HOME | DD
ZeWqt — What the heck are you!
Published: 2013-10-16 17:22:57 +0000 UTC; Views: 9782; Favourites: 215; Downloads: 26
Redirect to original
Description
Un Deinonychus (ici c'est une femelle, c'est pour ça qu'elle n'a pas de tâches bleues) qui se demande qu'est-ce que ce truc peut être, un truc qui s'avère être lui aussi un Deinonychus, mais des années 80 et 90.A Deinonychus (here it's a female, it is for that she doesn't have the blue markings) who wonders what this thing can be, a thing that is also a Deinonychus, but in the 80's and the 90's.
Related content
Comments: 80
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
And then, a few days ago, scientists named Dakotaraptor. Which is basically the thing from Jurassic Park, but with unpronated hands, a birdlike IQ, and feathers.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Well, except for the size, there is no major ressemblance between Dakotaraptor and the JP outdated "Velociraptors".
Also, where in the description it's stated that this animal is a JP raptor? It indeed looks like a JP raptor, but it's based on a picture of a Deinonychus in a 90's book.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I'm just guessing it is. There's something called "The Dim Effect", where a fictional species is made up in a movie, only for a real species resembling it to later be discovered. It happened with the character Dim from "A Bug's Life" and with Scrat from "Ice Age".
The dromaeosaurs in Jurassic Park are too big to be Deinonychus (which are only 10 feet long and 3 feet tall), and don't have the proper anatomy of a Utahraptor. Add the fact that they seem to be accustomed to Tyrannosaurus, and it's possible that those "Velociraptor" actually have a lot of Dakotaraptor DNA in their genomes.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Except for the size, the JP raptors have almost nothing in common with Dakotaraptor, but yeah, it can be something like that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Actually, JP Raptor aren't Dakotaraptor.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Well, they're too small to be Utahraptor.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
They ae Achillobator.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
If they were, their snouts wouldn't be so tall in structure, and their arms would be shorter.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
you should make one of a new version of t rex meets a retro t rex
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Already done, but I can't take pictures for the moment, so I can't put it on DA.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Plus modern Igunodon meets retro Igunodon
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I already drew a picture about Iguanodon, but it is more like this one.
I can't upload it though.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I don't have a scanner, and my dog broke my camera.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Funny level : Too much real !
İt kinda like Juraasic Park OverGrown FrogRaptors
(Or Velociraptors if it makes it less accurate)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Now JP raptors are just herrerasaurs on steroids
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Yeah, but Utahraptors most likely had a coat of fuzz, while herrerasaurs probably was a scaly beast
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
You could have all outdated theropods being beaten the crap out of by modern ones.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Not only Theropods; Virtually every fossil species had different interpretations over the time!
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Modern animals even (cough"cyclops"cough)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
How about the fact they thought the beaver had a detachable penis LOL
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Funny! But the JP raptors weren't bigger than Deinonychus, and they certainly weren't as big as Utahraptor!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
The JP Raptors were not longer that Deinonychus, but they were taller. It would be longer if it had the proportions of Deinonychus...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
True, but not by that much. The real Deinonychus should be right under a man's shoulder, and the JP raptors are about at a man's ear. They are both roughly the same body size, maybe the JP raptors being a tad bit larger. The JP3 raptors are an exception though, there quite a bit bigger than the JP raptors at about 4 meters.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
They are still higher, end of the story...
By the way, where did you see that the innacurate one on my drawing is a JP Raptor?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Not by that much, nuff said here. But hell, I don't want to argue with you, I just wanted to note that. Why do I think it's a JP raptor?" um...........it's almost identical to a JP raptor, everything down to the slit pupils, coloration, pronated carpals, demeanor, etc. I mean really, since when has this animal been portrayed like this in the media? Other than Jurassic Park or Jurassic Park inspired cartoon, Deinonychus has never looked liked this I'm afraid. Some really outdated paleo art has portrayed it with a somewhat similar scaly appearance, but nothing like this.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
You might be surprised, but I based this Raptor on the picture of a Deinonychus in an old Dinosaur book that I have, I guess they were heavily inspired by the one of JP but it still not a JP Raptor. :3
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Could u do a what the heck are u T. rex which a modern day T. rex (not covered in feathers mind you) meets a old school tail dragging T. rex!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
It's on my list, but I will make others "What the heck are you" before. By the way, I will make it as I see it (if it's land in the domain of the accuracy, at least as we know), and as I see it, it has at least some feathers.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
a hey maybe you can a pyroraptor if you dont no what it is look iy uo on the internet please
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I don't see the interest of making a Pyroraptor in the "What the heck are you!" series since I already made a comparaison between two images of one Dromaeosauridae. And if you ask me to make a Pyroraptor, it won't be for the moment...
And by the way, the fact that you may think that I don't know what a Pyroraptor is sounds a bit like an insult for me! X)
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
The raptors were big in the JP movies cause Spielberg didnt think the actual velociraptors size was scary enough. So much for making the most accurate dino film of the time. Heh he also made the diliphilosaurus
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
The Raptors in the book are too big to be Velociraptor (based on Deinonychus, remember, who is bigger than Velociraptor) even if they are bigger than the actual Deinonychus, so actually, they were inaccurate even in 1993 X)
I know that the Dinos of this movies was the most accurate ones of their time but it is not the case today, and the thing that angers me is that most of people think the JP Dinos are still accurate.
Oh, by the way, its "Dilophosaurus", not "Diliphilosaurus", and an adult Dilophosaurus is far bigger than the JP Raptor.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Didnt I say the Dilophosaurus was 10 feet tall? Are you even reading what I write? You seem to be missing a lot of what I say as you rush in to make your own points. And my statement included that the film dinos were SUPPOSED to be the most accurate depicted but obviously were not given the significant changes made to the raptors and the Dilophosaurus. Both the book and the film took some liberal licenses with the creatures for the sake of entertainment which was my entire point which oddly you rehashed right back at me.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Uh, no, you didn't said anything about the "Diliphilosaurus"...
And you, have you even read my awnser? I said that I do know that the JP animals were the most accurate depictions BY THEIR TIME, even if they already had some inaccuraties, personally I have nothing about the creative licenses, I often use creative licenses (like the Llamma-Pelecanimimus that I've done in SPORE), I said that the thing that angers me it the fact that even NOWADAYS, people think these Dinos are accurate.
Also, don't make big and unclear sentences like this, since I am not good at the debates in English (I am at the level of checking what I wrote to see if there is mistakes) so try to do simple phrases si tu ne veux pas que je m'exprime en Français châtié avec toi ou que j'use d'un vocabulaire argotique pour que les traduc soient incapables de biter un broc ...
And for the humanity sake, use the metric system! XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Ummm, Im actually a....a.....a Utahraptor, yeah thats the ticket.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Well, actually, Crichton based its "Velociraptor" on Deinonychus, not on Utahraptor who wasn't even discovered when he wrote his novel Jurassic Park, and even if it was an Utahraptor, it is still too short, featherless, with ugly pronated forearms, big Allosaur-like head, without gastralia etc... So, no, it is not a Utahraptor at all my dear...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>