HOME | DD
AdanskaBelow — A quick comparison
Published: 2007-03-01 01:02:38 +0000 UTC; Views: 297; Favourites: 3; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
I went to see Hannibal Rising today with San. For about a week she's been gushing about how 'hot' Hannibal was. Alright, there were maybe three scenes where he was maybe a little bit 'cute', never hot. 90% of the movie he looked like that. Creepy as all fucking hell. When I told her he looked like the Thin Man, she had no clue what I was talking about. So I made a quick little comparison. For the record, Glover is a helluva lot creepier in Charlie's Angels as the Thin Man, but I can't really find any stills and I'm too lazy to look hard.Related content
Comments: 7
The left one is terrible you're right! But willard is cute!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Um.. They are sexy. I really hate it when people disrespect my boy Glover.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
MMmmmm they're both Yummy.
It's the fact that they're creppy and weird and extremely fucked up in the head that make them that way <33
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Well SURE with the slicked back hair he's creepy. But nobody likes slicked back hair. You need the good and tousled look. Yeeah.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
I love Slicked back hair,side hair,anything dapper.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
He's still fucking creepy, or as I said 'cute'. Not hot. Not, 'Wow I am attracted to that!'. Mildly cute at best, and mainly looking like a bad rip off of a young Robert Sean Leonard.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0