HOME | DD
aGentlemanScientist β My Build a Better Fake Theropod
#raptors #dinosaur #jurassicpark #paleontology #spinosaurus #theropod #triceratops #tyrannosaurus #jurassicworld #buildabetterfaketheropod
Published: 2015-06-25 04:19:29 +0000 UTC; Views: 7368; Favourites: 57; Downloads: 8
Redirect to original
Description
The Pneumatic Monstrosity!ΒThis is my imaginary dinosaur for the Jurassic World Hype! It's a hybrid of Spinosaurus, Triceratops, Dilophosaurus, and T.rex. It also possesses heavily genetically modified, gas-producing chambers inside its stomach, allowing it to literally be "lighter than air"! Its modified tail allows for zeppelin-like locomotion. I also addedΒ traheripteryx.deviantart.com/ feather-whiskers for fun!
The Pneumatic Monstrosity levitates above the ground (like a blimp), using its long arms to snatch up unlucky victims.
Related content
Comments: 114
Am I too late?
12monkehs.deviantart.com/art/Mβ¦
π: 0 β©: 0
This is really creative, I bet there's aliens out there that might move this way.
π: 0 β©: 0
First off, this is a really cool concept (though at first glance it looks aquatic). Second: I'm really enjoy your videos and I actually made a few drawings based on some of them.
newworlds117.deviantart.com/arβ¦
π: 0 β©: 0
Great job on making a Creative dinosaur
also big fan of your YouTube channel!!
π: 0 β©: 1
Thank you!
π: 0 β©: 0
Heh, when I first saw this I thought it was semi-aquatic....but really, a balloon-dinosaur is a very creative idea!
π: 0 β©: 1
Thank you
π: 0 β©: 0
Indominus rex and Ultimasaurus looks a lot better than this...floating abomination and for your information Trey the Explainer, Indominus rex is not part human, remember how intelligent the Velociraptor from Jurassic Park 1, you know the Big One. Their intelligence is the product of genetic engineering and not from being spliced with a human. I watched your review on Jurassic World and your argument was all over the place. However I do like your science explaination on the other videos you make but when it comes to Jurassic Park, you seem to hate it? why, the movie explains they all been altered by genetic engineering, even Dr. Alan Grant explains it in Jurassic Park III and Dr. Henry Wu explains it in Jurassic World.
π: 0 β©: 1
First of all that's just your opinion, it's not a scientific fact or anything, that's literally just your opinion and literally just my opinion. I will not argue matters of opinion with really anyone, it's pointless and a waste of your and mine time.Β
I dislike Jurassic World Β for reasons of my own (such as bad writing, poorly constructed and 2 dimensional characters, crap CGI as well as an over dependence on it, ect.) and now I have recognized that is nothing more than just a movie that isn't about dinosaurs, it's about movie monsters. It is not worth my time. I don't care whatever mythology the film series has done to pervert the work of real scientists on real animals. Dinosaurs and paleontology does not exist for the amusement of film studios to turn them into movie monsters; they were real animals. I literally don't care about what the series has to say about dinosaurs because they aren't dinosaurs at all; they are fictional movie monsters that have the names of real organisms tacked on them, nothing more nothing less.
and if the movie depicts creatures that aren't dinosaurs... why do they call them dinosaurs?!? I hate that excuse. "They can do whatever they want because they aren't really dinosaurs" If that's the case why don't they just make a Kaiju movie, why make a dinosaur movie without dinosaurs? It makes zero sense to me and I'm at the point were I just don't care about the series because it has nothing to do with real science, it's a fictional movie about basically magic and fantasy and therefor I have deemed it not worth of my time.Β
I dislike the series because of it's attitude and tone towards science and dinosaurs.
First of all: the first movie possesses a very strong anti-scientific message that suggested human progression and technological advancements are "unnatural", treating genetic altering as something to fear and treat like mad science, when in reality gene altering and other scientific advancements are actually extremely helpful and will most likely save humanity more than destroy it. The film has a strong negative tone against science in general, suggesting humans should not investigate science because it is "unnatural" and stuff. The film even says the "dinosaurs became extinct for a reason" (or something like that) and it is not man's place to bring them back or "play god". It's incredibly anti-progressive and Β anti-scientific. Dinosaurs did not become extinct for a reason, they became extinct because of simply a bunch of blind variables that eventually led to a mass extinction; there was no great reason for this extinct, it's just how the Universe works: luck based on pointless and meaningless reactions. That's just objectively speaking how the world works, some like to proclaim that a deity or evil or something controls everything, but science has never found any evidence of this. The film consistently says that Humans should not be curious or investigate or invent or hypothesize (or anything scientific really) because there is some "overarching power" that will destroy us for doing things "unnatural", it's just down right incorrect.
