HOME | DD

waran4 — OceanSim Test

Published: 2011-11-25 23:48:57 +0000 UTC; Views: 1117; Favourites: 27; Downloads: 41
Redirect to original
Description Edit:
I'm unsure which is better: with, or without lens flare?

A small test of the OceanSim modifier in conjunction with the Cycles engine.

Program: Blender 2.60.5
Resolution: 1920x1080
Verticles: 652 (it's the cylindric background. The ocean itself is just a displacement map)
Faces: 515
Time: 5:32 (render), 0:09 (compositing)

Used Cg Cookies' tutorial on the OceanSim as reference.
Related content
Comments: 29

Soap971 [2013-08-14 17:33:32 +0000 UTC]

Thought it was a photo x)

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

WilljCreations [2013-08-14 15:36:30 +0000 UTC]

Really nice render, great work

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Direct2Brain [2011-12-12 17:13:08 +0000 UTC]

Very nice render but 5 hours are really too much.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

waran4 In reply to Direct2Brain [2011-12-12 22:28:36 +0000 UTC]

No, that's 5 minutes, not hours

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Direct2Brain In reply to waran4 [2011-12-13 13:50:10 +0000 UTC]

Ahhhhh 5 minutes is very fast, great Cycle.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

waran4 In reply to Direct2Brain [2011-12-13 15:38:18 +0000 UTC]

Cycles has always been bitchin' fast for me on the GPU, but less so on the CPU. Everyone else says GPU's the slowest and least reliable though... o.O

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Gabriel-C [2011-12-08 18:38:35 +0000 UTC]

Well, if you don't mind a little post-work, I'll be happy to do some lens flare.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

waran4 In reply to Gabriel-C [2011-12-08 20:01:00 +0000 UTC]

I figure I could just do the lens flare in PS or the like. It's just that I haven't gotten around to doing it yet (until now). Thanks for the offer anyways

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Gabriel-C In reply to waran4 [2011-12-08 21:40:20 +0000 UTC]

No prob.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

eXecutex [2011-12-05 18:48:20 +0000 UTC]

Wow really nice render ...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

waran4 In reply to eXecutex [2011-12-05 19:19:33 +0000 UTC]

Thank you very much

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

M-JeeliDesign [2011-11-29 09:14:24 +0000 UTC]

looks nice

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

waran4 In reply to M-JeeliDesign [2011-11-29 10:22:56 +0000 UTC]

Thank you

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

merru20c [2011-11-29 08:42:37 +0000 UTC]

Looks awesome XD

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

waran4 In reply to merru20c [2011-11-29 08:48:17 +0000 UTC]

Thank you

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

merru20c In reply to waran4 [2011-11-29 08:51:40 +0000 UTC]

Your welcome

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Azorea [2011-11-27 18:04:07 +0000 UTC]

You can use photoshop

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

waran4 In reply to Azorea [2011-11-27 18:24:29 +0000 UTC]

For some completely unknown reason, I never thought of that...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SnowLeopard217 [2011-11-27 11:04:17 +0000 UTC]

quite realistic. kudos

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

waran4 In reply to SnowLeopard217 [2011-11-27 11:18:06 +0000 UTC]

Thank you

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

smily89 [2011-11-26 12:13:36 +0000 UTC]

Fortalte madamme at det var laget og ikke tatt xD
" rull inn a!"
Drit bra laget waran

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

waran4 In reply to smily89 [2011-11-26 13:38:02 +0000 UTC]

Jævlig bra Takker Føler jeg kommer til å bruke den modifikatoren en god del i nær fremtid

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

smily89 In reply to waran4 [2011-11-26 15:59:39 +0000 UTC]


Spent på å se mer av dEt du skal lage

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

waran4 In reply to smily89 [2011-11-26 17:10:56 +0000 UTC]

Tviler på at "det store, selvstendige prosjektet" kommer til å ha noe vann i det hele tatt Kansje et glass med vann, men ikke stort mer enn det... Og jeg bruker nok heller Blenders væskesimulator enn OceanSim i det tilfellet.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

smily89 In reply to waran4 [2011-11-26 19:04:15 +0000 UTC]

Haha blir kult å se uansett

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

waran4 In reply to smily89 [2011-11-26 19:36:03 +0000 UTC]

Jeg er ganske spent selv; jobber bare med ganske flate, ufarga geometriske objekter med dårlig geometrisk oppløsning (for at det hele skal kunne behandles I real-time) og er selv spent på hvordan det ser ut etter å ha trykket F12 ("render image" knappen). Tar ofte litt tid (opptil flere timer), men det ser awesomt ut hvis jeg har gjort det riktig

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

smily89 In reply to waran4 [2011-11-26 22:08:27 +0000 UTC]

er det like ille å vente på som pakke i posten med noe kult ut eller?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

waran4 In reply to smily89 [2011-11-27 00:06:45 +0000 UTC]

Noe i den duren, ja, bare at jeg vet mindre om pakken en om jeg hadde bevisst kjøpt den på nettet

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

smily89 In reply to waran4 [2011-11-29 16:17:39 +0000 UTC]

hmm =/ det er vel sant det

👍: 0 ⏩: 0