HOME | DD

YokoKinawa — Yoko's works 2016 version

#chibi #ppg #yoko #sumary #art #mlpmylittlepony #artsummary2016
Published: 2016-12-31 09:56:06 +0000 UTC; Views: 945; Favourites: 51; Downloads: 6
Redirect to original
Description Bien, la verdad es ke apenas y hubo un par de imágenes "bien hechas".... Este año hice bastantes en estilo puff.... y traté de hacer ke lucieran japoneses.... :'V ... no lo logré... en serio, cómo le harán?....
En fin... no hubo nada ke merezca mencionar... o resaltar....

Y no puedo evitar ke mis trabajos luzcan "pastelosos" :V jeje....
Related content
Comments: 11

GeoffNET [2016-12-31 20:59:01 +0000 UTC]

Your artwork is so soft, I just want to squeeze it all!

Best wishes for a happy new year!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

YokoKinawa In reply to GeoffNET [2017-01-02 01:01:52 +0000 UTC]

Jaja naaah XD... It's just the 'blurr effect' ;D ....

Thank you!... Best whishes for you too! ...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TheSuperSaiyan10 [2016-12-31 18:27:56 +0000 UTC]

I Love your artwork

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

PalletToons [2016-12-31 11:39:11 +0000 UTC]

Four is "IV", not "IIII"

(Amazing drawings ♡)

👍: 0 ⏩: 3

YokoKinawa In reply to PalletToons [2017-01-01 23:39:11 +0000 UTC]

Uhm.... I didn't notice that.... well, seems that person who did the template didn't know that...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

GeoffNET In reply to YokoKinawa [2017-01-02 00:17:43 +0000 UTC]

It's okay, Yoko—IIII looks better on a circle than IV does ^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

GeoffNET In reply to PalletToons [2016-12-31 20:49:01 +0000 UTC]

"IIII" is an option: mathtourist.blogspot.ca/2010/0…

(And yes, the artwork is amazing!)

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

X-cene2point0 In reply to PalletToons [2016-12-31 12:41:46 +0000 UTC]

amazing how often i see that mistake

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

GeoffNET In reply to X-cene2point0 [2016-12-31 20:57:23 +0000 UTC]

If you see it often, then you should ask yourself if it really is a mistake: mathtourist.blogspot.ca/2010/0…
Just because we've only seen one way to do something doesn't mean there aren't other ways to do it!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

X-cene2point0 In reply to GeoffNET [2017-01-01 11:57:49 +0000 UTC]

._. by that logic you can go IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII to infinity

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

GeoffNET In reply to X-cene2point0 [2017-01-01 17:28:31 +0000 UTC]

You certainly could, but then the number wouldn't be very easy to read And that, right there, is the point of a number system.

Four "I"s is small enough that, at a glance, you can instantly count them.  With five or more, the effort needed to count them begins to increase.  If you lived in Roman times and you were making a clock, you could justify your use of IIII for "four" much more easily than you could justify your use of IIIIIII for "seven".

You can also tell IIII and VI apart more easily than IV and VI, especially on a clock, where they may be upside down.

We may not be able to understand why some people still choose to write IIII, but just because they do doesn't mean they're "wrong".

👍: 0 ⏩: 0