HOME | DD

Published: 2011-12-01 17:26:19 +0000 UTC; Views: 7961; Favourites: 190; Downloads: 240
Redirect to original
Description
Not done yetYou can check the progress here [link] [link]
Related content
Comments: 71
4-X-S In reply to ??? [2014-09-20 15:01:05 +0000 UTC]
good stay tuned for more good looking ships
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
4-X-S In reply to Poila-Invictiwerks [2011-12-19 05:29:16 +0000 UTC]
Still it could be better
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
4-X-S In reply to Suki2025 [2011-12-06 16:23:59 +0000 UTC]
I guess you can never have too much awesomeness -O-
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
4-X-S In reply to Yumaboy1814 [2011-12-06 16:27:58 +0000 UTC]
Thanks, I wish I can finish rendering asap.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
VincentFaust9 [2011-12-05 22:20:20 +0000 UTC]
Beautiful! :3 Looks like a mix between Typhoon and Fenrir
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Moriskov In reply to 4-X-S [2011-12-04 07:26:16 +0000 UTC]
Most definitively. They are very sexy planes, although I like the MiG-23 Flogger as well. They look so damn mean. XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
4-X-S In reply to Moriskov [2011-12-04 21:12:33 +0000 UTC]
Flogger looks like the Russian's Tomcat.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Moriskov In reply to 4-X-S [2011-12-05 08:00:22 +0000 UTC]
Aye. But I love it all the same. I plan on using the basic design and giving it a intake under the body of the craft instead of on the side, like a F16.... when I get the skills of course. I already have a basic drawing done, although it looks like a space shuttle >.>
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
4-X-S In reply to Moriskov [2011-12-05 16:54:02 +0000 UTC]
It seems we have't fully embraced the variable geometry design, they are't using it on any new planes like the F22 or T50. May be due to its maintenance problem and lower weapon capacity.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
4-X-S In reply to CJManson [2011-12-04 03:16:53 +0000 UTC]
I had a name but kind stupid, so I decide to go without name.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Tentor32 In reply to 4-X-S [2011-12-05 20:24:54 +0000 UTC]
You should call it the Great White. Tigershark is already taken and Barracuda is probably taken as well but I am not sure.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
4-X-S In reply to Tentor32 [2011-12-06 16:32:44 +0000 UTC]
Thanks for the naming advise, Ill think about that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Tentor32 In reply to 4-X-S [2011-12-07 23:04:55 +0000 UTC]
I named one of my fighter aircraft that I designed that, but it looks kinda like a mig-31 foxhound or something like that. Isn't as cool as you think it is
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
4-X-S In reply to El-Bronco [2011-12-04 02:01:03 +0000 UTC]
oh thanks you gonna like it mora onec finished.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Torben88 [2011-12-03 06:47:53 +0000 UTC]
I'm an aerospace engineering student, and this looks like it could come off the page and fly. Damn. That is good!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
4-X-S In reply to Torben88 [2011-12-04 02:00:42 +0000 UTC]
That is because I used existing design pattern, fly or not, this does not violate common seance.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
4-X-S In reply to Colourbrand [2011-12-02 20:07:31 +0000 UTC]
Thanks, quality in drawing and not so in areo physics
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
4-X-S In reply to Colourbrand [2011-12-04 03:28:23 +0000 UTC]
minor update care to check out?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Colourbrand In reply to 4-X-S [2011-12-04 10:17:08 +0000 UTC]
I have and quality!!! Excellent work sir!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
moon-child-reo [2011-12-02 07:10:22 +0000 UTC]
Freakin' nice. It does look Flankery. Which is a good thing seeing as the "Crane" is one of my favorites.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
4-X-S In reply to moon-child-reo [2011-12-02 20:09:16 +0000 UTC]
flanker is just too awesome to ignore. I will make an epic flanker in near future, when my skill got better than now.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Broadshore In reply to 4-X-S [2011-12-02 03:48:16 +0000 UTC]
Wicked is good. As in bad ass. Great job on your fighter.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
4-X-S In reply to Broadshore [2011-12-02 20:10:45 +0000 UTC]
cuz you can't have perfection without insanity.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
4-X-S In reply to Broadshore [2011-12-04 03:17:48 +0000 UTC]
minor update, care to check out?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Broadshore In reply to 4-X-S [2011-12-04 06:04:39 +0000 UTC]
*whistles lowly.* Looking good man.. Looking good.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
4-X-S In reply to LOLMANIC45 [2011-12-02 01:49:37 +0000 UTC]
MiG 1.44 looks like shit, I was indented to rip off flanker.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
LOLMANIC45 In reply to 4-X-S [2011-12-02 01:54:44 +0000 UTC]
I wouldn't say that, mostly because it did not get famous, until it was too late and Sukhoi took the deal. Well, the A-10A looks like fucgly but it is still legendary
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
4-X-S In reply to LOLMANIC45 [2011-12-02 04:42:48 +0000 UTC]
I was joking by comparing 1.44 to flanker, it wasn't that bad, also A10 is not that ugly for its role.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
LOLMANIC45 In reply to 4-X-S [2011-12-02 16:49:08 +0000 UTC]
Well the Su-25TM is its Russian brother of the A-10A.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>