HOME | DD

WhiteRabbitInk β€” Balance

Published: 2007-09-23 10:00:46 +0000 UTC; Views: 2613; Favourites: 120; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
Related content
Comments: 40

KillMarioLoveBowser [2011-07-28 13:48:42 +0000 UTC]

Coooool...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Creativesm75 [2011-02-08 09:27:01 +0000 UTC]

nice

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

WhiteRabbitInk In reply to Creativesm75 [2011-03-25 03:07:07 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

u53rnamed [2009-12-02 00:41:27 +0000 UTC]

wow that image actually makes so much sense..

good work

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

WhiteRabbitInk In reply to u53rnamed [2009-12-02 05:34:50 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

u53rnamed In reply to WhiteRabbitInk [2009-12-03 02:24:29 +0000 UTC]

you're welcome :J

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

TeaDarkA [2009-03-27 00:35:16 +0000 UTC]

its thru, there is good in bad and bad in good.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

WhiteRabbitInk In reply to TeaDarkA [2009-03-29 04:30:59 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

LeoKingdomMaster [2009-03-17 02:47:18 +0000 UTC]

Hmm...The symbols are actually missplaced here. This is a common misunderstanding the concept of Yin and Yang being devided into the concept of good and evil. In fact, Yin (the white half) represents passion, drive and desire neither positive or negative traits in themselves, while Yan (the black half) represents calmness, steadfast, and a contemplative state, again not wholely positive of negative traits in themselves.

Passion or desire can lead to great works of art and success or it can lead to the fall of civilizations and lust. A steadfast or calm attitude can prevent one from falling into the darkness tha plauges the hearts of man and compassionate action or it can lead to stubborness and apathy. It is the attempt to find the balance, the harmony between these two diffrent, yet undeniably linked states of being that is the Yin Yang's meaning. Of course there are numerous diffrent interpretations of the philosophy so what it means to me may not be the same for the next man or woman.

Err..so yeah, the Decepticon philosophy falls more into line with giving into passion and desire totally leading to violence and destruction while the Autobot philosophy dwells more in finding harmony and peace. Ideally that is. Each man, or in this case Sentient Machine, has a diffrent personality and thought pattern that shapes the probable action they will take be it logical or not and if it falls into line with there factions adopted mantra such as Slag and Blades (hyperviolant sociopaths that only work for the Autobots because they don't like the Decepticon's more). It just so happens that one side attracts more psychopaths and murders than the other.

Uh, what was I talking about again?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

WhiteRabbitInk In reply to LeoKingdomMaster [2009-03-17 03:27:59 +0000 UTC]

First off, that's one of the best comments anyone's left here, thanks!

Second, I did consider the placement of the symbols at length (and I think its awesome that you brought it up).

I ended up siding with what you see here as a sort of nod to the point you brought up in the third part of your comment, and the fact that most people tend to cross back and forth across those lines, further underlining the grey area we've carved out for life in our society-- while paying worship to black-and-white rules and points of view.

The straight-forward good vs. evil theme of most Transformers fiction being a great example of this (with the notable exceptions of the characters you point out).

Nobody's either, yet everybody's both, dig? This is still a balance to me, and a kind of poignant one.

All that said, I may post another version...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

HanSor89 [2009-03-16 22:29:51 +0000 UTC]

It's great !

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

WhiteRabbitInk In reply to HanSor89 [2009-03-17 03:37:52 +0000 UTC]

thanks!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Pookinator [2009-02-17 23:42:12 +0000 UTC]

I love this, both the idea and the execution!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

WhiteRabbitInk In reply to Pookinator [2009-03-02 07:36:15 +0000 UTC]

Thanks! I've been meaning to beef it up a bit and add some details, but simplicity is nice sometimes too.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Lord-Naraku [2009-01-13 20:35:09 +0000 UTC]

This would make a great tattoo haha Nice!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

WhiteRabbitInk In reply to Lord-Naraku [2009-01-17 08:08:47 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Lord-Naraku In reply to WhiteRabbitInk [2009-01-17 23:19:54 +0000 UTC]

no problem

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

lonegamer7 [2008-07-30 06:04:26 +0000 UTC]

So, who would be Yin, who would be Yang?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

WhiteRabbitInk In reply to lonegamer7 [2008-07-31 04:03:09 +0000 UTC]

Depends on the viewer.

Thanks for favin'!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

beautiful---tragedy [2008-01-14 00:01:40 +0000 UTC]

Nice one dude, thats pure brilliance!!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

WhiteRabbitInk In reply to beautiful---tragedy [2008-01-14 07:35:38 +0000 UTC]



You flatter me, thank you!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ryuzo [2007-12-25 13:04:31 +0000 UTC]

Very simple...yet never done before! Nice.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

WhiteRabbitInk In reply to ryuzo [2007-12-26 23:37:35 +0000 UTC]

Cheers!

I intend to beef it up a bit before I get it inked on my arm, bit I think the simplicity serves it well as a graphic.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Starath [2007-11-17 20:29:37 +0000 UTC]

Makes sense to me!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

hiredhand [2007-09-28 09:30:46 +0000 UTC]

Nice!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

WhiteRabbitInk In reply to hiredhand [2007-09-29 19:20:03 +0000 UTC]

Thanks Matt!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

WindChargerNut [2007-09-24 08:22:55 +0000 UTC]

So simple yet so cool.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

WhiteRabbitInk In reply to WindChargerNut [2007-09-24 15:10:50 +0000 UTC]

Thanks WCN!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Transformers-Mosaic [2007-09-23 22:12:42 +0000 UTC]

Nice work man

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

WhiteRabbitInk In reply to Transformers-Mosaic [2007-09-24 01:19:10 +0000 UTC]

Thanks mate!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Hrouge [2007-09-23 17:53:20 +0000 UTC]

that is so awsome!!!! Transformers rule!!!!!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

WhiteRabbitInk In reply to Hrouge [2007-09-23 21:00:29 +0000 UTC]

Yes they do, and thank you for the comment!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

sataans-ragdoll [2007-09-23 14:28:19 +0000 UTC]

haha! that's awesome!!
<3!!!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

WhiteRabbitInk In reply to sataans-ragdoll [2007-09-23 21:00:26 +0000 UTC]

Thanks! I appreciate it!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

sataans-ragdoll In reply to WhiteRabbitInk [2007-09-23 23:14:00 +0000 UTC]

MmHMMmmmmm

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

WhiteRabbitInk In reply to sataans-ragdoll [2007-09-24 01:18:34 +0000 UTC]

Er?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

sataans-ragdoll In reply to WhiteRabbitInk [2007-09-24 04:56:41 +0000 UTC]

haha, just agreeing in non-sense-ical tones.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

WhiteRabbitInk In reply to sataans-ragdoll [2007-09-24 06:09:44 +0000 UTC]

Oh, ok. Well, I'll see your nonsensical tones and raise you some NONSENSICAL CHARACTERS:

ƒ╬β•₯Ο€v<Γ·|─○XΞ£*Ξ΄*β—‹xβ”œ|2Β΅r▀┐.F╗ΓÖÿ♠♠Γ₯╖≑!

Bwah hah hah!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

sataans-ragdoll In reply to WhiteRabbitInk [2007-09-24 13:34:34 +0000 UTC]

MWHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!
I think you might have won though...
>_______<

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

WhiteRabbitInk In reply to sataans-ragdoll [2007-09-26 08:29:00 +0000 UTC]

Pfft, quitter!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0