HOME | DD

Published: 2008-01-27 05:04:13 +0000 UTC; Views: 9759; Favourites: 125; Downloads: 33
Redirect to original
Description
I thought of this after Goblet of Fire.Harry usually ignores the simplest solutions.
Related content
Comments: 78
wotchertonks7 In reply to ??? [2008-03-23 04:36:22 +0000 UTC]
You're right. That's why these movies are so perfect.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
wotchertonks7 In reply to Sagasimon [2008-02-14 20:44:41 +0000 UTC]
I like to think that I'm deranged in a good sort of way. It's just good to know that my comics don't horrify people with their silliness.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
NorahSS [2008-02-08 21:08:44 +0000 UTC]
buahahahaha! this is soooo fucking funny! I'm dead!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BlackPriestess [2008-02-02 17:55:29 +0000 UTC]
^___^ But the rules said, no wands But generally, you're right, of course
I just love your comics. Really funny
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
wotchertonks7 In reply to BlackPriestess [2008-02-02 19:06:29 +0000 UTC]
It took me a moment to realize that you are the author of SS, Fav Enemy.
I LOVE that story! I am only half way thru but want to get back to it. I was against the idea of Snape and James at first, but the description of Snape and the Whomping Willow was so mesmerizing and sensual. I got sucked it and started to love the idea of the boys together.
Thank you for the wonderful comments! Comming from you it is the highest praise!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BlackPriestess In reply to wotchertonks7 [2008-02-08 13:06:45 +0000 UTC]
Oh my
glad you think so, thank you so much. And it means even more to me if I can hmm, "convert" someone who doesn't like the pairing first
.
Still I was wrong about the Moody-Harry-wand issue. Me= as well *g* sorry
(yet again a Knight-Rider-plothole here ^^)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
wotchertonks7 In reply to BlackPriestess [2008-02-08 15:16:37 +0000 UTC]
You're welcome. Good writing always gets to me. And all plotholes shall be jumped over, Dukes of Hazzard style. Yee-ha!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BlackPriestess In reply to wotchertonks7 [2008-02-10 11:29:15 +0000 UTC]
Thanx
But, tsk, tsk, plot holes even in the books, not only the movies!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
wotchertonks7 In reply to BlackPriestess [2008-02-10 20:23:29 +0000 UTC]
Thank goodness fanfiction can help patch things up, or at least change it around to make more sense.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
BlackPriestess In reply to BlackPriestess [2008-02-02 17:58:58 +0000 UTC]
*HEAD MEETS DESK* Please ignore me! Of course you were _entirely_ right O_O soooooorry!
(Okay, let's just say, maybe the egg's been Accio-proof ^^)
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
wotchertonks7 In reply to heidinanookie [2008-01-28 20:29:09 +0000 UTC]
It starts with the most innocent comment. One of my fellow Potterheads will say something like: "Why didn't someone just 'Accio' the frakkin egg?" And then the wheels of my crazy mind begin to spin.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Silvercresent11 [2008-01-28 16:17:13 +0000 UTC]
Haha! This is great I love Fleur's face...XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
wotchertonks7 In reply to Techmaga [2008-01-27 20:22:56 +0000 UTC]
Hee Hee! My dirty minds works in wicked ways.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Techmaga In reply to wotchertonks7 [2008-01-28 16:10:44 +0000 UTC]
Fill me innnn!!! *curious* puuuhleaaaseee!!! You picked my curiousity! T_T
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
wotchertonks7 In reply to Techmaga [2008-01-28 16:20:41 +0000 UTC]
It would only corrupt the innocent until they bleed from their eyes. Oh yes, I'm that good.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Techmaga In reply to wotchertonks7 [2008-01-30 04:52:11 +0000 UTC]
*pout*
Meanie!
*Runs away with a trail of tears gushing out from me.*
Or note me?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
chikaru-chan In reply to wotchertonks7 [2009-07-03 20:06:27 +0000 UTC]
GAH SOMEONE TELL ME WHAT THE INNUENDO IS!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Eruantien-Fett [2008-01-27 05:40:30 +0000 UTC]
I thought about that too, but it was placed under a spell that prevented that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
wotchertonks7 In reply to Eruantien-Fett [2008-01-27 06:47:21 +0000 UTC]
I'm so relieved to know that I'm not the only one who has dirty thoughts.
I have more on the way.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Eruantien-Fett In reply to wotchertonks7 [2008-01-27 07:18:26 +0000 UTC]
Call me naive, but I didn't see anything dirty with that when I first commented it. Now that I take a second look, I know what you meant with it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
wotchertonks7 In reply to Eruantien-Fett [2008-01-27 08:50:02 +0000 UTC]
LOL! Okay, I am the only one with a dirty mind around here.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
<= Prev |