HOME | DD
zohyXD β ISRAELI CIVILIANS ARE HAMAS' TARGETS
Published: 2012-11-16 11:42:26 +0000 UTC; Views: 239; Favourites: 8; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
''Red'' is no longer a color.Hamas' terrorist actions take place from under hospitals, schools and kindergartens in Gaza. All means are justified as long as Jews are killed.
please watch this movie and share!
:[link] :
Related content
Comments: 11
problem is that it is also the other way around.
both sides are killing innocent civilians.
π: 0 β©: 1
The IDF doing the best not to harm innocent people- something that you cant say about Hamas, And that's a huge diffrence.
Would you sit quiet for 7 years of rockets on Netherlands? probably not...
thank you for reading
π: 0 β©: 2
no problem, I just think its more complicated then one is doing good things and one bad.
i am not saying hamas is better just that there are two sides of this story.
I see innocent people dieing on both sides and there reasons are both valid,
although the yewish people owned the land in a far away past and then some other people took over (still in a far past).
would this mean that one of the two groups really owns the land? is the owner the one that controlled it first or longest or last
or maybe none of them really owns the land? if you believe in god isnt all land possesed by god? doesnt that mean that noone actually has the right to take it and so the right to keep it for themselfs. doesnt that mean all the people currently in isreal have to share the land? one way or another?
but i guess its complicated
well thanks for reading my comment too
π: 0 β©: 2
yeah,it is complicated. I dont say i have a solution or that the jewish own the land. But seen the world keep blaming israel for everything is really no fair.
thanks again
π: 0 β©: 0
+1 AHappyFace.
It is true that the earth is a holy land for three books everyone should coexist.
As far as I know it was Palestine was under Ottoman and british mandate that we delivered part of the Zionist (in places to give independence to the Palestinians) and after they conquirie the rest by force
Ce qui a Γ©tait prit par la force.
(immigration policy, apartheid, ... Is there any good side in this state?)
this is not an incitement to hain but what was took by force will not be able to be rendered ββonly by force.
good evening everyone.
π: 0 β©: 0
Just compare the super-sophisticated weapons on one side and plain on the other rocket. And watch as the number of victims before speaking
(everyone knows they are chicken-hearted :$)
π: 0 β©: 1
what do -you- know about israelis victims? just because we don't run around with crops all over the place, doesn't mean that they don't exsist. And of course no one mentions this.
The fact that they have unsophisticated weapons dosen't make them innocent.
Israel have the right to protect itself, and that's the only thing it's trying to do.
thank you for reading\watching
π: 0 β©: 1
both please dont start trowing chairs at each other.
as far as my guess is none of use is there standing in the middle of corpses to see what group is killing most civilians.
you'll see that most americans are pro israel in this matter and most europeans pro hamas.
this is just for one reason and that is not a completly different understanding of whats wrong and right but a situation created by the media wo only show us one point of view.
the matter in my eye's:
the elder brother sits in a chair and after a while he gets up and walks to the kitchen to get himself a drink, then his younger brother shows up and takes the warm and fuzzy chair. In his eye's no one was actually sitting on it. then his older brother returns and demands thats he gets his chair back, when his brother doesnt answer that call he "gently"(not trying to actually hurt him) takes him and puts him on the couch next to it. the younger brother get angry becuase his brother stole his chair and starts punching him. the older brother wo's not actually badly hurt by his younger brother pushes him which makes him even more angry.
both are brothers since because are human. both think the chair belongs to them while actually both of there religions say it is the father wo owns the chair since he bought it. still the father allows them to sit on it,but only one is able to sit at the time. so wo gets the chair?
π: 0 β©: 0