HOME | DD

x-lazulith-x — Semi-realistic Ralts Line [with headcanons]

#gardevoir #kirlia #pokemon #ralts #gallade
Published: 2016-05-30 23:07:38 +0000 UTC; Views: 22646; Favourites: 354; Downloads: 95
Redirect to original
Description

so i. spent the past two days working on this thing which is largely a headcanon dump regarding the ralts line (which are pretty much my comfort pokemon tbh) with colored pictures serving as a semi-realistic take on their design, which overall resembles their canon appearance but with more details regarding their anatomy, and that’s pretty much because i overall based several aspects of their appearance on felines rather than bugs/apes/birds/aliens/whatever else other people base a Realistic Look for them on. 

also reason why i describe the image as "semi-realistic" is pretty much entirely because idk my art style itself isn't incredibly realistic, it's mostly the content behind it that would count as realistic i think?

EDIT: I updated the file again, this time it's a more updated version of the picture with the notes. i even fully colored everything! i also typed various things i wrote, since my handwriting is sloppy and uneven so i figure that typing things would make it all more readable.

Notes on Design/Animal Basis: mammalian, especially feline-like, characteristics make the most sense to me considering it’s largely accepted the green thing on their head is hair, and mammals are characterized by possessing hair (and also by possessing mammaries). as for feline characteristics, it’s largely things like having proportionally very large eyes with slitted pupils (if you pay attention to official artwork it’s fairly apparent their pupils are indeed vertical slits as opposed to round pupils), apparently digitigrade feet (at least this is how i see their feet, since they have small footprints [only consisting of a dot] and their feet are drawn to end in narrow points while kirlia is drawn always standing on its toes), and Kirlia and Ralts in particular have rather soft, squishy-looking bodies much like cats do.

i don’t think i’m alone in this considering when i showed my mother an image of Kirlia, she described it as being like a kitten lol

i don’t view them as BEING cats though, they just have some superficial resemblance to them, i imagine their behavior is way different, and also i don’t view them as serving any similar niche in the ecosystem either, as many wild felines are predators, sometimes apex predators (as a Pyroar, Liepard, maybe even a Persian may be), and are almost always hypercarnivorous, while imo the Ralts line is herbivorous, preferring to feed on fruits and other easily-digestible plant matter. it would be very weird to think about a member of the Ralts line, a very empathetic and sensitive species, actively going out to kill other pokemon, even if to eat them, tbh, they seem like they would be a fairly peaceful species, and mainly use their abilities for defensive purposes

also i made gallade’s weird hips into fluffy hair because??? its hips were so confusing in the official art? they were practically like a shelf that went all the way around. the weird hips were my least favorite thing about gallade’s design lol

and the species’ “skirts”/”dresses” are just long fur, and not an actual dress/skirt, and isn’t removable like an awful lot of headcanons i have seen portray them?? the removeable dresses don’t make much sense to me tbh… kinda like the idea that they aren’t covered in fur and that they just have pure snow white skin while being indigenous to a tropical island, and those “spikes” on their cheeks are just idk actual spikes

in general these aren’t really all too human-like (another issue i have with some “realistic” drawings of the line, they often look too much like noseless humans with big red eyes) and just look like a bipedal animal. also, gardevoir doesn’t have breasts for a change lol 

i don’t even think they’re related to actual feline pokemon, considering their placement in the amorphous egg group as opposed to something like the field egg group. IMO their closest evolutionary relatives are probably Gengar, and probably share a common ancestor since Gengar is Also in the amorphous group and Also has fairly mammalian traits. this isn’t to say that the Ralts line evolved from Gengar, it’s more like they are evolutionary cousins, though likely very distant, with Gengar being a much older and much more basal species. 

