HOME | DD
Published: 2007-09-05 19:38:58 +0000 UTC; Views: 2545; Favourites: 65; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
-Waterfall"This was shot as a test with my pretty new ND filter at the time, pretty happy with it though."
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Date: July 15th, 2007
Equipment Info
Camera: Nikon D50
Lens: Nikkor 18-55mm f/3.5-5-6
Focal Length: 55mm
Tripod: Velbon CX-300
Filters: Cokin P121M (GND) & P154 (ND8)
Exposure: 16/10 at Ζ/36
Exposure Bias: 0
ISO: 200
Exposure Mode: Aperture Priority
Copyright Β© 2007 Erik Bernskiold All Rights Reserved
Edit 24th January 2008: Updated border and the description!
Related content
Comments: 52
a1000brokenhearts [2008-01-31 16:58:42 +0000 UTC]
i love waterfalls. this one's really wonderful.
π: 0 β©: 1
qbfx [2007-09-29 10:58:07 +0000 UTC]
It would've been nice if it was an HDRI so the sky would'nt be overexposed, still a nice shot, keep up!
π: 0 β©: 1
xldstudios In reply to qbfx [2007-10-04 14:26:07 +0000 UTC]
Thanks The sky was lost from the beginning
π: 0 β©: 1
qbfx In reply to xldstudios [2007-10-04 16:40:51 +0000 UTC]
haha, what do you mean ? I thought it wash out because of the long exposure if it was too light.. Anyway, I like the photo
π: 0 β©: 1
xldstudios In reply to qbfx [2007-10-04 17:15:06 +0000 UTC]
It was washed out from the long exposure, but you couldn't save it even by doing an on-computer HDR. Because doing in-camera HDR with long exposures just does not work!
π: 0 β©: 1
qbfx In reply to xldstudios [2007-10-07 12:14:16 +0000 UTC]
maybe the best way would've been to use a grad filter, or just take two photos with long and short exposure and blend them together ..
π: 0 β©: 1
xldstudios In reply to qbfx [2007-10-07 12:43:57 +0000 UTC]
Grad filter for sure, I just didn't have it available But taking two and blend is the hard way
π: 0 β©: 1
qbfx In reply to xldstudios [2007-10-07 13:15:23 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, next time when you go for some myst effect earlier than 6pm take your grad filter with you
π: 0 β©: 1
xldstudios In reply to qbfx [2007-10-07 13:20:37 +0000 UTC]
I only went for the long silky water effect, since really the whole purpose of that shoot was to try out my ND8
π: 0 β©: 1
qbfx In reply to xldstudios [2007-10-07 13:47:48 +0000 UTC]
Well I think it worked well, otherwise the whole image would've been overexposed for the same amout of motion blur on the water .. Damn, why do I tell you that, you already know it Keep up the good work
π: 0 β©: 1
mep92 [2007-09-16 15:15:25 +0000 UTC]
Very nice photo and the water looks very much like milk, but it's not too blurry or overexposed
π: 0 β©: 1
Nayomie [2007-09-14 08:49:48 +0000 UTC]
A very nice pic ! Has this been featurd ion a magazine? hhmm..Love it anyway
π: 0 β©: 1
xldstudios In reply to Nayomie [2007-09-14 09:15:04 +0000 UTC]
Nope, no feature anywhere
π: 0 β©: 0
Sequeena [2007-09-06 19:06:42 +0000 UTC]
Hi there, you have been daily featured in my journal! [link]
Thanks for your wonderful art!
π: 0 β©: 1
xldstudios In reply to Bolognist [2007-09-06 13:43:34 +0000 UTC]
Det stora vattenfallet i Botan KlipptrΓ€dgΓ₯rden!
π: 0 β©: 0
shiVaus [2007-09-05 19:39:54 +0000 UTC]
*dies once more*
Damn you and your awesome professional pics!
π: 0 β©: 1
| Next =>
























