HOME | DD

Wom-bat — FF Doll, Take two

Published: 2008-01-23 21:35:17 +0000 UTC; Views: 1056; Favourites: 31; Downloads: 23
Redirect to original
Description Okay, here's my take on the Blue Kitty I made using 's female furry dollmaker, located here : [link]

I admit it's a quick drawing done with my Wacom tablet but it still turned out okay...Even if I'm still not 100% happy with the lines ^.^;

So let me know what you think ^.^
Related content
Comments: 59

Wom-bat In reply to ??? [2008-02-11 07:25:26 +0000 UTC]

Thanks, I never thought I'd come up with something I might want to turn into a character, but i did ^.^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Gigicom In reply to Wom-bat [2008-02-11 18:10:54 +0000 UTC]

^_^

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Crystal-for-ever [2008-01-24 17:56:06 +0000 UTC]

that is really awesome^^ great job ^O^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Wom-bat In reply to Crystal-for-ever [2008-01-24 20:43:26 +0000 UTC]

Thank you, I'm glad you like her ^.^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Crystal-for-ever In reply to Wom-bat [2008-01-26 22:25:32 +0000 UTC]

you are welcome^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Wom-bat In reply to Crystal-for-ever [2008-01-26 22:56:00 +0000 UTC]

^.^

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MajorSamCarter [2008-01-24 13:04:31 +0000 UTC]

sexy!....*faves*.....she looks great!......

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Wom-bat In reply to MajorSamCarter [2008-01-24 17:03:03 +0000 UTC]

Really? I'm glad you like her then ^.^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MajorSamCarter In reply to Wom-bat [2008-01-24 18:34:53 +0000 UTC]

yeah!..heheh....i do...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Wom-bat In reply to MajorSamCarter [2008-01-24 20:40:17 +0000 UTC]

^.^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MajorSamCarter In reply to Wom-bat [2008-01-24 21:02:38 +0000 UTC]

...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Wom-bat In reply to MajorSamCarter [2008-01-24 23:59:19 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MajorSamCarter In reply to Wom-bat [2008-01-25 16:24:30 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Wom-bat In reply to MajorSamCarter [2008-01-25 20:01:54 +0000 UTC]



👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MajorSamCarter In reply to Wom-bat [2008-01-25 20:10:03 +0000 UTC]

lol.....

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

evilredcaboose [2008-01-24 02:37:14 +0000 UTC]

That is beautiful. I certainly like your version.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Wom-bat In reply to evilredcaboose [2008-01-24 02:45:07 +0000 UTC]

Thank you, though if I could dupe the original style I'd keep drawing her in that ^.^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

evilredcaboose In reply to Wom-bat [2008-01-24 02:52:18 +0000 UTC]

But yours is indeed sexy

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Wom-bat In reply to evilredcaboose [2008-01-24 04:26:37 +0000 UTC]

*blush* Thank you kindly ^.^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

evilredcaboose In reply to Wom-bat [2008-01-24 04:51:57 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

IsThisChaos [2008-01-23 23:18:03 +0000 UTC]

...I liek the sexy version better ^_~

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Wom-bat In reply to IsThisChaos [2008-01-24 02:29:19 +0000 UTC]

Me too, and I might draw a naughty version of her too ^.^;

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

IsThisChaos In reply to Wom-bat [2008-01-26 16:48:10 +0000 UTC]

Ooooo, doooo! *squeals*

Me, a rabid raving lesbian? Nooooo

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Wom-bat In reply to IsThisChaos [2008-01-26 22:52:00 +0000 UTC]

I'm planning it as we speak so you will see something. Though if I go too naughty I might have to make an edited version for DA ^.^

"Me, a rabid raving lesbian? Nooooo"

I think you have your new signature text

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IsThisChaos In reply to Wom-bat [2008-01-27 17:57:13 +0000 UTC]

Heeheehee, awesome! I demand to see both versions

As for signature text...*points*

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Wom-bat In reply to IsThisChaos [2008-01-28 03:37:09 +0000 UTC]

Yay!

