HOME | DD

WickedWriter β€” Math
Published: 2009-11-03 21:20:36 +0000 UTC; Views: 2030; Favourites: 48; Downloads: 14
Redirect to original
Description If Math is nothing but a Language, and Language is a way to express Love. Then Love is Math.

This would make sense, after all this is nothing but an equality. I could preform a proof for you if you need reassuring, but I digress.

The only problem with the above proof is the application. If Love is a variable, you can never solve for it. Love has no right solution. You can never graph Love. Love is always discontinuous, finding the derivative will only give you a headache. There is no Limit as Love goes to Zero nor Infinity. And I don't even want to think about its integral. There is nothing about Love that is Math.

Love has no equations, no rules, no theorems, or postulates. There is no solution for Love. Why care for something so confusing?

I'll just will stick with my numbers, triangles, x's, and y's. I'll say with my Geometry, Trigonometry, Algebra, and Calculus. I adore my proofs, my calculator, and my ruler.

After all if Love is Math then, you have to remember that equalities are commutative.Β Β Therefore, Math is Love.
Related content
Comments: 61

duderaafi [2015-12-28 09:43:08 +0000 UTC]

Do you know how to love it?

I really want to love that subject~ ^^

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

squiggledog [2015-11-02 21:00:08 +0000 UTC]

This is the Affirming the Consequence fallacy. Remember, the converse of a condition isn't necessarily true.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

sprinklestar [2011-01-14 03:21:04 +0000 UTC]

Math is such a wonderful subject. It really gets the brain moving. I 10√e math.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

WickedWriter In reply to sprinklestar [2011-01-15 18:49:40 +0000 UTC]

Isn't though! Thanks for the comment.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

entegrel [2010-05-06 05:14:37 +0000 UTC]

great job!, i really like it, and love math to..

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

WickedWriter In reply to entegrel [2010-05-06 23:41:06 +0000 UTC]

Awesome, and Thanks ^_^

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Ryamos-Suandables [2010-04-15 17:36:31 +0000 UTC]

Funky that I read this the morning after a friend and I talk about how math cannot be a universal language because, while numbers are pure and constant within the earth, measurements are not, and most science relies on the math of measurements, not numerals. Brain Blown Away!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

WickedWriter In reply to Ryamos-Suandables [2010-04-16 21:20:35 +0000 UTC]

That's an interesting theory and does make a lot of sense. Thanks for the comment.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Ryamos-Suandables In reply to WickedWriter [2010-04-28 14:46:53 +0000 UTC]

I know, I'm spooky like that

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Shadowed-Serenity [2009-11-11 23:57:18 +0000 UTC]

Hmm... Math and love are both languages understood by all... but this is really a great extended metaphor. Well done!

Love is a weapon of Math disruption.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

WickedWriter In reply to Shadowed-Serenity [2009-11-12 23:59:04 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for the comment. I'm glad you liked it. I like that line. ^_^

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Shadowed-Serenity In reply to WickedWriter [2009-11-13 00:12:37 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

GirlWithAHat [2009-11-11 07:47:04 +0000 UTC]

As I like math I think this is funny.

I figure you're busy with NaNo right now, but I can't fight against my being a grammar nazi, so...
"you can never solve for it." (I never heard "solve for" before.)
"I'll just will stick..." (No further comment.)
"After all if Love is Math then, you have to remember..." (That comma looks desperately wrong-placed.)

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

WickedWriter In reply to GirlWithAHat [2009-11-11 20:49:56 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for pointing those out. I didn't even see that. Thanks for the comment.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

GirlWithAHat In reply to WickedWriter [2009-11-11 20:52:16 +0000 UTC]

You're welcome.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Kira73 [2009-11-10 04:15:59 +0000 UTC]

Makes me want to bring a protractor and a slide ruler into the bedroom. Kinky time.

Forgive me. It's late.

The only part that bugged me about this (my dislike of proofs aside) was that first you say love is math, then you say it isn't two paragraphs later, then you say it is again at the end. So I wasn't truly convinced here.

I still love it, though. A very unique metaphor.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

WickedWriter In reply to Kira73 [2009-11-11 20:49:12 +0000 UTC]

Nice. I need to work on this some more. Thanks for pointing out where is doesn't make sense. Thanks for the comment. ^_^

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Kira73 In reply to WickedWriter [2009-11-11 21:09:32 +0000 UTC]

No biggie really. If no one else points it out, it might just be me.

I'm trying not to make a big deal out of this exercise. Too many other WIPs to spend my time on perfecting. Still a fun distraction.

Take care.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Chaldemone [2009-11-08 22:30:38 +0000 UTC]

"If Math is nothing but a Language, and Language is a way to express Love. Then Love is Math."

That's an invalid form of argumentation.

"Math is nothing but a Language" implies that there are other Languages. This means that Math is a subset of the set of all Languages.

