HOME | DD

Published: 2004-09-11 19:18:22 +0000 UTC; Views: 10708; Favourites: 18; Downloads: 2185
Redirect to original
Description
added lots of cubes to simalate the effect some1 suggested that its just a part of sth biggerENJOYMENT=COMMENT
Edit:
brightened a little
Related content
Comments: 122
KeyEternal [2006-04-11 17:23:43 +0000 UTC]
Gah! Cool wall! Love how you did those cubes and those glass-like words.
They just looks real, when you can see it's reflecting that looks like a table with all those things on top of it.
Nice work and a clean job. "thumbs up"
Adding to my fav. ^_^
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
zipper In reply to KeyEternal [2006-04-11 18:16:11 +0000 UTC]
thanks too bad i didnt win that conest tho
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
KeyEternal In reply to zipper [2006-04-11 19:21:23 +0000 UTC]
Ah! No! But you did great!
*ahem* I hereby declares you winner!
*snatch the trophy and give it to Zipper*
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Androhazard [2004-10-26 22:29:57 +0000 UTC]
wow! this is like totally amazing! I'm definately putting it on my desktop! i just luuurve the glass effect!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
black-taurus [2004-09-30 06:52:51 +0000 UTC]
Hmmm... Wydaje mi sie, ze Koobox Deluxe przyjedzie do polski... A nawet jesli nie on, to wielce prawdopodobne, ze ktoras z nagrod powedruje do ciebie... Gratuluje...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
UnhingedMouse0 In reply to zipper [2004-09-21 19:27:03 +0000 UTC]
dat makes sense...i shoulda guessed that
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
SuggestedDosage [2004-09-19 00:27:43 +0000 UTC]
I believe the only person who doesn't have the ability to believe in a masterpiece is the person who made it.
Good job, I am astonished at how deep you went into the details, this must have taken forever. +Faved.
Kudos
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
zipper In reply to SuggestedDosage [2004-09-19 00:31:17 +0000 UTC]
lol not really i think the main thing took around 3hrs... but tweaking took looooong timer like always
thanks for comment man
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SuggestedDosage In reply to zipper [2004-09-19 00:37:48 +0000 UTC]
Your avatar is very interesting, too! I just noticed that it's moving glass! That's really cool.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
silverwizard [2004-09-19 00:25:17 +0000 UTC]
OK, crap! Can't keep my bloody mouth shut! Quite nice, actually. 👍: 0 ⏩: 1
zipper In reply to silverwizard [2004-09-19 00:32:28 +0000 UTC]
lol strange sense of humor indeed
thanks for comments
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
silverwizard In reply to zipper [2004-09-19 05:49:33 +0000 UTC]
Seriously though, I am most impressed. I haven't read any other comments 'cause I did not want any bias to creep in. What prog. did you use and can a really old idiot, like myself, learn to use it? Dead flat serious here, just like a flat tire in the middle of the Gobi Desert.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
zipper In reply to silverwizard [2004-09-19 08:12:43 +0000 UTC]
lol its made with 3d studio max. if u know what to do learning it isnt dso hard really...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
silverwizard In reply to zipper [2004-09-19 21:23:41 +0000 UTC]
Hmmm, might have to pick that up and play with it. Might be the answer for a couple of ideas I've had floating about.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
silverwizard In reply to zipper [2004-09-19 05:45:14 +0000 UTC]
My mother always told me that I was strange. Actually, she had no idea.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
zipper In reply to BrentonJ [2004-09-16 23:13:03 +0000 UTC]
yeah ive heard thanks for the info
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
cyberphobia [2004-09-16 17:19:46 +0000 UTC]
.. that's a cool model, just I think it needs being smoother - better anti-alias.. why not re-render it?.. and the "ground" is merely much neutral - I'd make it brighter on darker - doesn't matter, but not neutral.. to make more contrast. the refle/refra.ctions are cool enough ..mental ray?? [well.. and writing this made me another thought - could look interesting if the material was bit fluent.. like more waterish, not a glass..]
ok, those are my bits, anyway, it's a kickass work! ..and your avatar is best I've seen ever.. yea.. nearly like that
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
zipper In reply to cyberphobia [2004-09-16 23:17:06 +0000 UTC]
its final render ill work on ur suggestions
thanks
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
zipper In reply to cyberphobia [2004-09-17 10:44:38 +0000 UTC]
for nothing? what do u mean by that?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
cyberphobia In reply to zipper [2004-09-17 10:50:36 +0000 UTC]
I meant that you're welcome, I dunno - in my home language we say "for nothing", so I wrote it.. sorry if it's not used
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
zipper In reply to cyberphobia [2004-09-17 12:09:04 +0000 UTC]
lol what is ur home language then?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
zipper In reply to cyberphobia [2004-09-17 12:19:53 +0000 UTC]
ah :] im from poland quite close to u
greets
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
cyberphobia In reply to zipper [2004-09-17 12:22:40 +0000 UTC]
wow.. so - here's a "HI" from a neighbor
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
tarasque [2004-09-16 16:47:12 +0000 UTC]
I saw this the day you submitted it -- actually in the "most recent deviations" section -- and I knew from that moment that you were probably preordained to win
You're definitely going to land one of the prizes, if not first place. This is a lovely render, and though I think that although the original version looked a little nicer (the smallest cubes make it look a bit cluttered, IMO) you definitely deserve the recognition you're getting for this. Best of luck in the contest (though with a piece this good, I don't think you'll need luck )
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
zipper In reply to tarasque [2004-09-16 23:14:20 +0000 UTC]
lol luck is always needed thanks for the comment
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
xsos [2004-09-16 10:21:30 +0000 UTC]
awesome , i think u will win the contest too
and i will be a loser
Great Job
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
zipper In reply to xsos [2004-09-16 10:44:34 +0000 UTC]
well see about that theres lots of awesome entries
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
mikestonge [2004-09-16 05:43:03 +0000 UTC]
I liked it with fewer blocks, I think they are too distracting now
but they are still cool looking
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
RideStowe [2004-09-16 03:13:19 +0000 UTC]
if you dont mind my asking, how long do these renders take??? the caustics alone seem like hours of fun(haha) and you've done so many...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
zipper In reply to RideStowe [2004-09-16 08:28:03 +0000 UTC]
hmm caustics r generated with about 700'000'000 rays and take about 2 hrs to count + 3-4 hours rendering the final image
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
RideStowe In reply to zipper [2004-09-20 01:48:00 +0000 UTC]
wow thats really not that bad, i thought'd be a lot more.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
digimonsterz [2004-09-15 23:43:13 +0000 UTC]
wow, this is amazing. Why dont u animate it for fun?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
zipper In reply to digimonsterz [2004-09-16 00:06:34 +0000 UTC]
lol maybe because every frame would render for 4 hours?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>