HOME | DD

aGentlemanScientist — Direct Evidences of Integument in Tyrannosaurs

#dinosaurs #feathers #paleontology #scales #skin #tyrannosaur #tyrannosaurid #tyrannosauroid #tyrannosaurus #tyrannosauroidea #trexdinosaur
Published: 2016-03-15 04:35:35 +0000 UTC; Views: 6340; Favourites: 116; Downloads: 31
Redirect to original
Description Numerous direct evidences of the skin coverings of various tyrannosaurs.
A chart used in my most recent video concerning tyrannosaur integument: www.youtube.com/watch?v=uM5JN_…

Silhouettes created by Paleop  , colored by me.

All sources can be found here:
z13.invisionfree.com/Hell_Cree…
Related content
Comments: 67

HUBLERDON In reply to ??? [2016-03-18 23:08:24 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TheDubstepAddict In reply to ??? [2016-03-15 20:10:15 +0000 UTC]

I think bare tail.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HUBLERDON In reply to TheDubstepAddict [2016-03-15 23:59:17 +0000 UTC]

Thanks.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TheDubstepAddict In reply to HUBLERDON [2016-03-16 06:01:48 +0000 UTC]

^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

randomdinos In reply to ??? [2016-03-15 17:25:17 +0000 UTC]

I'm not Trey (well duh lol) but at least the underside of the tail was most likely scaly or bare. Not sure about the calves.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HUBLERDON In reply to randomdinos [2016-03-15 23:59:06 +0000 UTC]

What about the rest of the tail?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

randomdinos In reply to HUBLERDON [2016-03-16 00:36:47 +0000 UTC]

Probably feathered. Maybe only halfway through the length, like the Saurian rex.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HUBLERDON In reply to randomdinos [2016-03-16 21:52:58 +0000 UTC]

But what about Dilong?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

randomdinos In reply to HUBLERDON [2016-03-16 22:38:25 +0000 UTC]

As far as I know, Dilong didn't have any bald patches, but later tyrannosaurs did.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Dontknowwhattodraw94 In reply to ??? [2016-03-15 10:58:53 +0000 UTC]

Nice to see you've uploaded it here

I have to say I don't really like the way you've made the branches. It's here as if these guys are all closely related, but two of them belong outside of Tyrannosauridae. Just some minor criticism. I personally like phylogenetic trees more like this for example because it's clearer who's more related to who: t-pekc.deviantart.com/art/Phyl…

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

aGentlemanScientist In reply to Dontknowwhattodraw94 [2016-03-15 12:50:12 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!

I know, I'll try to make these trees more professional in the future

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Dontknowwhattodraw94 In reply to aGentlemanScientist [2016-03-15 21:26:22 +0000 UTC]

You're welcome!

Okay

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MythicalRaptor3 In reply to ??? [2016-03-15 10:30:47 +0000 UTC]

Fluffasaurus Rex 

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

DakotaSauron666 In reply to ??? [2016-03-15 04:46:25 +0000 UTC]

Aah, I remember seeing this chart in the video.

And for some reason, I'm starting to find a feathered Rex VERY menacing to think about indeed.
It's as though the feathers are adding a 'cuteness cloak' to cover up what's really there: a cunning, ferocious predator that could easily gulp you up. The old scaly model makes it too obvious as a menace, which gives you a higher chance to run away. But with a feathered one like this, it's not as easy to predict, 'cause the feathers make it look cute at first, without the victim knowing there's a killer hiding behind them.
And for these reasons alone, I think it's safe to say that I'd probably be more scared of a feathered Rex than a scaly one.

Overall, excellent chart.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

aGentlemanScientist In reply to DakotaSauron666 [2016-03-15 05:00:01 +0000 UTC]

I agree! and thank you

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DakotaSauron666 In reply to aGentlemanScientist [2016-03-15 05:04:28 +0000 UTC]

Yep.
And you're welcome.

Oh, and when you mentioned that the Rex/elephant comparison is poor? I was thinking of actually drawing that.
Picture the T. rex complaining to the cameraman about the comparison, while the elephant is just standing there as if he's saying 'WTF'?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0