anyway, the line does have traits that are commonly associated with carnivores, but this doesn’t inherently mean they would be carnivores. frugivorous fruit bats and herbivorous (and occasionally insectivorous) gorillas, for example, have fangs, but are not carnivores. fangs can have purposes besides shearing meat and tearing into flesh, such as opening tough fruit peels and for display (as mentioned in the image)

sharp claws can also have purposes besides attacking and gripping prey. the Ralts line likely doesn’t have very dexterous hands and has a rather poor grip. having only 3 fingers, one of which is sort of a thumb, but doesn’t have the dexterity of a true thumb, and no real palm, isn’t too great for a creature’s ability to properly grip when it needs to.

i mean its psychokinetic powers ARE a thing, but they’re still animals and thus would evolve in ways that make things like getting to a safe space (something climbing a tree could do, especially for a more limber member of the species) and accessing food (something being able to open a fruit would do) more possible.

also i’m not really under the impression that the species does Everything with psychokinetic powers and largely use them primarily when they are needed, they’re not as frail as the Abra line. some individuals might enjoy having some fun with their psychic abilities, but they are capable of doing things like foraging without them (though they do allow them to transport larger amounts of food without much effort). and using your own hands to do things generally feels more natural than otherwise, i figure. they have hands, so might as well use them if they can, right?

also the individuals shown in the image are pretty much “standard”, but aren’t exactly considered ideal, for contests anyway. i imagine that there are ideals humans have placed for how a pokemon should look, and it applies particularly to contest pokemon.

the Gallade shown in the image, for example, is scrawnier and lighter (in weight) than what is considered ideal, and its coat is not vibrant and bold enough. being captive it does have the expected clipped hip hair, like most gallades do. 

in my headcanon gallades aren’t really a natural progression of the species, and are primarily the result of selective breeding. some gardevoirs probably have vestigial arm spines (IDK about what the mega evolutions would be like but when a gardevoir mega evolves it probably does have small arm spines, and that could be why its physical attack raises for no apparent reason, i mean with how it is drawn that could work…) that largely don’t really serve any purpose but some people in Sinnoh figured it’d be a good idea to breed a Physically Strong, Masculine Version of Gardevoir, and Many Generations Later, gallades became an established variant of the species, and don’t naturally occur in the wild. “Wild” gallade populations are technically “feral” gallades, either having escaped captivity or being released.

i mean that’s probably a bit of a complicated explanation for why they exist considering in-game they just evolve using a dawn stone but … i just like to think of pokemon in a more realistic way? and it would help explain why gallade is kinda…. out of place compared to the others. especially when the species isn’t even sexually dimorphic to begin with…..

Ralts’ “contest suitability” isn’t very important since ralts is a baby and thus not usually considered ready for contests, or really anything. they still need to grow.

the Gardevoir and Kirlia are mainly too scruffy and probably dirty (especially gardevoir since it has all that long fur dragging on the ground, i’m sure lots of dirt, leaves, and twigs get stuck in it and its dirtiness is even more obvious because the fur is white/off-white; i do think they wash it to some degree though and do groom and try to get any leaves and sticks out of their fur) and generally the fur is expected to be trimmed to make the bottom straight across and even, and the fur should be brushed out so that it has a smooth appearance.

they also don’t have vibrant enough coats to fit the Ideal Appearance. they’re largely still Very Very Average specimens, though, just a little messy because they’re wild lol

also for some reason kirlia in this image strikes me as especially feline-like

Related content
Comments: 51

Shinwa-Tsuki [2023-09-06 05:08:35 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

iosghwervhn [2023-07-21 08:50:05 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

re10084441 [2020-05-24 19:37:50 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

L3yozman [2019-08-11 20:07:44 +0000 UTC]

ALSO SEEN THIS IN SAFARI. /:

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Bonniecakes [2019-02-27 16:52:37 +0000 UTC]

*sees Ralts*

Fluffy boi. OwO

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

EsmeMarion [2018-12-13 16:10:40 +0000 UTC]

Hi, I know you don't use this account anymore, but I designed my Pokesona around this headcanon :'D


never delete this, holy shit <3

👍: 2 ⏩: 0

Gumzilla13 [2018-05-13 04:43:40 +0000 UTC]

This is great! The attention to detail is great! Perhaps we could get a shiny version and what the megas would look like?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

x-lazulith-x In reply to Gumzilla13 [2018-06-11 10:32:02 +0000 UTC]

thank you! i've done a shiny mega gardevoir in a similar style to this before actually: Mega Gardevoir

perhaps in the future i should revisit this and do mega gallade as well

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

FallaffatheLamaQueen [2018-01-06 18:45:49 +0000 UTC]

These are some really cool headcanons. Do you mind if I take inspiration from this for my depiction of the Ralts line in a story I'm writing? Especially with how they're physically depicted and the origin of the Gallade evolution. 

