HOME | DD

AfroOtaku917 β€” Virgin Emoji vs Chad Spidey

#funny #mashup #parody #theemojimovie #crossover #oscars #sonypictures #spidermanmarvel #milesmorales #miles_morales #sonypicturesanimation #sonypicturesentertainment #milesmoralesspiderman #sony_pictures #milesmoralesmarvel #genetheemoji #chadvirgin #spidermanintothespiderverse #sony_pictures_animation #chadvirginmeme #milesmoralesfanart #milesmoralesintothespiderverse #milesmoralesmarvelcomics #spiderman_into_the_spider_verse #spidermanintospiderverse #spiderman_intothespiderverse #spidermanintothespiderversefanart #oscars2019
Published: 2019-02-25 09:08:56 +0000 UTC; Views: 23019; Favourites: 399; Downloads: 17
Redirect to original
Description Whatever you think of the Academy Awards these days, (And award shows in general) I think we can all agree that Spider-Man: Into the Spider-verse EARNED that Oscar, making it the first non Disney/Pixar film to win Best Animated Feature since Rango back in 2011.....and this was from the SAME studio that gave us The Emoji Movie last year. Talk about a redemption story. XD

But yeah, I promised myself that if Spider-verse manage to win, I would draw this in both celebration, and to make the perfect meme to describe both Sony films. Enjoy!

The Emoji Movie and Into the Spider-verse (c) Sony Pictures Animation

Spider-Man (c) Marvel
Related content
Comments: 72

MarvelThomas1987 [2023-02-16 00:10:41 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 0

godzillavkk [2021-10-01 12:59:46 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Platinum6868 [2021-09-24 04:54:29 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

zuckerbotwashere [2020-10-21 06:28:35 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 2 ⏩: 5

GUIDEFUL In reply to zuckerbotwashere [2023-06-09 03:07:55 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 0

probium In reply to zuckerbotwashere [2022-10-06 12:32:42 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 0

Shamerock2004 In reply to zuckerbotwashere [2022-01-15 16:15:04 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

zuckerbotwashere In reply to Shamerock2004 [2022-01-15 19:35:46 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 3

reerererertytyty In reply to zuckerbotwashere [2022-10-24 18:22:59 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

reerererertytyty In reply to reerererertytyty [2022-10-24 18:24:12 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

reerererertytyty In reply to reerererertytyty [2022-10-24 18:26:10 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

reerererertytyty In reply to reerererertytyty [2022-10-24 18:28:24 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

reerererertytyty In reply to reerererertytyty [2022-10-24 18:39:59 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

zuckerbotwashere In reply to reerererertytyty [2022-10-25 03:08:07 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

reerererertytyty In reply to zuckerbotwashere [2022-10-25 16:17:38 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Shamerock2004 In reply to zuckerbotwashere [2022-01-16 01:05:32 +0000 UTC]

Hidden by Commenter

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

zuckerbotwashere In reply to Shamerock2004 [2022-01-16 04:06:46 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Shamerock2004 In reply to zuckerbotwashere [2022-01-16 01:03:28 +0000 UTC]

Hidden by Commenter

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Shamerock2004 In reply to Shamerock2004 [2022-01-16 01:03:42 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

chompi12 In reply to zuckerbotwashere [2021-09-23 14:52:49 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 1

zuckerbotwashere In reply to chompi12 [2021-09-24 04:47:11 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

xXMaxwellthebadassXx In reply to zuckerbotwashere [2021-05-16 03:00:36 +0000 UTC]

Sorry not interested

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

zuckerbotwashere In reply to xXMaxwellthebadassXx [2021-05-16 23:44:37 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

VeryAnnoyngDude In reply to zuckerbotwashere [2021-10-10 08:09:57 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

zuckerbotwashere In reply to VeryAnnoyngDude [2021-10-12 02:56:32 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

VeryAnnoyngDude In reply to zuckerbotwashere [2021-10-13 02:10:24 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

zuckerbotwashere In reply to VeryAnnoyngDude [2021-10-13 17:10:33 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

