HOME | DD

Published: 2013-04-21 04:50:49 +0000 UTC; Views: 2797; Favourites: 8; Downloads: 3
Redirect to original
Description
The WNBA is especially plagued with the spirit of homosexuality.Related content
Comments: 718
ChrisTheMemeQueen In reply to ??? [2014-10-27 01:20:44 +0000 UTC]
To all the commenters - I know we all wanna defend our stance, and as much of an asshole move this art is, this person doesn't seem to be moved by a word. Don't overexert yourselves with things like these, and just focus on being hella gay and staying awesome
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Xiao-Fury In reply to ChrisTheMemeQueen [2014-10-27 17:33:43 +0000 UTC]
Wow, real inspiring.
Fail.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ChrisTheMemeQueen In reply to Xiao-Fury [2014-10-27 19:36:50 +0000 UTC]
Okay yknow I was trying to be nice and not call you out on your utter bullshit but clearly your skull is so fucking thick that nothing gets through it. Or have you just decided to not read the comments and be a dick about all this?
I'm a Christian. A devout one at that. I help out with church services fairly often. I'm also gay as fuck. My partner and I, as a matter of fact, are BOTH Christian and intend to one day take our children to church if they decide they too want to be Christian.
Not to mention, I like dressing like a boy sometimes. I like baggy clothes that don't fit me.
Neither of these facts make me less of a Christian.
Christian is defined as (and I quote) 'a person who has received Christian baptism or is a believer in Jesus Christ and his teachings.'
I have received baptism. I've been confirmed. I believe strongly in Jesus, and let me be frank, NOBODY follows everything in the bible.
People shave. People eat lobster. People pull out when they have sex. All things strictly banned in the bible. But do people follow this? Of course not. Everyone focuses on the homosexuality aspect.
God loves everyone equally. I'm not going to hell for my lifestyle. I'm not sinning by being who I am.
Neither are the people commenting on this calling you out on your discrimination. We are all equal in the eyes of whatever power we believe in.
Christianity is about loving one another.
Or did you just skip that part?
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Xiao-Fury In reply to ChrisTheMemeQueen [2014-10-28 05:58:09 +0000 UTC]
No. That wasn't being nice. That was trying to sound smart and insulting....which is why you failed, but you can try again if you want to.
Please. You're a Christian using potty mouth and supporting a sin that is labeled as an abomination throughout the Word. RIGHT.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ChrisTheMemeQueen In reply to Xiao-Fury [2014-10-28 19:43:26 +0000 UTC]
Well, talking the way I do makes me no less of a Christian, clearly proven by your insane hate speech, yet you're still one.
God tells us to love everyone and from a young age we are taught this. It should always hold true. And it does.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Xiao-Fury In reply to ChrisTheMemeQueen [2014-10-29 07:48:54 +0000 UTC]
Well of course the Lord says love everybody, but where does the Lord say love your sin??
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ChrisTheMemeQueen In reply to Xiao-Fury [2014-10-29 11:12:53 +0000 UTC]
Everybody sins and we still love them.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Xiao-Fury In reply to ChrisTheMemeQueen [2014-10-29 19:59:19 +0000 UTC]
But does the Lord says love sin?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ChrisTheMemeQueen In reply to Xiao-Fury [2014-11-01 20:23:37 +0000 UTC]
The Lord says love thy neighbor. And nowhere does he say DON'T love sin.