👍: 1 ⏩: 1

x-lazulith-x In reply to FallaffatheLamaQueen [2018-06-11 10:30:04 +0000 UTC]

i don't mind at all, go right ahead! i'd love to read your story and see how you depict the Ralts line so it'd be sweet if you send me a link when it's available ^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FallaffatheLamaQueen In reply to x-lazulith-x [2018-06-15 12:37:44 +0000 UTC]

Thank you very much

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

CartoonCats101 [2017-06-20 18:14:23 +0000 UTC]

*reads description*


Coolest headcanon I have seen in I don't even know how long (and considering what I've seen, that's saying a lot). Brilliant work as always. 👍



P.S. I only just noticed this right before posting this comment; the top head spikes on Gardevoir and Gallade look like cat ears. That's so cute! 😁

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

x-lazulith-x In reply to CartoonCats101 [2017-06-26 02:09:44 +0000 UTC]

thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

P57s-Leonean-Artwork [2017-05-28 19:54:45 +0000 UTC]

Wow! Your style works wonderfully for the Ralts family! What I especially like about their design here is that they aren't too far off from the original version. Well... Maybe with the exception for Kirlia, but that's mainly because I'm so used to seeing it's original form, tip-toeing like a ballet dancer.

Also, you managed to keep them faithful while putting your own spin on things, which I LOVE. What I love even MORE than that, is how how managed to make Gardevoir "cute" as opposed to "sexy." I've seen countless Gardevoir redesigns where they're either too effeminate (which inherently isn't a bad thing, but when a species is supposed to be 50/50 male or female, that's a problem), or too human, but again, you made a good choice making them more like a cross between an elf and a werecat. 

And don't worry about your version of Gallade. If anything, I think you improved it! I've never been a big fan of the bulging pelvic area, either, so that "fur kilt" thing was an excellent workaround. You also made it even MORE dangerous by giving it red elbow spikes, which is AWESOME for a Fighting Type! 

All in all, I absolutely ADORE your version of the Ralts line, including some of your newer additions. Good stuff! 8D

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

x-lazulith-x In reply to P57s-Leonean-Artwork [2017-06-26 01:59:44 +0000 UTC]

thank you very much ♥

I tried to keep them faithful the best I could, just with a more naturalistic approach. I don't really like the reinterpretations of the line that change them too much, since I really like them as they are. (On Kirlia, if it helps it actually IS on its toes; i made the species digitigrade to reflect that—so it appears like it is always tip-toeing but it is actually walking in the way that is completely natural for it)

and yes! I like to see Gardevoir as a "cute" pokemon. I also see it as a pretty and even majestic creature, but when I see it I always think of how cute it is. The "sexy" designs just kind of weird me out tbh. It doesn't really help that they ultimately have to change a lot about the original design to make it anywhere near "sexy." Gardevoir's original design is very gender neutral, I feel. I never saw it as a "pretty lady in a dress", but more of a "magic knight in a robe."

