HOME | DD
xMEGALOPOLISx β Stonehenge
Published: 2008-06-03 14:45:18 +0000 UTC; Views: 98935; Favourites: 5163; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
IR + ND, exposure: 300 sec.You can also find me on: FACEBOOK
Related content
Comments: 585
BEAUTIFUL as usual
Dude
I cant take out of my head, did you see the interview with Nigel Tufnel about the Stonehenge Decoded that National Geographic Film was Just made? everyone Watch is so freaking funny.
associated with the stonehenge, sorry.
This is sky looks so flashy and brilliant, seems like it was drew, so beautiful,, i love it
π: 0 β©: 0
What boggles me about this is ... is that a crow standing on one of the first rocks ??
π: 0 β©: 0
This is simply a beauty! This is one of your best work my dear. It leaves me breathless.
π: 0 β©: 0
I just read an article about the stone hedge, thay have found out that it has been used to burn the dead from 3000 bc to 2500 bc, but only the ones who helped building it and their families were burried/burned there.
The stones have been transportet all the way from Wales, so it must have been quite a job to make it
π: 0 β©: 0
You're best work in my opinion
π: 0 β©: 0
Fajnie wyszΕo aczkolwiek dΓ³Ε ( choΔ wiem, ze nic ruszaΕeΕ ) wyglΔ da jakbyΕ dorabiaΕ mgΕΔ w szopie. Zaznaczam. Wiem, ze nie ale tak wyglΔ da i tylko to mi siΔ nie podoba.
π: 0 β©: 0
Fantastically gorgeous, and I LOVE Stonehenge, I keep bugging my parents to bring me with them so I can go see it (but noo XD)
Amazing pic!
π: 0 β©: 0
Pierwsza Klasa, rewelacyjny efekt - pieknie wyszlo
π: 0 β©: 1
eerie and magical!!!! amazing LOOOONG exposure.
π: 0 β©: 0
This is the best photograph of Stonehenge I've seen.
π: 0 β©: 0
300sec?! PURE QUALITY!! i love night photos with long exposure... but this long! OMG! great!
π: 0 β©: 0
...beautiful image, adore the tones and composition.
π: 0 β©: 0
300 sec with and IR and ND is still a lot of seconds...was it taken at night? (The IR wouldn't had worked if there is no sun though) Did you use a small aperture like f/22?
Just being curious. Great work anyway!!
π: 0 β©: 1
I've gotten 240+ seconds with just 3 stops of ND on the IR at f/16 in midday light. I think he can afford harder ND than I can 
π: 0 β©: 0
tak pokazaΔ to miejsce...szok i peΕen uznania!
π: 0 β©: 0
bloody hell thats good
nice to see sommit more original of SH as well
you use the 5d right ? and did you mod it at all to capture IR better ?
π: 0 β©: 0
Stonehenge rocks!!!
You shot is amazing!
Which aperture size did you used to this one?
π: 0 β©: 0
woah, i wish my ir filter worked :'[
stupid d80 having a good ir sensor :'[
π: 0 β©: 0
π: 0 β©: 0
ive seen a lot of photos of stone henge, and seen it many times in real life. and this is the best photo i have ever ever seen of it. It's magical and captures it in a totally original way.
well done on such an amazing shot.. im totally in awe.
π: 0 β©: 0
Bardzo, bardzo oryginalne. Zdaje siΔ, nie widziaΕam jeszcze Stonehenge w takiej kolorystyce.
π: 0 β©: 0
300sec exposure?
Awesome stuff.
π: 0 β©: 0
love the IR filter look here. really helps make it quite creepy.
π: 0 β©: 0
I love it, but I kinda wish it was in color.
π: 0 β©: 0
Compliments for the result, the long exposure made the sky simply fantastic and created a unique atmosphere.
π: 0 β©: 0
shit 300 seconds!
that must be a seriously high f-stop grad!
π: 0 β©: 0
Wow! I want to go there so bad, but I know my photography won't be a millionth as awesome as yours.
π: 0 β©: 0
wonderful!!! it reminds me constable's stonhenge, except there is no rainbow, but yet what a sky!!
i've always dreamt to go there.
π: 0 β©: 0
Wooooow! Very awesome. I love the ominious magical feel mixed with almost a creepy sense. I jus love this. Awesome work =^^=
π: 0 β©: 0
That is the most awesome shot i ever saw of stonehenge. I dont live too far away and i see it or pictures of it almost everyday and i never even expected to see a shot like this one. How in the world did you make it look like that?
Great work! 
π: 0 β©: 0
Ah yes, the mysterious Stonehenge
π: 0 β©: 0
the clouds are really cool!
π: 0 β©: 0
<= Prev | | Next =>