Now then. Let me make one thing clear. I just now came back from a 3-day conference and over the course of it my friend has told me the shitty stuff you told her, and she's told me you made her physically ILL. Do you feel happy spreading your ill-willed faith and doing this to people? I will not tolerate you doing this to someone I love.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Xiao-Fury In reply to ChrisTheMemeQueen [2014-11-03 21:22:15 +0000 UTC]
The truth is known to make people sick. She should consider that as a blessing. God can save her if she takes in the truth instead of fighting it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ChrisTheMemeQueen In reply to Xiao-Fury [2014-11-03 22:17:43 +0000 UTC]
Bitch, fuck off. She's already been saved. In the church, anyone is saved if they believe in God. There is no VIP club for straight white cisgendered people. ANYONE gets into heaven.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Xiao-Fury In reply to ChrisTheMemeQueen [2014-11-04 02:58:44 +0000 UTC]
I guess she's as saved as you are, huh? Anyone can believe in the Lord, but that doesn't mean they are His followers. Your excessive potty mouth and support of sexual sins speaks volume of who you follow. It certainly isn't Christ.
Thou believest that there is one God; thou doest well: the devils also believe, and tremble (James 2:19)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ChrisTheMemeQueen In reply to Xiao-Fury [2014-11-04 22:04:36 +0000 UTC]
Clearly you aren't worth the effort to argue with
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
TraumaChick777 In reply to ChrisTheMemeQueen [2014-10-27 21:11:31 +0000 UTC]
Fucking owned her ass right there
Too bad she has her head so far up hers, maybe she'd hear it better
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Xiao-Fury In reply to TraumaChick777 [2014-10-28 05:53:25 +0000 UTC]
Yeah that speech was as inspiring as watching paint dry.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
TraumaChick777 In reply to Xiao-Fury [2014-10-28 09:01:54 +0000 UTC]
And your logic is about as sturdy as a piece or rotted balsa
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Xiao-Fury In reply to TraumaChick777 [2014-10-28 16:51:58 +0000 UTC]
Yet it gets attention...must be working if people are coming like bees to honey.
However way I get the word out on telling men who think they are women (or the other way around) that they are wrong and need help...I'll take it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
TraumaChick777 In reply to Xiao-Fury [2014-10-28 18:08:29 +0000 UTC]
Don't flatter yourself. The main reason this had gotten so much attention is because people are pointing out all of the flaws in your "logic."
By the way, the DSM V does NOT consider being trans to be a mental disorder. Who do you think I'll trust, a peer-reviewed psychiatric guide or some deluded sheep on the internet?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Xiao-Fury In reply to TraumaChick777 [2014-10-29 08:02:56 +0000 UTC]
No one has debunked it yet. So far they're just throwing out names.
I guess the DSMV doesn't considered anorexia to be a mental disorder either.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
TraumaChick777 In reply to Xiao-Fury [2014-10-29 09:41:53 +0000 UTC]
Riiiight... You just keep on believing that.
www.dsm5.org/Documents/changes…
It doesn't call it anorexia (I believe it's called 'restrictive food intake disorder' or something along the lines of that) but it's in there alright.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Xiao-Fury In reply to TraumaChick777 [2014-10-29 20:01:36 +0000 UTC]
They look in the mirror and see someone out of shape. We call that a mental disorder.
A man looks in the mirror and sees a woman. We call that healthy???
Don't you see how insane that is?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
TraumaChick777 In reply to Xiao-Fury [2014-10-29 21:10:07 +0000 UTC]
It isn't insane. People disagree with the sex they were assigned at birth, and different people go to different lengths to feel more comfortable with themselves. Being transgender =/= being 'psychotic' 'delusional' or 'insane' Source: debunkingdenialism.com/2013/12… Want more? Ask any psychologist worth their license, chances are they'll tell you the same thing (I know that the ones I've been to have told me that it's not a psychiatric disease)
So, anorexia is just someone 'seeing themselves as overweight when they're not?' You REALLY don't know what you're talking about, do you?
womenshealth.gov/publications/… From what I've heard from people who have struggled with the disease, it CONSUMES them. Anorexia has the highest mortality rate of all eating disorders. But congratulations on trivializing eating disorders, you ignorant fucktrumpet. More info and some statistics on eating disorders: www.anad.org/get-information/a…
I have a very strong feeling you're going to just ignore all of the sources I've given you and pull another bullshit argument out of your ass. Am I right, or am I right?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Xiao-Fury In reply to TraumaChick777 [2014-10-30 05:13:03 +0000 UTC]
So if a man who is born a man (which can be easily proven genetically) suddenly says that he is a woman, that's not insane, but if a skinny man looks in the mirror and says that he is fat, that's a mental disorder....talk about being an enabler.