I don't really like the too human designs either. Its shape is barely human (it's bipedal but not really anything else... it's frame is so willowy and delicate, its hands are more like paws, it has such long and thin legs that, in the official design, basically end in points, and its head and eyes are very big and the rest of its face is pretty small. and its eyes are red and its "skin" [which I chose to render as fur but some see it as skin] is milk white. It would look kind of scary and weird if it was drawn like a human.) so it just doesn't make sense to me to portray it as a human. It doesn't seem very appealing either. I like them as furry elves. I think bird interpretations are cool too.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

BlueSunStudios [2017-04-19 15:45:59 +0000 UTC]

Right next to TipsyRa1d3n 's depiction of Gardevoir in their Field Study of the species, this is one of my favorite depictions of the Ralts line. With their overwhelmingly human-like appearance, I was thoroughly convinced that the whole line were POKéMON-based offshoots of the human race from a long time ago (like how I feel most Human-Shape POKéMON are), and this got me to see them in a somewhat different light thanks to it making sense to me. Good job on the art and the explanation!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

x-lazulith-x In reply to BlueSunStudios [2017-06-26 02:08:35 +0000 UTC]

thank you! ^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Panda196 [2017-04-08 15:58:12 +0000 UTC]

This is nothing like the ralts family. Nothing! Stop trying to shove your headcanon down my throat!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Gumzilla13 In reply to Panda196 [2018-05-13 04:40:57 +0000 UTC]

No one said they was shoving their headcanon down anyone's throat. This post is simply an idea/theory. At a scientific standpoint this makes total sense. It doesn't have to be 1-1 with the source material.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Panda196 [2017-04-04 01:54:50 +0000 UTC]

Adanel I've yet to find someone more retarded than you

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

GMCPaints In reply to Panda196 [2017-05-25 14:50:56 +0000 UTC]

wow you are one of the meanest person i ever found on deviantart. and i encountered MANY MEAN PEOPLE ON DEVIANART!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Panda196 In reply to GMCPaints [2017-05-25 20:21:18 +0000 UTC]

I don't care, he deserves it

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

GMCPaints In reply to Panda196 [2017-05-29 14:47:56 +0000 UTC]

no, he did not , what did he write anyway?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Panda196 In reply to GMCPaints [2017-05-29 14:49:12 +0000 UTC]

He's just a retard

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

GMCPaints In reply to Panda196 [2017-05-29 18:51:33 +0000 UTC]

if you have no reason, other than you saying "he is a retard", then you realy should'nt say anything. just tell me what he wrote to upset you maybe i can understand.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Adanel [2017-01-21 12:37:41 +0000 UTC]

I love it!^^
The fact that their long fur would be dirty makes it even better!^^ Gardevoir are too often pictured as "perfectly clean". That's such a breath of fresh air!!
And finally someone who acknowledges this is NOT a dress, and is NOT removable!! *-* I love you for this!! I mean, it's so visible that it's part of their body!!

Even though I don't see them as cat-like either, this interpretation is really creative and believable!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

x-lazulith-x In reply to Adanel [2017-06-26 01:40:42 +0000 UTC]

Thank you! ♥

It only made sense to portray them a little dirty and scuffed up, I did intend to show wild members of the species here after all. I believe owners of captive Gardevoir would clean and maintain their fur, much like how owners of those dogs with the long, flowy hair would keep their dogs groomed.

and yes! I kind of dislike the portrayals that have gardevoir with removable "dresses" tbh... I'm glad to see the sentiment is shared ^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Adanel In reply to x-lazulith-x [2017-06-26 10:33:09 +0000 UTC]

That was a very good idea!
Now I can only imagine the owner of a freshly caught gardevoir trying to clean it!^^

I'm glad about that too!! It makes so much more sense this way, really! ^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

PtarmiganTheIcewing [2016-08-20 19:15:13 +0000 UTC]

I have a headcanon about Gallade. I think male Kirlia will always become a Gallade, and a dawn stone simply increases growth speed, and that Hoenn Kirlia have for some reason, more estrogen released during puberty, which causes them to look  more like Gardevoirs.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

x-lazulith-x In reply to PtarmiganTheIcewing [2016-08-24 06:23:00 +0000 UTC]

that reason could have to do with the food and water they consume causing them to have more estrogen in their systems and stunting androgen production.

it is not a bad headcanon, and it makes sense, even if i don't personally share it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

babychilliam [2016-06-11 14:50:43 +0000 UTC]

