HOME | DD

Zilla-Tatsushin — Godzilla, King of the Monsters

Published: 2008-07-02 20:43:11 +0000 UTC; Views: 6677; Favourites: 57; Downloads: 37
Redirect to original
Description I've always wanted to make a Godzilla Yu-Gi-Oh! God card. I wanted to make it difficult to summon, but once it got out it was both fair (to a degree) but grossly overpowered. I think I've effectively accomplished that goal. Basically, Godzilla cannot attack if your opponent has no monster on the field. If you try to use anything against it (effects, traps, spells, attacks) you lose everything on your side of the field. If Godzilla attacks, you lose everything on your side of the field. You take bucoo damage for it too. BUT! its a 5 tribute summon, and cannot be special summoned. Thus, getting it to the field is painfully difficult. The image is a google find, and I use yugioh cardmaker ([link] ). Here are the official stats:

Name:
Godzilla, King of the Monsters

Attribute:
FIRE

Level:
12

Type:
Divine-Beast

Effect:
This card cannot be Special Summoned. This card cannot be Normal Summoned or Set except by Tributing 5 monsters. The ATK and DEF of this card are each 100 points higher than the highest ATK on the field. When a card your opponent controls declares this card as a target, destroy that card. When this monster destroys a card and sends it to the Graveyard, destroy all cards your opponent controls and inflict 1000 damage to your opponent for each card destroyed by this effect.

ATK:
????

DEF:
????

Enjoy.
Related content
Comments: 24

The-Omega-Metroid [2014-02-24 01:17:13 +0000 UTC]

Magic Dimension's effect that destroys a monster on the field doesn't target, nor does Mirror Force. ^_^

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TheKrystalKross [2013-05-13 22:07:16 +0000 UTC]

There is a flaw:

Mirror Force.

It does not target.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ProjectSINQ [2012-10-24 21:25:43 +0000 UTC]

Needs grammar but other then that, HOLY SH#T!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Zilla-Tatsushin In reply to ProjectSINQ [2013-02-23 20:45:37 +0000 UTC]

Where do you see grammatical errors? I'll correct them.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

jf9009 [2011-12-02 14:29:44 +0000 UTC]

cool

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

godzillarules [2010-11-25 03:30:52 +0000 UTC]

Cool!
Say, could you maybe take a look at my Godzilla Yugioh card and tell me what you think? [link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

GRgoldfish101 [2008-11-16 20:43:18 +0000 UTC]

that iss a good card it would be banned

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Zilla-Tatsushin In reply to GRgoldfish101 [2008-11-17 19:38:28 +0000 UTC]

Duh.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

GRgoldfish101 In reply to Zilla-Tatsushin [2008-11-17 23:50:39 +0000 UTC]

but i would still want it

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

D-Katarn [2008-07-08 16:33:39 +0000 UTC]

One easy card combo can beat it: any monster with at least half it's current attack and Metalmorph equipped to it. Same applies to The Wicked Avatar.

Even easier combo to use is Barrel Behind the Door or Energy Absorbing Monolith in response to the 1000 each effect, which would either let one gain all those points, without taking damage, or make you lose them.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Zilla-Tatsushin In reply to D-Katarn [2008-07-08 21:06:08 +0000 UTC]

Keep in mind, "When a card your opponent controls declares this card as a target, destroy that card." which includes Spells, Monsters, Traps, and other effects.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

D-Katarn In reply to Zilla-Tatsushin [2008-07-09 21:32:34 +0000 UTC]

The last two don't target the monster, but the damage. It'd work.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Zilla-Tatsushin In reply to D-Katarn [2008-07-10 02:48:10 +0000 UTC]

But that's not beating the card, it's beating the Player. There's a difference.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

D-Katarn In reply to Zilla-Tatsushin [2008-07-11 02:01:54 +0000 UTC]

But, hey, the monster dies with it's master.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Zilla-Tatsushin In reply to D-Katarn [2008-07-11 15:50:30 +0000 UTC]

Not nescassarily. The point is, the Card itself is invulernable. It itself cannot be defeated. The player, however is a different story.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

D-Katarn In reply to Zilla-Tatsushin [2008-07-12 05:13:44 +0000 UTC]

Actually, now that I think of it, cards like Raigeki and Dark Hole would work because cards that destroy all of a section or sections of the field don't count as targeting. This could be reversed if you changed the text to be along the lines of "any card that effects this card is destroyed."

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Zilla-Tatsushin In reply to D-Katarn [2008-07-12 08:42:49 +0000 UTC]

Look at the card's type. Divine-Beast in general are uneffected by effects of all kinds. Most of the effect I wrote was redundant, though it did go on to say "destroy" those cards rather than merely "immune". Though, I think I will make the suggested change. In the Navy, redundancy is a good thing... sort of...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

D-Katarn In reply to Zilla-Tatsushin [2008-07-13 02:56:50 +0000 UTC]

I hate when people misunderstand the divine attribute. Effects do work when either 1) one-time larger area effects, like whole field or all monsters on a side by field cards or ones like Chaos Emperor Dragon or Mirror Force, or 2) longer term effects, like Monster Reborn or Shadow Spell, although those last until one turn after activation and then are both negated and destroyed if not already in the graveyard.

There is also the heirarcy part that is not fully accepted by all players, but mainly only fits in with the god cards. It's my opinion that it's too powerful of a system anyway.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Zilla-Tatsushin In reply to D-Katarn [2008-07-13 05:05:39 +0000 UTC]

...

LOOK! A DISTRACTION!

*runs away*

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ixzidian2031 [2008-07-05 23:33:46 +0000 UTC]

THAT IS FREAKN FANTASTIC! THIS CARD HAS TO BE THE MOST UNBEATABLE CARD IN GAME.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Zilla-Tatsushin In reply to ixzidian2031 [2008-07-07 17:14:30 +0000 UTC]

That's the idea. I've always idolized and deified Godzilla. However, to be fair I required his summon cost to be nearly impossible.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ixzidian2031 In reply to Zilla-Tatsushin [2008-07-07 18:21:08 +0000 UTC]

really......man i gotta print that out & make it as card, but dont hav that ability to do that.......FREAKN AWSOME!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Zilla-Tatsushin In reply to ixzidian2031 [2008-07-07 20:02:56 +0000 UTC]

///_^ I do.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ixzidian2031 In reply to Zilla-Tatsushin [2008-07-08 05:06:16 +0000 UTC]

lucky >B )

👍: 0 ⏩: 0