And I'll work on them this week sometime ^.^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IsThisChaos In reply to Wom-bat [2008-01-30 01:54:43 +0000 UTC]

Awesome!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Wom-bat In reply to IsThisChaos [2008-01-30 04:52:05 +0000 UTC]

Turns out it's just the one, unless I do a little Photoshop censoring ^.^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IsThisChaos In reply to Wom-bat [2008-01-31 21:27:55 +0000 UTC]

Aww, drat DA and its censorship

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Wom-bat In reply to IsThisChaos [2008-01-31 22:11:46 +0000 UTC]

That's why I also post on FA. Though I do respect DA's policy on that kind of art.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IsThisChaos In reply to Wom-bat [2008-01-31 22:21:39 +0000 UTC]

Good plan. Yeah, DA's got a point. I think they ought to make a way of sorting the images, though. The mature filter isn't quite as good as it could have been, imho.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Wom-bat In reply to IsThisChaos [2008-01-31 22:38:56 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, anyone can lie about their age online^.^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IsThisChaos In reply to Wom-bat [2008-01-31 22:39:59 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, that's a good point *nods*

Still, I guess it's their choice, but - oh, I dunno I lost my train of thought

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Wom-bat In reply to IsThisChaos [2008-01-31 22:48:36 +0000 UTC]

Ask Thomas, maybe he knows where it is ^.^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IsThisChaos In reply to Wom-bat [2008-02-01 02:07:27 +0000 UTC]

I just laughed so hard at that!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Wom-bat In reply to IsThisChaos [2008-02-01 05:14:52 +0000 UTC]

Yay! You got the joke

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IsThisChaos In reply to Wom-bat [2008-02-01 21:37:04 +0000 UTC]

I used to have a Thomas bed

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Wom-bat In reply to IsThisChaos [2008-02-02 04:55:01 +0000 UTC]

Nothing to be ahsamed of, I used to like the show. And while it was amusing to see Ringo Starr and George Carlin in the host segments as Mr. Conductor, I pretty much watched it because the model work was incredible ^.^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IsThisChaos In reply to Wom-bat [2008-02-02 06:13:28 +0000 UTC]

It made me happy

(There's a steam railway near my house that hosts Thomas days )

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Wom-bat In reply to IsThisChaos [2008-02-02 08:08:00 +0000 UTC]

That sounds kinda cool ^.^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IsThisChaos In reply to Wom-bat [2008-02-06 14:13:04 +0000 UTC]

I steam railways

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Wom-bat In reply to IsThisChaos [2008-02-06 19:02:11 +0000 UTC]

That's understandable. On the one hand you have the complex intricacy of some of the older engines, while on the other hand there is the older trains also have a romantic quality to them. You might even have your own reasons that differ from what i suggest. It doesn't matter why you like them, just that you do

And they are kind cool ^.^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IsThisChaos In reply to Wom-bat [2008-02-07 06:22:27 +0000 UTC]

What you said came very close to why I like steam trains. Mostly the latter point, I have to say I can most certainly be a hopeless, helples romantic

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Wom-bat In reply to IsThisChaos [2008-02-07 06:58:02 +0000 UTC]

Nothing wrong with the Minxie ^.^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IsThisChaos In reply to Wom-bat [2008-02-07 17:45:57 +0000 UTC]

Yay!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Wom-bat In reply to IsThisChaos [2008-02-07 20:14:05 +0000 UTC]

Now if you said you were a fan of "Jay Jay the Jet Plane" I would have to worry ^.^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IsThisChaos In reply to Wom-bat [2008-02-07 21:49:41 +0000 UTC]

That...is something I haven't heard of

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Wom-bat In reply to IsThisChaos [2008-02-08 03:15:47 +0000 UTC]

Think Thomas, but with planes, shot on video with bad effects, no attention to detail what so ever...AND THE PLANES HAVE HUMAN FACES AND COLORING!

Run, run while you can

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IsThisChaos In reply to Wom-bat [2008-02-08 18:18:41 +0000 UTC]

*runs!*

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Wom-bat In reply to IsThisChaos [2008-02-08 21:06:53 +0000 UTC]

Pray you never see an episode, the commercials alone are enough to make you cringe.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>