Yess, i'm not the only person who see's this family as foxes/bunnies/cats or any fuzzy animal!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

x-lazulith-x In reply to babychilliam [2016-06-12 03:51:55 +0000 UTC]

glad to see someone else shares this headcanon! them being fuzzy catlike creatures is cute headcanon, and it works pretty well with their official designs. i mean, they have pretty catlike eyes and other things that just make them seem vaguely catlike

and,, just imagine a little fluffy ralts purring.... it'd be the cutest thing,,

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

babychilliam In reply to x-lazulith-x [2016-06-12 17:51:19 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, I always saw them as rabbit like creatures because this line's color reminded me of the white rabbit that have red eyes, much like the Ralts line. I've also seen the "dress" on them as overgrown fur, and I always thought kirlia's horns looked like bunny ears for some reason ^.^
And yeah, little Ralts purring would be adorable~

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

PerfectChaos22 [2016-06-01 20:29:08 +0000 UTC]

Really like how similar they look to their original depictions but at the same the art has its own...flare and subtle difference

Are you gonna do more Pokemon by any chance, would love to see more of your interpretations

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

x-lazulith-x In reply to PerfectChaos22 [2016-06-01 22:57:51 +0000 UTC]

thank you! i was aiming for them to still look like they originally do, but with some changes to make them a bit more realistic and animal-like

i definitely will be doing more pokemon. stuff like this is really fun to do

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PerfectChaos22 In reply to x-lazulith-x [2016-06-01 23:26:59 +0000 UTC]

Yay, would love to see your interpretation on really human like Pokemon such as Jynx or Mr.Mime

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Primaltimediamond [2016-06-01 12:18:40 +0000 UTC]

this is really cute! amazing headcannon ^^ mind if i borrow the gallade bit for my frosslass headcannon? (since it's kinda a similar situation)

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

x-lazulith-x In reply to Primaltimediamond [2016-06-01 19:29:33 +0000 UTC]

thank you! no i don't mind, go ahead.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

shadow-wasser [2016-05-31 01:52:40 +0000 UTC]

I can't say I share your headcanon (I see the Ralts line as more birdlike) but I like your thought process and art. I also like your explanation for the existence of Gallade! I would love to see if you decide to do more of these.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

x-lazulith-x In reply to shadow-wasser [2016-05-31 03:17:57 +0000 UTC]

that's fine! i really like seeing other headcanons for the line, they have a very ambiguous design so it's interesting to see what other people see in them.

your idea of them being birdlike makes sense. the species' coloring, being white and green with red eyes, is definitely something that might be seen on an avian, and their cheek "spikes" could be seen as feathers. birds are also warm-blooded, and based on the pokedex, the Ralts line likely are as well: "If its horns capture the warm feelings of people or Pokémon, its body warms up slightly." i can definitely see them being birdlike animals.

though if i'm completely honest, i'm happy with pretty much anything that doesn't look like a pretty human haha those are really the only interpretation of the line i actually dislike. they don't even look like humans in the official art aside from? being bipedal i guess? and that aside it's generally just.... kinda lazy and the most obvious and uninteresting interpretation tbh

and thank you! i don't really have details for gallade's background, but selective captive breeding is the idea that makes the most sense to me, as opposed to Gallade being some kind of secret evolution that the Hoenn population of the species just couldn't access because they needed a special rock. i mean something like that is perfectly fine for in-game purposes, but not as much for things like creating a realism-based interpretation on how a species works biologically.

i most likely will be doing more realistic/semi-realistic pokemon art! there really needs to be more of it out there, particularly the kind where the pokemon are portrayed as being like actual believable animals and not just horrible monsters. unfortunately most "realistic" pokemon art is just horrifying for no reason :/ sometimes they even make eevees look creepy and weird....

i figure the best way to add more of the kind of realistic pokemon artwork i like to see (that is actually realistic and not just hyperdetailed and grotesque) would be to contribute my own

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

shadow-wasser In reply to x-lazulith-x [2016-06-02 07:09:58 +0000 UTC]

Yeah! Especially if you then see the 'horns' as something like the crest on a cassowary!