M10085 In reply to zuckerbotwashere [2022-06-12 19:33:37 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

xXMaxwellthebadassXx In reply to zuckerbotwashere [2021-05-16 23:45:06 +0000 UTC]

Oh heeelllll no

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

zuckerbotwashere In reply to xXMaxwellthebadassXx [2021-05-16 23:46:12 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Maxwellschwas In reply to zuckerbotwashere [2021-08-07 22:47:18 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

zuckerbotwashere In reply to Maxwellschwas [2021-10-13 17:13:35 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

M10085 In reply to zuckerbotwashere [2022-06-12 19:33:56 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

zuckerbotwashere In reply to M10085 [2022-06-12 22:37:53 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

M10085 In reply to zuckerbotwashere [2022-06-12 23:48:42 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

XxPaytonSkull24xX [2020-08-14 02:19:57 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 0

D-Class-Kitty0706 [2020-05-03 13:01:04 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Detective88 [2020-04-21 00:53:46 +0000 UTC]

Spiderverse was awesome, though while I can like Miles, part of me felt he was flat

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

FrogwoodProductions [2020-04-17 12:26:06 +0000 UTC]

Not to mention they cancelled Genndy Tartakovsky's Popeye movie in favor of the Emoji Movie...

πŸ‘: 9 ⏩: 0

BartRulez666 [2019-11-12 20:17:15 +0000 UTC]

smiler had braces! shhe deserved it

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

sulPSulk [2019-11-11 06:17:42 +0000 UTC]

Terrible, such a terrible meme.

10/10

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

HugeTFPFan [2019-10-13 19:03:54 +0000 UTC]

When you curse the world with The Emoji Movie, but then you bless it with Spider-Verse.Β 

Sony Pictures Animation: Perfectly balanced, as all things should be.Β 

πŸ‘: 2 ⏩: 0

EmmetEarwax [2019-09-05 21:08:53 +0000 UTC]

WHY was Patrick Stewart, a man I admire & respect, cast as crap ?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Popzikles [2019-08-01 12:06:22 +0000 UTC]

Beautiful, absolutely beautiful! One of the best Virgin VS Chad memes I have ever saw!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

thearist2013 [2019-07-29 03:07:18 +0000 UTC]

why do I get the feeling that Sony Pictures Animation is trying to break new grounds in animation in terms of the bothΒ great and terrible

I understand that the production to Emoji Movie was a different story because of some guy had this idea which bombed, but considering how you have Sony having this peatier of The Emoji Movie then Spider-Verse, because that is just groundbreakingΒ 

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 0

Picklester [2019-05-30 19:17:40 +0000 UTC]

Gonna send this to KYM while sourcing credit back to you.Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Nickquoland [2019-04-13 23:31:12 +0000 UTC]

Ps. You forgot that the "villain" in the Emoji Movie was a cheap forced King Candy/Turbo-wannabe, but less cynical for the protagonists and the story's world than him.
Ralph Breaks the Internet was better than that movie (well, except Spiderman into the Spiderverse...Even with many references and easter eggs, I loved it...R.I.P. Stan Lee ;~

πŸ‘: 3 ⏩: 0

MakutaChroniclesXII [2019-03-29 20:35:12 +0000 UTC]

I saw some irony in the description considering that the Emoji Movie was trash, Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse was apparently excellent (My fucking parents wouldn't let me just because of it being animated), and they're made by the same studio, so that is complete irony..... XD

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 0

RZGmon200 [2019-03-22 18:42:38 +0000 UTC]

What problem theres in a dancy party ending?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

star3catcher In reply to RZGmon200 [2019-05-04 17:03:38 +0000 UTC]

Shrek was the first to use it, and in the context of that movie, it was a fun surprise that fit in with the rest of the movie's references to modernity and made sense because it was being held at a wedding. When Shrek became popular though, other movies started to copy it, but without the context or build-up. Now it's just a lazy way to end the story without having to write an actual ending and a cheap attempt to get the audience hyped to buy whatever radio single you attached to the movie on iTunes.

πŸ‘: 3 ⏩: 0


| Next =>