"Language is a way to express Love." The way this is worded implies that there are other ways by which one can express Love. And X being a way to B implies that X is a path and B is the destination. They are not the same. What I draw from your second premise is that Language is a subset of the all the ways (roads) that lead to Love.

However, as a set may be infinite and still prove statements, Math (a subset of the set of all Languages) may not be a part of the crucial subset of all Languages that lead to Love.


Basically... what I'm saying here is that you can't conclude anything logically from your two premises aside from reiteration. Unless you add another premise (or two or seven).

And I'm sorry if I sound like an arrogant douchebag (which I may or may not be), but I get excited whenever I find a way to apply symbolic logic... since it's otherwise totally useless, lol.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

WickedWriter In reply to Chaldemone [2009-11-09 17:30:34 +0000 UTC]

Math isn't a subset of language, it is its own language. We are looking at at the language of math, solely. Yes there are other ways to express love, but if you factor out those outliers then we are looking at just the language portion of love.

The first statement is from the equality statement. A=B and B=C, then A=C. Where A is Math, B is Language, and C is Love. So if Math=Language, Language=Love then Math=Love. You also have to remember to look at this with a scientific mind, or else it probably won't make much since.

I like your symbolic logic, it made me think about how to defend my argument. Thanks for the comment. ^_^

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Chaldemone In reply to WickedWriter [2009-11-09 19:40:39 +0000 UTC]

Yes, just as English and Japanese and Italian are their own languages, but the point is that there is a set of Languages that includes English, Japanese, Italian, and Math. Math isn't Language, math is language - a Language. I'm really interested in your proof of your proposed theorem.

You didn't state that Language is Love, nor do I think many people would agree with that premise. So, given that we were to accept your first premise, that Math is Language, then Math is a way to express Love, but is not Love itself. Unless you firmly believe that a road is equivalent to the destination (in which case all roads have split personalities as the road from A to B is the same as the road from B to A).

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

classicqueen13 [2009-11-08 21:06:16 +0000 UTC]

Math is a language. I've heard that one a few times before, but you did some nice work.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

WickedWriter In reply to classicqueen13 [2009-11-08 22:51:12 +0000 UTC]

I actually got this idea from a friend who was talking about how Math is a language and once you speak it, its easy. Thanks for the comment, I'm glad you liked it.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Heri-Sinye [2009-11-04 19:51:47 +0000 UTC]

Math = love? hmm... interesting. I assure you it doesn't feel that way at a 5-hour long calculus-exam, hehe (or maybe it's just like some really complicated and messed up love??).
Someone said that love is like Pi, I think love is more like i. An imaginary number we try to define, to make more "real" and manageable, in the end though... it's just something we made up.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

WickedWriter In reply to Heri-Sinye [2009-11-04 20:29:52 +0000 UTC]

That is Amazing. I agree wholeheartedly! i is a great way to explain what love is. I do have to agree that after a Calc exam, there is no love. But that doesn't mean you don't love it at all. Thanks for the comment.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Andr0o [2009-11-04 08:57:11 +0000 UTC]

No limits would be negative infinity to infinity, close though, just infinitely wrong.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

WickedWriter In reply to Andr0o [2009-11-04 20:31:08 +0000 UTC]

But since Love is discontinuous that would mean the limit does not exist at the point. Thanks for the comment.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

theforsaken4 [2009-11-04 08:38:51 +0000 UTC]

Very interesting piece minus a few grammatical errors. Also, math = love = horrifying. Therefore, math = horrifying.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

WickedWriter In reply to theforsaken4 [2009-11-04 20:22:14 +0000 UTC]

Well played math there. Thanks for the comment. I will have to go through and edit this a bit more.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

meoooooooooow [2009-11-04 06:13:24 +0000 UTC]

I math it! ;D
You have made this nerd a very happy one, I think it was written very well. <3

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

WickedWriter In reply to meoooooooooow [2009-11-04 06:27:28 +0000 UTC]

Thanks. I am glad that I can make other nerds happy.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ChloroformBoy [2009-11-04 05:55:00 +0000 UTC]

math = love
tis true !!!

observe my geekiness:
u > -1/3
3u > -1
square both sides
3u > i
i < 3u

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

WickedWriter In reply to ChloroformBoy [2009-11-04 06:29:12 +0000 UTC]

That is awesome, though I feel more geeky since -1 squared is just one. The square root of -1 is i. I need to stop being so nerdy. Thanks for the comment I am so glad you liked it and I love your equation.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ChloroformBoy In reply to WickedWriter [2009-11-04 07:07:00 +0000 UTC]

shit, i knew i messed up !

u > -.111111
-u > .111111
-(u2) > 1/9
u2 > -1/9
9u2 > -1
take square root of both sides
3u > i
i < 3u

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

WickedWriter In reply to ChloroformBoy [2009-11-04 07:19:55 +0000 UTC]

