HOME | DD

4-X-S — WIP20111130B

Published: 2011-12-01 17:26:19 +0000 UTC; Views: 7961; Favourites: 190; Downloads: 240
Redirect to original
Description Not done yet Missile will be installed in the final version.

You can check the progress here [link] [link]
Related content
Comments: 71

4-X-S In reply to ??? [2014-09-20 15:01:05 +0000 UTC]

good stay tuned for more good looking ships

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Poila-Invictiwerks [2011-12-18 06:30:52 +0000 UTC]

Definitely an achievement in work

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

4-X-S In reply to Poila-Invictiwerks [2011-12-19 05:29:16 +0000 UTC]

Still it could be better

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

HELLGATEMARINE [2011-12-08 02:26:52 +0000 UTC]

Hell of a work

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

4-X-S In reply to HELLGATEMARINE [2011-12-09 02:20:33 +0000 UTC]

Also hell of learning.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HELLGATEMARINE In reply to 4-X-S [2011-12-09 12:51:52 +0000 UTC]

bet it is

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Suki2025 [2011-12-06 13:15:51 +0000 UTC]

to awesome O-O

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

4-X-S In reply to Suki2025 [2011-12-06 16:23:59 +0000 UTC]

I guess you can never have too much awesomeness -O-

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Yumaboy1814 [2011-12-06 06:28:24 +0000 UTC]

This is superb.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

4-X-S In reply to Yumaboy1814 [2011-12-06 16:27:58 +0000 UTC]

Thanks, I wish I can finish rendering asap.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

VincentFaust9 [2011-12-05 22:20:20 +0000 UTC]

Beautiful! :3 Looks like a mix between Typhoon and Fenrir

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

4-X-S In reply to VincentFaust9 [2011-12-06 16:29:06 +0000 UTC]

Or J20 and Flanker.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Moriskov [2011-12-04 06:02:26 +0000 UTC]

She's beautiful.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

4-X-S In reply to Moriskov [2011-12-04 07:09:06 +0000 UTC]

Thanks Russia for flanker.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Moriskov In reply to 4-X-S [2011-12-04 07:26:16 +0000 UTC]

Most definitively. They are very sexy planes, although I like the MiG-23 Flogger as well. They look so damn mean. XD

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

4-X-S In reply to Moriskov [2011-12-04 21:12:33 +0000 UTC]

Flogger looks like the Russian's Tomcat.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Moriskov In reply to 4-X-S [2011-12-05 08:00:22 +0000 UTC]

Aye. But I love it all the same. I plan on using the basic design and giving it a intake under the body of the craft instead of on the side, like a F16.... when I get the skills of course. I already have a basic drawing done, although it looks like a space shuttle >.>

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

4-X-S In reply to Moriskov [2011-12-05 16:54:02 +0000 UTC]

It seems we have't fully embraced the variable geometry design, they are't using it on any new planes like the F22 or T50. May be due to its maintenance problem and lower weapon capacity.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

CJManson [2011-12-04 02:03:59 +0000 UTC]

Nice. Do you have a name for it?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

4-X-S In reply to CJManson [2011-12-04 03:16:53 +0000 UTC]

I had a name but kind stupid, so I decide to go without name.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Tentor32 In reply to 4-X-S [2011-12-05 20:24:54 +0000 UTC]

You should call it the Great White. Tigershark is already taken and Barracuda is probably taken as well but I am not sure.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

4-X-S In reply to Tentor32 [2011-12-06 16:32:44 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for the naming advise, Ill think about that.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Tentor32 In reply to 4-X-S [2011-12-07 23:04:55 +0000 UTC]

I named one of my fighter aircraft that I designed that, but it looks kinda like a mig-31 foxhound or something like that. Isn't as cool as you think it is

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

El-Bronco [2011-12-03 15:56:26 +0000 UTC]

I like it

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

4-X-S In reply to El-Bronco [2011-12-04 02:01:03 +0000 UTC]

oh thanks you gonna like it mora onec finished.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Torben88 [2011-12-03 06:47:53 +0000 UTC]

I'm an aerospace engineering student, and this looks like it could come off the page and fly. Damn. That is good!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

4-X-S In reply to Torben88 [2011-12-04 02:00:42 +0000 UTC]

That is because I used existing design pattern, fly or not, this does not violate common seance.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Colourbrand [2011-12-02 13:56:10 +0000 UTC]

That is a QUALITY aircraft!!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

4-X-S In reply to Colourbrand [2011-12-02 20:07:31 +0000 UTC]

Thanks, quality in drawing and not so in areo physics

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Colourbrand In reply to 4-X-S [2011-12-03 09:16:02 +0000 UTC]

Either way - excellent!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

4-X-S In reply to Colourbrand [2011-12-04 03:28:23 +0000 UTC]

minor update care to check out?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Colourbrand In reply to 4-X-S [2011-12-04 10:17:08 +0000 UTC]

I have and quality!!! Excellent work sir!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

moon-child-reo [2011-12-02 07:10:22 +0000 UTC]

Freakin' nice. It does look Flankery. Which is a good thing seeing as the "Crane" is one of my favorites.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

4-X-S In reply to moon-child-reo [2011-12-02 20:09:16 +0000 UTC]

flanker is just too awesome to ignore. I will make an epic flanker in near future, when my skill got better than now.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

KevKoe [2011-12-02 02:31:46 +0000 UTC]

Coolness!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

4-X-S In reply to KevKoe [2011-12-02 20:09:36 +0000 UTC]

One word

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Broadshore [2011-12-02 01:13:39 +0000 UTC]

That wicked.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

4-X-S In reply to Broadshore [2011-12-02 01:49:53 +0000 UTC]

wicked can be good or bad.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Broadshore In reply to 4-X-S [2011-12-02 03:48:16 +0000 UTC]

Wicked is good. As in bad ass. Great job on your fighter.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

4-X-S In reply to Broadshore [2011-12-02 04:22:52 +0000 UTC]

like "sick" means awesome.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Broadshore In reply to 4-X-S [2011-12-02 06:32:11 +0000 UTC]

Awesome. *nods*

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

4-X-S In reply to Broadshore [2011-12-02 20:10:45 +0000 UTC]

cuz you can't have perfection without insanity.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Broadshore In reply to 4-X-S [2011-12-02 22:00:12 +0000 UTC]

Amen to that.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

4-X-S In reply to Broadshore [2011-12-04 03:17:48 +0000 UTC]

minor update, care to check out?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Broadshore In reply to 4-X-S [2011-12-04 06:04:39 +0000 UTC]

*whistles lowly.* Looking good man.. Looking good.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

LOLMANIC45 [2011-12-02 00:07:55 +0000 UTC]

It looks simlar to the MiG 1.44 Flatpack.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

4-X-S In reply to LOLMANIC45 [2011-12-02 01:49:37 +0000 UTC]

MiG 1.44 looks like shit, I was indented to rip off flanker.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

LOLMANIC45 In reply to 4-X-S [2011-12-02 01:54:44 +0000 UTC]

I wouldn't say that, mostly because it did not get famous, until it was too late and Sukhoi took the deal. Well, the A-10A looks like fucgly but it is still legendary

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

4-X-S In reply to LOLMANIC45 [2011-12-02 04:42:48 +0000 UTC]

I was joking by comparing 1.44 to flanker, it wasn't that bad, also A10 is not that ugly for its role.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

LOLMANIC45 In reply to 4-X-S [2011-12-02 16:49:08 +0000 UTC]

Well the Su-25TM is its Russian brother of the A-10A.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>