HOME | DD

GaiaX2 In reply to lugia61617 [2012-05-26 04:18:02 +0000 UTC]

Personally, I'd perfer nanites over Eggman's method too. In the cartoon, it was a strange unexplained electrical lightshow that was triggered by a button sequence, how I viewed it the process was pretty painful for five minutes as you are disentigrated (hence being zapped in the origional cartoon) and reintegrated into machinery (genetic reconstruction), then wiped of emotion as a metal slave through a mental block that Chuck managed to fight off.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

lugia61617 In reply to GaiaX2 [2012-05-26 04:44:22 +0000 UTC]

I've never been a SatAM fan, so I usually think of roboticization being blocked from view. I've actually considered it being nanobots before, except they're confined to the roboticization chamber. That or we could just cry "cartoon physics".
But I do wish the good docroe would return to that tactic. Let's face it, it was a good one. I was so hyped about seeing Robodillos in Dark Brotherhood that I was depressed to hear it wasn't canon.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

GaiaX2 In reply to lugia61617 [2012-05-26 04:57:29 +0000 UTC]

I was also following the comics, where the process origionated. Way I saw it is that Eggman was more or less studying and found Chuck was doing the same thing then made a more agressive version of Chuck's origional design, and made CHUCK the test victim ironically enough.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

lugia61617 In reply to GaiaX2 [2012-05-26 07:15:25 +0000 UTC]

I always loved that bit. I never read the comics and only got into sonic from the games, but the wikis do help learn the beautiful history. Heheh. Good ol' Eggman, only he can turn the inventor into the victim. He does the same to Titan in Sonic Unerground with the fake de-roboticizer.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

GaiaX2 In reply to lugia61617 [2012-05-26 19:07:20 +0000 UTC]

I learned of sonic through the games myself, heh.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0