Second of all: The films consistently depict dinosaurs as mindless and violent movie monsters; not animals. Many excuse this for them being "genetic manipulated" or whatever, but at the end of the day they still call them by the scientific names of real organisms. If you want movie monsters just make something like Lord of the Rings or the Hobbit with Smaug (arguably a better and more creative design, character, performance than something like the Indominus rex). Don't call them dinosaurs if they are monsters. Dinosaurs were real animals that scientists painstakingly research to find out the truth, but for some reason people like to just treat as monsters.
π: 0 β©: 2
umm i trust your opinion that you don't like the JP series but one question
Have you ever read the original books?
or at least Michael Crichton books
i sure haven't but from what i'ved got so far
its somewhat supporting the science
and so the original movie (not in the way most people expect)
bare in mind that the extinct species if revived can be classified as invasive
you know how an invasive species can harm an environment
but i am not changing your opinion
just bringing up some points that is left out in the sea
so in relation to your point
in your view of science, will you revive extinct species and sent them out to the wild or kept in the parks (which has the potential to escape) with the potential of being invasive species to the environment at hand?
remember what factors lead to the dodos extinction.....
for me i will not, like history and life all must move on adapt or die. just keep in mind this and to all the JP fans and awesome bros
there is a big chance that real life prehistoric creatures that did not survive an extinction event will die in todays environment. for once has there been anyplace similar to that of prehistoric Antarctica, or will the flora of today be enough for them remember their plants are different than the ones here..
there are so many factorsΒ
i get it science is always about finding about the truth but remember. its a double edged sword. good and bad. remember the atomic bomb???
remember the GMO livestock
double edged
there are many things than science that is double edged, i am not going to name them
thanks for reading, take care trey loved your educational videos
π: 0 β©: 0
Well I agree with you on the science behind your argument, I don't agree with some of the stuff you talk about like the animals argument against jurassic park. The Jurassic Park series was the first dinosaur movie to depict them as animals and not monsters, also the CGI in Jurassic World when comparison to the original Jurassic park they have improved a lot and its my opinion that your confusing animatronics for the CGI in the original Jurassic Park: Most of the close ups were animatronics like when they move their head and roar or when destroying a car or when interacting directly with the actors, the CGI only came when they were doing far shots and when their mobile or when the Rexy eats the lawyer off the toilet. Yeah Jurassic World exclusively uses CGI and only one animatronic but the studio did not want to use the animatronics which in my opinion is very stupid. But I total agree on your argument about the anti-science tone of the series. I would much prefer if they would use more science like feathered dinosaurs and anatomical correct dinosaur anatomy and the dinosaurs were reversed engineered from birds rather than cloned from damaged dinosaur DNA from a mosquitoes trapped in amber.
π: 1 β©: 0
hey man its ok if your not up to it , but i hope you are, Me and are making a #BuildABetterFakeTheropodRoundTwo , and i challenge you to it!
π: 0 β©: 1
Hey Nic watched me lol
π: 0 β©: 1
comments.deviantart.com/4/1998β¦
π: 0 β©: 1
Genius creation !
Well it is a carnivore none the less
With an otter attitude
π: 0 β©: 0
Since lots of people are talking about their fake theropods in this art, I'd might as well spit it out.Β I've created a fake theropod LOOOONG before word of Jurassic World even surfaced, and mine is not as outlandish or awesomebro as any of the others.
π: 0 β©: 0
I love ur videos here's a link to musicΒ m.youtube.com/watch?v=jDatjUbYβ¦
π: 0 β©: 1
Thank you
π: 0 β©: 0
So it's basically a dragon. I keep asking myself why didn't they created a fucking dragon, that would've been so much better...
π: 0 β©: 1
You know it really wouldn't have been better.
π: 0 β©: 0
If I saw this floating towards me, I'd roll on the ground laughing before being snatched up.
π: 0 β©: 1
Me too XD
π: 0 β©: 1
I've seen your video on the Indominus Genetic makeup theory, and while the Human DNA is an interesting theory, there might've been a miscommunication when it came to the "Killing for Sport". Not saying your theory isn't good, my point is that Owen likely exaggerated the mass slaughter Indominus brings about.