The life style of homosexuality is riddled in drug abuse, promiscuity that is far higher than man/woman promiscuity, and reckless sex and suicide. Even the CDC states the dangers of said life style, and their as liberal as a democrat. www.dakotavoice.com/2010/03/ne…
To LITERALLY look in the mirror and see someone other than yourself is a mental disorder...to say that it isn't is also a mental disorder.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
TraumaChick777 In reply to Xiao-Fury [2014-10-30 09:24:16 +0000 UTC]
Seriously, you're so predictable it's not even funny. I just knew you would pull another bullshit argument on me like that, and surprise surprise!
Did you even read any of the articles I sent you on anorexia? The disease ravages your body and leaves a permanent scar on the mind. Many people with the disease also have the symptoms of depression, are you gonna say that's not a mental illness either?
Yeah, no. Read that about page for Dakotavoice, and it says that they're a news site that maintains "a biblical, Christian worldview. (A.k.a it's biased towards Christians; use scientific sources please)" Also, looked up the CDC on homosexuality. It does say that gay people are more likely to commit suicide, use drugs, etc. BUT, according to them, it's die to discrimination, homophobia, and stigma against them. Don't believe me? www.cdc.gov/msmhealth/stigma-a…
Again, who to listen to on whether or not being trans is a mental illness... Countless licensed psychologists who have gone through medical school and actually know what a mental illness is/trusted peer-reviewed medical texts. or someone who probably can't tell her ass/mouth from a hole in the ground.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Xiao-Fury In reply to TraumaChick777 [2014-10-30 10:18:03 +0000 UTC]
So if one day you call yourself the opposite sex, I have to play stupid and believe you? And you seriously believe that it's not a mental disorder. Very well. Dogs are wingless birds related to candle sticks. Tomorrow, I will be an purple squid. You can't call me insane because that's the orientation I abide by.
Let's all be opposite day!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
TraumaChick777 In reply to Xiao-Fury [2014-10-30 10:43:31 +0000 UTC]
You're pathetic, you know that? The APA and the DMS V all agree that being transgender is NOT a mental illness, but you decide to ignore all science and cling to your asinine beliefs and then hide behind your religion.
By the way, sex and gender are two different concepts (www.apa.org/topics/lgbt/transg… .
But you're just gonna spit on everything and spew more bullshit, I just fucking know you will.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Xiao-Fury In reply to TraumaChick777 [2014-10-30 20:28:11 +0000 UTC]
You're the one who believes that a man can say he's woman just because he says so. Yet I'm the pathetic one. lol Therefore, I am a cat. I have no evidence of it, but hey...if a man can call himself a woman just because he identifies as one, then I am a cat, and your're a moose. Look, your little researchers are as looney as transgender people. That is what you call ENABLERS.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
TraumaChick777 In reply to Xiao-Fury [2014-10-30 21:26:58 +0000 UTC]
I... I'm sorry. Did you just call the American Psychogical Assiciations researchers loony? Excuse me while I laugh my ass off. You're the one who believes that a 2000-year-old religious text that's subject to different interpretations is more reliable than a scientific organization, so I'd say that it's more likely than not you're HIGHLY delusional! I mean, honestly!
Also, I think you resemble a jellyfish more than a cat since, y'know, cats have brains and all.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Xiao-Fury In reply to TraumaChick777 [2014-10-31 02:52:49 +0000 UTC]
YES. I did.
