HOME | DD

Published: 2009-06-02 10:24:14 +0000 UTC; Views: 3128; Favourites: 57; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
Model: Chanthel RaquelLocation: Cocoa Beach, FL
Nikon D80
More of her:
Related content
Comments: 20
Wigi03 [2017-11-15 04:41:30 +0000 UTC]
“And here, we have a....woah:....GOD DANG WHO’S THAT SHE’S SEXY!”
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Doom-Fox [2009-06-06 04:18:29 +0000 UTC]
Once again a great picture dude, the model is beautiful and great
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
zoomzoom In reply to Leetmonkey [2009-06-03 03:57:22 +0000 UTC]
lol... I do 3D at work... getting a little burned doing it at home as well.
But I am still animating here and there. just not as much.
I am currently working on two animations that I will try to lunch in June.
Thanks.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Leetmonkey In reply to zoomzoom [2009-06-04 01:41:14 +0000 UTC]
Hah, your welcome.
I just would like to see a little more 3Dness.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
VaKonS [2009-06-02 19:12:57 +0000 UTC]
Her hair looks wonderful!
Да, а вот волосы шикарно смотрятся при таком освещении!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
VaKonS [2009-06-02 19:10:14 +0000 UTC]
Да дело не в пальме из головы...
Воздуху маловато - она просто зажата получилась в рамках кадра... И дерево на переднем плане из-за этого вышло настолько преобладающим, что отвлекает внимание от модели... Ну это на мой взгляд
И знаешь, может быть, ещё освещение - она бы эффектней смотрелась, если бы солнце попадало на неё немного спереди и подчёркивало фигуру...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
zoomzoom In reply to VaKonS [2009-06-02 19:16:22 +0000 UTC]
horoshaia chritika... spasibo.. ti ne somneno prav na schot solnsa.. a s derevom mi povoiuem...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
VaKonS In reply to zoomzoom [2009-06-02 19:49:41 +0000 UTC]
Только тогда добавь в описании "во время съёмок деревьев не пострадало"
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
zoomzoom In reply to xAgNO3x [2009-06-02 16:10:32 +0000 UTC]
i don't know... i kind of feel that i missed out with this one. not sure what is wrong here. but something is.. i am just not happy with this shot. what do you think?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
xAgNO3x In reply to zoomzoom [2009-06-05 01:52:37 +0000 UTC]
Well... you probably got her too easy. I think the shot is nice. I don't know what are you looking with these shots, beyond portraying sexy girls, but they're very, very nice for your level of experience. Her face is a bit out of focus but anyway, not a big problem. I think the main thing is you probably wanted something more curved. I think you must buy a better lense for that camera, you will love a depth of field of 1.4; 1.8 and 2.8. For the other hand, thinking more on the background will help you to get a more interesting pic thus the house color is pretty appealing and contrasting, the object itself it's not. Lights are very nice. There is a very annoying yellowish/greenish color in her belly, next to the palm that you should remove too.
About my comment, I think we will se some nudes pretty soon
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
zoomzoom In reply to xAgNO3x [2009-06-05 15:41:34 +0000 UTC]
yea.. i am getting 1.8 50mm this weekend... looking forward to shooting with that. the front palm. i like to keep. the background, i may cut
yea.. i aim to do some nudes this summer.. i think.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
xAgNO3x In reply to zoomzoom [2009-06-06 03:43:34 +0000 UTC]
Very cool man, very cool! For both things, the lens and the nudes!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
zoomzoom In reply to hulkdaddyg [2009-06-02 16:11:49 +0000 UTC]
she is. was nice to work with as well..
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
zoomzoom In reply to Necroantics [2009-06-02 18:20:00 +0000 UTC]
oh! i just got what you were trying to say.. at first i was like, what the hell... but now i see it... good point, but i didn't even notice before... now i am thinking of taking it out
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Necroantics In reply to zoomzoom [2009-06-03 08:56:19 +0000 UTC]
hahaha, yeah.
Well, if you take it out, and find out that youre still not happy with it, talk to me, maybe we can find out why you arent exactly happy with it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0