My thought is, it isn't so much sport as it is merely killing indiscriminately. For a creature that grew up practically in isolation, it had nothing to learn from, nothing to teach it the concepts of the natural balance. So, with all these new creatures it's finding, it wouldn't know what else to do, perhaps it kills because it's afraid of giving the other creature a possible chance to harm it.
Think of it as being "Timid but brutally strong", though when Indominus came into contact with the four raptors, she could have learned that group behaviour would be beneficial to her own survival, and utilized her raptor traits to take advantage of the situation. Without Owen's intervention at first, Blue wouldn't have offered resistance because she knew she was outmatched due to Indominus' size and likely unpredictability.
So what it all boils down to is; Indominus at first didn't know any better, acting out of fear, but after learning about social behaviours, realized their values and saw an opportunity to "fit in".
π: 0 β©: 1
I believe that the Human-DNA plot point was originally part of the Jurassic World story (this can be seen by the Concept Art containing Part-human dino hybrids) and over time this idea was scrapped but was still somewhat kept in the story as a trait of indominus
π: 0 β©: 1
It would make sense, but my explanation would hold water too, right?
π: 0 β©: 1
The Jurassic park series has never taken science and logic into account. Applying real world logic to a series that denies it constantly is illogical
π: 0 β©: 1
Hidden by Owner
π: 0 β©: 1
You know I'm a funny guy \__^^__/
π: 0 β©: 1
Lol, what did Ledibrock spout out this time? I see you blocked all of his comments xD
π: 0 β©: 1
He tried demonizing me, making it seem I was a narcissist asshole; when In reality it is him. He also made false assumptions that I "stole" from the Nostalgia Critic, when in reality I stopped watching him years ago. He also said I am basically worthless and just a self-asserted asshole (takes one to know one, right?). He isn't worth my time and it's definitely worth my time arguing opinions on a dumb movie. It is obvious he values inaccurate movie monsters above truth and accuracy and for that I deemed talking to him pointless. I wouldn't talk to him, he is nothing but a accuracy hating fanboy that is probably just some ten-year old crying about feathered dinosaurs.Β
π: 0 β©: 1
Yeah he claims that he's impartial to science vs Hollywood, but he seems to be very neophobic. Like change is nails on a chalkboard for him.
π: 0 β©: 1
Yup, I agree with yah man; he called several videos where I simply read directly off scientific documents "facepalm-worthy" Β Β
π: 0 β©: 0
That is weird (albeit in a good way). Love your YouTube videos by the way!
π: 0 β©: 1
Thank you!
π: 0 β©: 0
Well it's something... But it certainly isn't "better". Nice artwork however 
However, nobody is taking this concept seriously. I mean, this is cute and all but it is not a better fake theropod. People think plausible looking chickens are better hybrid's than the I. rex. That is laughable. Now look, I'm all for feathers...I even class myself as a feather nazi...but that's besides the point. If you're gonna make a 'better' fake theropod I would recommend the artist to keep the design at least in association with the JP aesthetic.
I'll list the best of the hashtag here (In my humble opinion)
www.deviantart.com/art/My-Versβ¦
www.deviantart.com/art/The-Quiβ¦
www.deviantart.com/art/My-Versβ¦
www.deviantart.com/art/Biolumiβ¦
These designs are inventive but also keep with the proper aesthetic. Nobody wants a plausible looking animal as the JW big bad. That's why the I. rex was boring...but half of the ones on DA are much, much worse.
If you want, you can check out mine - www.deviantart.com/art/Hybrid-β¦
I know it isn't all that well drawn but, I think it's at least something. Not better than I. rex, however.
π: 0 β©: 3
...I could hug you right now. Honestly, the only one who actually came up with good ideas was Brian Engh himself-everyone else just half-assed it because "Hurr durr, the awesomebros are too stupid to do anything any better anyway!"
π: 0 β©: 0
Build a better fake therapod? Um... um....well I did once draw a yutyrannusΒ mixed with a saber-toothed cat to produce a prehistoric griffin, does that count? And of course there's the miniature spinosaurus mixed with a black swan ... I guess I was doing before it was cool.
Was this for your Jurassic World review? Unfortunately IΒ can't watch itΒ because I haven't seen the movie yet, but the concept of building a fake theropod certainly gave me some inspiration!
I love yours, it certainly isn't the type of generic theropod one would typically think of, like I-Rex, but a bizarre yet plausible creature. Well done!
π: 0 β©: 2
Not just you, in fact: hybrid dinosaurs have been around for a LONG time. I've seen an entire forum dedicated to it!
π: 0 β©: 1
| Next =>