Actually, during the 1970's, the APA had homosexuality in the list of mental illnesses, but it was later pulled not because the findings were incorrect, but because people just got their feelings hurt.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
TraumaChick777 In reply to Xiao-Fury [2014-10-31 03:07:20 +0000 UTC]
Or maybe it's because people know more now than they did back then? Because they actually did RESEARCH?
Honestly, someone who thinks an outdated spiritual text is more accurate than a respected medical organization... What a fucking joke.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Xiao-Fury In reply to TraumaChick777 [2014-10-31 04:36:41 +0000 UTC]
No. It was really because the homosexuals were offended at the findings. It was nothing good, so they did like how you and your angry friends are doing: nag and complain.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
LucianTheDemon In reply to ??? [2014-10-01 22:37:09 +0000 UTC]
I worship God, and I'm not lesbian nor straight. I am both. I am Pansexual.
Does this mean I am sinful?
"Love thy neighbor."
That includes people who are gay or lesbian.
A sexual orientation does not make one person differ from another person. It is what makes them happy.
God wants his children to be happy. It is more sinful to call someone sinful for their sexual orientation rather than someone not being straight.
Pertaining to wearing clothes. Generally, people who are straight yet wear clothes from the other sex (not gender. SEX.) cannot find the clothing they enjoy most that is made for them.
All of our stores here do not have any Sonic the Hedgehog shirts for female. I have to end up getting a shirt from the male's section. Every so often, there is a shirt for a female, for I have only one. If wearing a shirt is what causes lesbianism, then I don't know what causes people to be straight. Wearing a male shirt, or even COSPLAYING, does not determine your gender. All it determines is personal preference and interest. One peeking into another business of one by judging them based on what they enjoy most is very sinful.
A true Christian sees Athiests as real people. A true Christian sees everyone equal, no matter their sexual orientation or clothings. A true Christian cares for everyone, and isn't a close-minded sheep.
I also happen to notice you've been using the Bible for arguments.
I am a Christian, and so are you (which is hard to believe). Even I, as a Christian, know not to use the Bible as an argument. Proving your points with a book does absolutely nothing. The Bible was not written by God himself, only written by people. People never know the exact true story, only what they know of it. Paraphrasing and not getting the exact facts from real events is a big possibility, and it has happened in every nonfiction book. Including the Bible.
Now, answer me this. If God treats everyone equal and loves all his children, why would one be unrepentant for having a different sexual orientation than yours? Why would one be "one of the devil" if God loves everyone? The Ten Commandments are much stronger than the Bible will ever be, even if the Bible is strong in its own right.
You ma'am, are very wrong and close-minded. The Bible is not and no one's everything. It is only but a guide. God loves everyone, even lesbians and gays.
Stop in your tracks and re-think yourself.
(Also, reading the comment below, your logic is telling me that boys are also brothers, meaning a boy and girl are brother and sister, meaning no one can love. GOOD JOB.)
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
glovannas In reply to LucianTheDemon [2016-02-06 15:30:41 +0000 UTC]
I FUCKING LOVE THIS COMMENT
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Xiao-Fury In reply to LucianTheDemon [2014-10-02 05:10:19 +0000 UTC]
God said this:
But from the beginning of the creation God made them male and female (Mark 10:6).
22 Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination (Lev. 18)
5 The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man, neither shall a man put on a woman's garment: for all that do so are abomination unto the Lord thy God (Deut. 22)
God said this:
But go ye and learn what that meaneth, I will have mercy, and not sacrifice: for I am not come to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance (Matthew 9:13)
God, speaking through Paul, said this-
Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, 10 Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God. 11 And such were some of you: but ye are washed, but ye are sanctified, but ye are justified in the name of the Lord Jesus, and by the Spirit of our God (1 Corinthians 6).
You base your Christianity off of your feelings, and judging by what the Word says about your sexual sin, it is SIN. So, then you are merely a Christian by name because the Word of God clearly speaks against homosexuality. And then you completely contradict yourself when you first try to speak about how the Word says to love your neighbors, yet you say that the bible was written by men.
