HOME | DD

Published: 2012-11-21 08:36:10 +0000 UTC; Views: 16440; Favourites: 279; Downloads: 428
Redirect to original
Description
Another vector from this week's episode. I was going to do Rainbow Dash in mid sneeze, but then best pony happened. I also decided that I should practice freehand vectoring, so everything outside of the original frame (except the cutie mark and wing) is untraced. It came out better than I expected, but if you see anything wrong (especially with proportions), please let me know.Edit (11-24): Thanks for all the comments. I have now added wings and embiggened the legs.
Edit (11-25, thanks to *Mamandil ) Thinned teeth stroke.
Related content
Comments: 31
LITTLE-94 [2023-01-08 00:47:39 +0000 UTC]
π: 0 β©: 0
AlzMarioWolfe [2014-03-15 17:41:52 +0000 UTC]
Tombstone used your vector in his Stop the Bats remix c: Congrats!
π: 0 β©: 1
VladimirMacHolzraum In reply to AlzMarioWolfe [2014-03-17 01:47:10 +0000 UTC]
Cool! Thanks for telling me.
π: 0 β©: 1
AlzMarioWolfe In reply to VladimirMacHolzraum [2014-03-17 02:00:06 +0000 UTC]
No problem c:
π: 0 β©: 0
Tapps-Pegasus [2013-10-24 19:09:50 +0000 UTC]
Oh Celestia, I love Fluttershy. I love to see her happy like this. -Wants to hug her so badly-
π: 0 β©: 0
Pacman552 [2013-03-23 20:18:52 +0000 UTC]
Flutty is so beautiful. I eat it to the base of kisses β₯
π: 0 β©: 0
JETFIREtherebel [2012-12-05 14:43:13 +0000 UTC]
the wings are a little low and her body looks kinda short
π: 0 β©: 1
VladimirMacHolzraum In reply to JETFIREtherebel [2012-12-05 16:13:42 +0000 UTC]
Those parts are that way in the reference.
π: 0 β©: 1
JETFIREtherebel In reply to VladimirMacHolzraum [2012-12-05 16:43:28 +0000 UTC]
Oh ok then!
π: 0 β©: 0
VladimirMacHolzraum In reply to pokefan88 [2012-11-22 20:10:10 +0000 UTC]
A trace of a trace, huh? Sure, I don't see any reason why not.
π: 0 β©: 1
pokefan88 In reply to VladimirMacHolzraum [2012-11-23 05:31:25 +0000 UTC]
on second thought,i can't trace lol
π: 0 β©: 0
Onsaud [2012-11-22 05:50:27 +0000 UTC]
Well, the legs are pretty shortβthey should be noticeably longer than the head. And the hock joint is pretty thick, while the calf is too thin. From this angle, the calf should be about 2/3 the width of the hock joint.
π: 0 β©: 1
VladimirMacHolzraum In reply to Onsaud [2012-11-22 20:07:57 +0000 UTC]
OK, I guess the tiny legs explain why the head looks so big. I'll try to fix this, thanks.
π: 0 β©: 1
Onsaud In reply to VladimirMacHolzraum [2012-11-22 20:43:35 +0000 UTC]
No problem! Those legs can be tricky.
π: 0 β©: 1
VladimirMacHolzraum In reply to Onsaud [2012-11-22 20:50:04 +0000 UTC]
The legs were actually even smaller at first. That's probably how the calf ended up so thin.
π: 0 β©: 1
Onsaud In reply to VladimirMacHolzraum [2012-11-22 21:17:39 +0000 UTC]
Easy mistake to make. But a pretty scary one.
π: 0 β©: 0
moonwing-115 [2012-11-21 17:15:14 +0000 UTC]
It looks great, but her wings are missing... I'm only saying something, because you asked
π: 0 β©: 1
VladimirMacHolzraum In reply to moonwing-115 [2012-11-21 17:27:09 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, I'm gonna fix that, but I'm kinda busy today, so it'll be a bit later.
π: 0 β©: 1
moonwing-115 In reply to VladimirMacHolzraum [2012-11-21 17:43:00 +0000 UTC]
oh, its ok
π: 0 β©: 0
Jezendar [2012-11-21 15:41:54 +0000 UTC]
You did a good job extrapolating the parts of her body outside the frame here. Her head does seem a bit too large for some reason, but that may just be the angle she's standing at. Unfortunately, you did make one glaring mistake: you forgot her wings.
π: 0 β©: 1
VladimirMacHolzraum In reply to Jezendar [2012-11-21 15:54:06 +0000 UTC]
Oh, fffffffffffffffffβ
I'll fix that a bit later.
π: 0 β©: 0
shado013 [2012-11-21 08:51:38 +0000 UTC]
Looks great. Maybe it is just the perspective, but her head seems a little larger than it was on the episode.
π: 0 β©: 1
VladimirMacHolzraum In reply to shado013 [2012-11-21 09:01:32 +0000 UTC]
I was worried about that while making this, but enough of her body is shown in the shot that I can tell how long it is, and making it any taller looked weird, so I think it is just the perspective.
π: 0 β©: 1
shado013 In reply to VladimirMacHolzraum [2012-11-22 12:21:16 +0000 UTC]
You got a point, but ya it seems to be perspective as I keep looking at it.
π: 0 β©: 0