Hm! I've been leaning towards the 'selectively bred variety' headcanon for "Mega" evolutions, but have been trying to find alternate explanations for special branching evolutions and the like, with variable success. Honestly, quite a few families have me throwing up my hands and just calling them different species...

Heh, I think the 'creepy realistic' art is creepy on purpose. It's just different stylizations, and everyone has their own take. I agree that overly-grotesque isn't really 'realistic' but ehh.

Can't wait to see more of your work! I have to admit though, I did like this piece better with the 'side sketches' and notes, rather than the straight image.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

x-lazulith-x In reply to shadow-wasser [2016-06-02 08:10:02 +0000 UTC]

same to be honest. there's families that make sense and are easy to interpret as the first stage being the pokemon's youth, and its final stage being adulthood. then there are the ones that change really drastically between stages and have weird branched evolutions and are pretty confusing....

usually in those cases i just understand the pokemon to be related species probably under the same genus (or at the least in the same subfamily), but not the same species. it makes more sense that way, i think. and when you throw mega evolution into the mix things get even more confusing, because mega evolution is apparently a temporary change, which is ??? i don't know how that would even work

i don't mind "creepy realistic" art for some pokemon, because there are definitely pokemon that would be pretty creepy, scary, or gross-looking if they were rendered realistically, it just doesn't make sense for other pokemon that are cute/beautiful and are based on cute/beautiful animals. though i wouldn't care about that at all if people just didn't call grotesque nightmarish pikachus and eevees and skitties "realistic" lol

honestly i prefer having the side-sketches and notes, it made the image less "empty" but what i have for now is mostly a stand-in until i find a way to add all that stuff in but better-arranged and cleaner and more "professional"-looking (i suppose? i just don't want it to look like it would belong in scraps) but i'm definitely still keeping the original available for viewing until then

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

shadow-wasser In reply to x-lazulith-x [2016-06-02 17:23:07 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, and it's not just the 'drastic change,' since some RL animals change pretty drastically too (most insects and ocean invertebrates have really weird looking larval stages, and some fish too), but some changes make no sense? Like, say, Geodude, which gains extra limbs as a Graveler then loses them as a Golem? Or Wartortle gaining fluffy ears and a tail and then losing them, or Mudkip's tail fin 'splitting' when it becomes Marshtomp, then it has one fin again as Swampert?

Yeah, that kind of thing.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

x-lazulith-x In reply to shadow-wasser [2016-06-02 20:48:17 +0000 UTC]

yeah not necessarily "drastic" but definitely strange. mostly the drastic changes being weird apply to certain pokemon that aren't really amphibian or insect-like, or even fish, and thus wouldn't undergo metamorphosis (which is pretty much the main way an animal would change a lot, including its body plan overall changing) so pokemon like Butterfree or Dustox, while they go through drastic changes, are very believable because they're insects

and then there are things like Dragonair's evolution to Dragonite (unless you see it as an amphibian thing), Nidorino/Nidorina becoming Nidoking/Nidoqueen (???? they turn bipedal and become like 3 times bigger), and the entire Gastly line (though this depends on if you see them as actual ghosts, in which case going from a floating ball with a face to a spiky floating head with floating hands to a creature that walks on the ground and has a body and arms and legs can just be explained by It's a Ghost, but if you see them as more like animals thought to be ghosts it gets pretty confusing), among others...

in situations like that it's a lot easier to just interpret the pokemon as being another species

and there's the whole thing where some pokemon evolve by trade. no idea how something like that would work

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

shadow-wasser In reply to x-lazulith-x [2016-06-04 04:28:53 +0000 UTC]

Yeah... for my own work I tend to just kind of ignore the special item requirements and trade evolutions.... though I should probably come up with something else that's more creative, when I revise it.

Oh man, I've been having fun figuring out the ghosts. Imagine Gastly as an amphibian-like larva, surrounding its body in hallucinogen-laced slime. Haunter grows one set of limbs, and Gengar is then a froglike creature.