Two of the same sex were not designed for sexual intercourse, therefore, the only relationship that a same sex could have is brotherly or sisterly. This is the same with opposite as well. Not all opposite sex couples have to be romantically involved with each other.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Silverleaf888 In reply to ??? [2014-09-21 18:40:49 +0000 UTC]
First of all... So, I guess that apparently dressing like a guy makes you a worshipper of the devil.
Second of all, the disclaimer is vague. What exactly DOES make lesbianism sinful, if anything?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Xiao-Fury In reply to Silverleaf888 [2014-09-22 00:05:47 +0000 UTC]
Not a worshiper of the devil, but one who is deceived by the devil.
Allow me to answer a question with another question. Sister/sister sexual love is called incest, and is frowned upon. When two women who are not sisters come together, they are still likened to sisters, mother/daughter, step daughter/sister. Etc. So, if incest is frowned upon, why do you think lesbian should receive a free pass?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Silverleaf888 In reply to Xiao-Fury [2014-09-26 20:25:18 +0000 UTC]
When two women do that, it should not automatically make them likened to sisters. Anyways, if they're not sisters and are not likened to sisters or ARE likened to sisters, then it's not really incest. You're really just trying to group incest and lesbianism together.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Xiao-Fury In reply to Silverleaf888 [2014-09-27 05:46:31 +0000 UTC]
'should not'? Why? Are they not the same sex? Are sisters not the same sex?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Silverleaf888 In reply to Xiao-Fury [2014-09-29 02:42:24 +0000 UTC]
Duh, that's what "sisters" means. Two siblings of the same gender (female).
But not all women are sisters. That's stereotyping.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Xiao-Fury In reply to Silverleaf888 [2014-09-29 04:59:06 +0000 UTC]
Not biologically they are not. But women who are not related are likened to sisters. A woman who is not my sister is either my mother, my auntie, my grandma or a sisterly friend.
Bottom line is that homosexuality is just like incest.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Silverleaf888 In reply to Xiao-Fury [2014-10-02 23:31:09 +0000 UTC]
Not everyone will tell two random people that they liken them to sisters, even if they've never met. That's just sort of.. Weird.
Until you come up with a good reason that homosexuality is, and I quote, "sexual activity between siblings or close relatives," I have to disagree.
Anyways, you're either RELATED to someone or NOT related to someone. There shouldn't be such a confusion as you have.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Xiao-Fury In reply to Silverleaf888 [2014-10-03 05:56:37 +0000 UTC]
Because this was common sense once upon a time, but all a sicko has to say is that he or she is in love to cross bridges that weren't suppose to be crossed.
Ever heard of brotherly love?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Silverleaf888 In reply to Xiao-Fury [2014-10-04 00:32:17 +0000 UTC]
You're right, it WAS common sense. Now it's what we call stupid.
Yes, I've heard of brotherly love. Your point?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Xiao-Fury In reply to Silverleaf888 [2014-10-04 19:16:53 +0000 UTC]
lol...so common sense is now stupid? That explains so much.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Silverleaf888 In reply to Xiao-Fury [2014-10-07 00:53:19 +0000 UTC]
You obviously need to reread what I said, you didn't understand.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Silverleaf888 In reply to Xiao-Fury [2014-10-07 22:01:04 +0000 UTC]
Keywords "once upon a time" that you said. The rest shouldn't have to be explained.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Xiao-Fury In reply to Silverleaf888 [2014-10-07 23:44:45 +0000 UTC]
So you're saying that common sense, something this generation lacks, was always stupid...
you need to see what you're saying...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Silverleaf888 In reply to Xiao-Fury [2014-10-08 00:33:55 +0000 UTC]
You said that being against homosexuality was common sense. I said that it's now called stupid. Is it really that hard to comprehend?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
<= Prev | | Next =>