Awesome

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ChloroformBoy In reply to WickedWriter [2009-11-04 07:22:05 +0000 UTC]

i also make my own math up DX

ie

3+2=4
solve for 2

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

NikkiFirestarter [2009-11-04 05:48:49 +0000 UTC]

Love the nerdy jokes~<3 Hehe, they're so much fun ^^

Great little prose, I enjoyed it :3

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

WickedWriter In reply to NikkiFirestarter [2009-11-04 06:20:41 +0000 UTC]

Thanks, I'm glad you liked it.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

NikkiFirestarter In reply to WickedWriter [2009-11-04 06:52:21 +0000 UTC]

You're welcome ^^

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

GhuneiM [2009-11-04 01:33:36 +0000 UTC]

love is not maths, nor maths is love, because as ya said maths is a language, languages express love in various ways, so if love is expressive through maths, it won't be but a math error!

for me, love can't be expressed in any language, love is love, no word can be enough to do the job, and the simplest things might help ya, but you have to be true!
integrate all the good in the world, and maybe then you will find your word, or expression, or feeling, or aim..

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

WickedWriter In reply to GhuneiM [2009-11-04 02:58:04 +0000 UTC]

That is a good way of thinking. But looking at a scientific viewpoint, it is taken literally that Love is a Language so therefore it can be proved that Love is Math. I still like your thinking too.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

PaperDart [2009-11-04 00:55:54 +0000 UTC]

The derivative of love is company, and it's integral is God.

I really like the idea you have here, although, as you implied, the prose is a little bit rough. (It sounds like you know how to change that, though, so I won't go on about it.)

Very nice metaphor - and I agree that it's quite like xkcd.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

WickedWriter In reply to PaperDart [2009-11-04 02:51:13 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for the comment. That is a good saying . I will need to work on this more, but this was just for a small break in my NaNoWriMo escapade.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Color-By-Number [2009-11-04 00:18:50 +0000 UTC]

This brings my mind to xkcd. Love is the variable with no given value. I find love to be as pi. Infinitesimal, and its exact value will never be known. We summarize love to a definition of a feeling, as we summarize pi to 3.14

From now on, 3:14 will be known to me as the moment for love.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

WickedWriter In reply to Color-By-Number [2009-11-04 02:48:26 +0000 UTC]

That is amazing! Why haven't I heard of that before. Thanks for the comment.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Color-By-Number In reply to WickedWriter [2009-11-04 03:05:12 +0000 UTC]

I just remembered xkcd's 55th comic.
[link]
And thought of all that love is pi stuff on my own. lol

Glad you enjoyed it, fellow nerd.

So what's your nanowrimo novel about?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

WickedWriter In reply to Color-By-Number [2009-11-04 06:44:01 +0000 UTC]

That comic is awesome. I love your saying about pi. It makes me smile a very nerdy smile

My NaNo novel is about a Vampire Hunter Hunter. I know Vampires are overdone and cliche but its for fun, I wasn't planing on doing a vampire story but ideas happen. The story is about a man named Leon who falls in love with a girl named Eleanor (Nicknamed Lenore). Leon finds out that she is a Vampire. She is killed soon after by a Vampire hunter. Leon then seeks revenge by learning how to fight from different mythological creatures and saves many other creatures from the hunters. He will only kill the one who killed Lenore and try to get her fangs back since there is a rumor that if a vampires fangs are collected there may be a way to bring the vampire back to life.

Its not the best idea but its fun to write about. I saw on your page that you are doing it as well. Whats your novel about?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Color-By-Number In reply to WickedWriter [2009-11-04 07:05:39 +0000 UTC]

That actually sounds rather interesting. Would you like an idea I just thought of?

Putting a steak through the vampire's heart simply renders them immobile. The only way to slay them is to pull the fangs from their mouths. Stupid idea, yea. But then it's more plausible to resurrect with the fangs. And it's a hell of a lot better than sparkling.

Meh. I'm writing about a video game character who becomes conscious and goes off on quests. Simple idea so far, but it's building. He's followed by players and game developers, and I'm thinking one of the developers will save him from being deleted by moving him to another server. It's based in an MMO, so it'll hold similarities to WoW.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

WickedWriter In reply to Color-By-Number [2009-11-04 07:28:28 +0000 UTC]

That does sound interesting. I think the fangs is more going to be like a trophy the hunter collect and its not really proven if it could even resurrect her but he is willing to try. Actually this story was inspired by Twilight. That book was so horrid and made me weep for not only the future of Vampire novels, but for the future of humanity. That I felt I needed to write this to make myself feel better. XD

I actually really like that idea. There is a lot you can do with that story line, and you can add some WoW jokes that only a those who play the game will get or something. That is very different.

I wish you good luck with NaNo this year.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Color-By-Number In reply to WickedWriter [2009-11-04 07:42:50 +0000 UTC]

It's my first year, and so far I don't feel like I'm doing very well. I haven't really written anything. It's all just characters and plot.

Good luck, and hopefully I'll get back on my lazy ass with writing on the mind!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>