Maybe 'trading' could be interpreted as more like 'migration'? so a pokemon has to travel to change, or.... Maybe it's a stress response to moving? Or a hormonal change catalyzed by becoming 'dominant' (that is, its previous 'alpha'/owner losing ownership? i dunno.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

x-lazulith-x In reply to shadow-wasser [2016-06-04 07:01:49 +0000 UTC]

how to explain weird evolutions is really a case-by-case thing imo. like Alakazam's trade by evolution thing can easily just be ignored and it could be interpreted as just being Abra's fully mature state, Slowking could be viewed as not being an actual evolution for Slowpoke considering it's essentially a bigger stronger Slowpoke that got bitten on the head by a Shellder (and the shellder can be removed, so if that's taken off of it it's pretty much just like any other slowpoke; if anything the shellder evolved since it looks completely different, unless it's not the shellder we are familiar with and it's a similar mollusk creature that the pokedex is just calling a shellder), and Politoed and Poliwrath could be regional species that share very similar/nearly identical larval and juvenile stages

ghost pokemon in general are definitely the most abstract and hard to figure out. the Gastly line is a lot easier to interpret as some kind of creature than things like Litwick or Honedge. that interpretation of Gastly is pretty neat though, and could definitely work, considering that amphibians do go through stages like that. i'm fairly partial to an almost wingless bat-like creature Gengar personally (a lot due to gengar's similarities to the cheshire cat, and also its ears) but froglike gengar could work pretty well. there are some weird anatomical things regarding gengar that make anuran gengar pretty weird like having a tail and ear things, but it does pretty well for explaining the weird evolution it goes through

i really have no idea how trading by evolution would even be properly explained in a way that makes biological sense. it seems more like an in-game mechanic than anything else tbh

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

shadow-wasser In reply to x-lazulith-x [2016-06-05 02:27:15 +0000 UTC]

Agreed, regarding trade evolutions and weird evolutions in general.

As for the ghosts, I look at them as an exciting challenge (honestly, the humanoid pokemon are harder for me). Honedge could be a kind of Orthoconic nautilus (that is, a nautilus with a straight, cone-shaped shell), or even some kind of pelagic tube worm. Litwick might be a tube worm or caddisfly-like larva of some sort, and Lampent and Chandelure are cephalopod-like.

 I tend to view pokemon as an entirely different evolutionary path than RL animals, perhaps an 'alternate' earth or the like. So a 'froglike' pokemon with a tail is not an issue, as it doesn't have to be a proper anuran. It's just a separate classification of amphibious creature with a resemblance to frogs.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

x-lazulith-x In reply to shadow-wasser [2016-06-05 03:34:09 +0000 UTC]

the humanoid pokemon are pretty odd too. some of them i don't really have much trouble with (machop line could be some kind of synapsid-like creature, drowzee would be similar to a tapir, abra line could be goatlike, gothita line could be weird almost furby-like bird things) and then there are others where they're just.... something....

that's a neat interpretation of Honedge, I can definitely see it as being like a nautilus. Its blue sash thing could be tentacles, and whether its eyes would be the white circle things on its sheath (though they might make more sense as eye spots) or the blue thing on its guard it does actually have some resemblance to a nautilus' eye. and i took a look at tube worms and quite a few look almost candle-like, it'd suit litwick pretty well

and that's true! actually that's pretty much how i view most pokemon as well, a lot of them either have only superficial similarities to certain RL animals (they look similar to a certain kind of animal, but are their own unique thing entirely), or they would be related/similar to a RL group of animals but still belong to their own group (like my interpretation of Eevee and its evolutions; i think of them as feliforms but belong to their own family that is characterized by being 'foxlike' feliforms)

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ArtificialCabbage [2016-05-30 23:51:37 +0000 UTC]

This right here is probably the best headcanon/semi-realistic interpretation on the Ralts line I've seen and I think I'm starting to believe it myself XD

Great job ^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

x-lazulith-x In reply to ArtificialCabbage [2016-05-31 02:38:50 +0000 UTC]

thank you very much! i'm glad you liked my interpretation, especially enough to think it's one of the best

👍: 0 ⏩: 0