a reference to the song - i would've named it the full title, but i think i already have photo under that name in my gallery >.<

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

tractern [2010-05-10 18:49:46 +0000 UTC]

Ooooo my, delicious colours!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

VeraAda In reply to tractern [2010-05-10 18:51:15 +0000 UTC]

thanks so much, i'm glad you like em

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

OrchidFeehan [2010-03-16 23:43:36 +0000 UTC]

Featured: [link]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

VeraAda In reply to OrchidFeehan [2010-03-17 12:11:04 +0000 UTC]

thanks so much!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

juriachan [2010-02-21 21:44:39 +0000 UTC]

Your lovely photo
is featured here [link]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

VeraAda In reply to juriachan [2010-02-22 06:09:41 +0000 UTC]

thanks so much!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

BurlapZack [2010-02-16 16:16:47 +0000 UTC]

Ah, very nice. I love doing double exposures like this.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

VeraAda In reply to BurlapZack [2010-02-16 18:37:59 +0000 UTC]

yeah, i've looked at some of yours and they're beautiful!

thank you

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

iNeedChemicalX [2010-02-13 22:18:18 +0000 UTC]

featured here: [link]
thank you.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

VeraAda In reply to iNeedChemicalX [2010-02-14 11:19:02 +0000 UTC]

thank you so much!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Alexeiz [2010-02-08 16:19:25 +0000 UTC]

neat, but frankly, I would have liked it better without the lil' bokeh.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

VeraAda In reply to Alexeiz [2010-02-08 17:22:07 +0000 UTC]

yeah i know what you mean, the bokeh here looks most obviously like traffic. it also landed right on her head/face... i still like it but it would be nice to have a similar clear shot too. unfortunately i didn't get any good digital shots in this pose, it got dark pretty quickly.

thanks though

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

MissObsession In reply to VeraAda [2010-02-14 05:39:53 +0000 UTC]

hm. i think it looks like a nice little bokeh crown.

to each their own.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

VeraAda In reply to MissObsession [2010-02-14 11:15:56 +0000 UTC]

thanks! i'm glad you like it

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Besaw [2010-02-05 00:57:08 +0000 UTC]

This is great. I have gotten a few double exposures accidentally, mostly on my Holga, I haven't really tried to get any on purpose. I may have to try if this is the result. Love it!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

VeraAda In reply to Besaw [2010-02-05 01:06:44 +0000 UTC]

I love double/multiple exposures - I'm kind of stuck on them actually.
You should definitely try making them on purpose! Considering how amazing accidental shots can be, imagine what you can achieve when you have a bit more control over the image. I never know which shot will line up with which when I do these, because I never write down the details of every frame I take... so some of that 'accidental' feeling is still there. Though just recently I found out my camera has a double-exposure lever - I haven't used it yet.
Thank you so much, I really appreciate the support

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

T-R-I-T-O-N [2010-02-03 13:47:43 +0000 UTC]

Wow! This is still so TERRIFIC!!!!
LOVE IT!!!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

VeraAda In reply to T-R-I-T-O-N [2010-02-04 02:13:39 +0000 UTC]

!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

T-R-I-T-O-N In reply to VeraAda [2010-02-04 11:14:47 +0000 UTC]

You are always welcome!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

bornirritating [2010-02-02 20:58:15 +0000 UTC]

Great! I love the angle and composition ^^

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

VeraAda In reply to bornirritating [2010-02-04 02:14:06 +0000 UTC]

thank you
i took more in this similar pose but they didn't work out, so at least this one did >.<

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

bornirritating In reply to VeraAda [2010-02-04 02:17:56 +0000 UTC]

Photography sounds hard! A friend of mine does some, and she's always fussing ^^

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

acidjuicy [2010-02-02 20:13:59 +0000 UTC]

really nice!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

VeraAda In reply to acidjuicy [2010-02-04 02:14:15 +0000 UTC]

thanks so much

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

etre-rimbaud [2010-02-02 19:24:48 +0000 UTC]

how can you make a double exposure..?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

VeraAda In reply to etre-rimbaud [2010-02-03 00:53:51 +0000 UTC]

i put the film through the camera twice

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

etre-rimbaud In reply to VeraAda [2010-02-03 12:00:38 +0000 UTC]

hm..not sure I understand.. do you open your camera ?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

VeraAda In reply to etre-rimbaud [2010-02-04 02:11:54 +0000 UTC]

no, i just take all the photos on the roll of film, then when i finish and wind the film back into the cassette, i put it in the camera again and take photos once more

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

etre-rimbaud In reply to VeraAda [2010-02-04 10:41:56 +0000 UTC]

ah ok ! (: thank you!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

VeraAda In reply to etre-rimbaud [2010-02-04 11:21:21 +0000 UTC]

no problem

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0