HOME | DD
AlcyoneAX — Princess Toadette
#mario #mariobros #nintendo #toadette #nsmb #nsmbu #nintendofanart #supermario #supermariobros #newsupermariobros #marionintendo #peachette #newsupermario #newsupermariobrosu #toadettenintendo #nsmbud #newsupermariobrosudeluxe #nsmbudx
Published: 2018-09-14 23:59:20 +0000 UTC; Views: 35900; Favourites: 637; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
I don't have anything against Peach but, was it really neccesary?Related content
Comments: 183
Now that you mention it, Peach was known previously as Toadstool. Princess TOADstool! Could that be a hint on her relation with Toads from that angle?
If every Toad could become a human, would they get the appearance of Peach as happens with Toadette? That's... really creepy. lol
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
"Toadstool" Was just a product of American localization. She was always known as "Peach" in Japan. (It's the same situation with "Eggman" and "Robotnik." You know, it's funny how both names officially transitioned with their first full 3D title.)
Still, I like to believe this is just a testbed for how Peach herself could play in a NSMB game without committing to the full ability set. (Sort of how I feel about "Let's Go Pikachu/Eevee.")
It is a cute picture, though.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Yes, I know. I was playing along with these kind of theories so that was the first thing that came to my mind.
Haha, yeah, Super Mario 64 was the last game to use both.
It's most likely that was the reason. I think what irritated many was that they created another clone of hers when they could have picked another established character. It's the Pink Gold Peach case all over again.
Thank you!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
The best loli princess EVER X3
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
That is way better then Prachette
She just wasn’t necessary in my opinion
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I'm glad to hear so! Toadette had to be just her.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
And I have a lot of questions
like is Princess Peach a toad???
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Really, what if her crown is what makes her be in the human form?!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
My goodness you have no idea how much better this looks than the mess that is "Peachette". The worst part is that I am almost certain "Peachette" will reappear again in a future spin-off title as a separate playable character....
I know that it would not make much sense for Peach to actually be playable since she is already kidnapped....but I mean seriously, are they trying to take Toadette's identity away? I really didn't think they could hit any lower than Baby Rosalina, but I was proven wrong once again and am completely astonished by it.
It should have just been Toadette from the very beginning since having two different colored Toads (referring to Yellow and Blue Toad from Wii and U) isn't good. But if they absolutely had to have a princess playable, it should have been Daisy since they already bothered to give her a double jump in Super Mario Run.
All of that aside, this is probably the best fanart of Toadette that I have ever seen and I really hope you can do more of Princess Toadette in the future
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
That may be possible knowing Nintendo. They may consider her as her own character at one point, if not, as a skin of Peach, because that's what it actually is. The purpose of this power-up was clearly to have Peach playable so, they created a skin to justify her "abcense". They made it so obvious that it feels that is Peach with a Toadette costume rather than the other way around. Why not Toadette with a Peach costume if they wanted these abilities to carry over?
Seriously, I feel that over her identity. I refuse to believe that Toadette can take the form of Peach, it just doesn't make sense! Couldn't have they created an original human form for Toadette instead? I'd have accepted that, and I'd bet a big part of the community too.
It may look like I'm overreacting but Toadette is my favorite Mario character. Period. It's terribly disappointing to me to see her treated so poorly with this. >_<
I agree about having including Daisy as another option, since she already has that move in Super Mario Run. It would also make her first playable appearance in a main Mario game so it would have been received with open arms for that reason alone.
Oh well! Thank you very much! I'll take that in mind for any future drawing I make.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Yeah I know. I just don't understand why they keep making different versions of characters who already exist. They just need to stop...
Oh no, I do not think you are overreacting at all. Toadette is one of my favorite Mario characters as well, so I definitely understand why you are upset. I am honestly kind of upset of all the artificial attention she has been getting lately...
Exactly. Daisy and a few other characters need to be in more games and not just the sports and party games.
No problem! I look forward to seeing what you might do
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
With babies I'd understand since it became a staple since some time but, this... for that reason I really hope that this becomes a skin for Peach and stays away from Toadette after this game. Both are incompatible.
I was feeling the same. I do wonder if Toadette with a proper costume would have generated the same fuzz.
Hopefully any new iteration of Toadette I make doesn't disappoint!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Oh yeah, Baby Rosalina made sense to make since the other human characters all had a baby counterpart. The problem with Baby Rosalina, however, is that she completely destroys Rosalina's backstory since she didn't look like that when she was younger. If Baby Rosalina's design actually fit within Rosalina's backstory, she would not be so bad as a character. That being said, I still do not think these other versions of characters should be made separate playable characters. The babies in particular need to stop since they shouldn't be used in anything outside of games that take place in the past like Yoshi's Island and Mario & Luigi: Partners in Time. You know....because their BABIES and should not be doing the various things that they do
But I agree. If we do see anymore of Peachette, they need to keep it as far way from Toadette as possible.
Well, I would think that having Toadette with a proper costume would generate a lot more positive responses...but it ultimately depends on what the costume was exactly, I think.
I am almost certain it will not
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Ahh, I see, I haven't thought about that when you mentioned her. From that perspective it ruins the character and I agree! I see her as a filler in spin-off games so it personally didn't bother me as it doesn't interfere with the main games. But for that reason is that I don't want any babies in the main games. Rosalina's the only one so far with a well thought backstory; Baby Rosalina in a main game would mess with it and I'd hate it.
Wait, was that a reference? I feel I read it from somewhere but I can't say from where. o_o
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Yeah...
And no I do not think it was a reference. Which thing that I said are you asking is a reference?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
It's not biggie, haha. I used to see what seemed a C&P'd sentence that said that there things that babies shouldn't do or something, similar to yours so I remembered it. I always wondered if it was a reference to something. lol
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE! She's so cute!
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
I think the idea of Peachette is stupid, too, but this art is amazing
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Thank you very much! The worst thing is that it doesn't even make sense. I think it was thought very poorly.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
i think what that peachette idea its the most random idea of all...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
No it wasn't necessary!
Gosh... I am so warmed by this. My buddy is gonna adore this. ;w; Beautiful artwork, Alcyone!
👍: 1 ⏩: 2
I have the same thoughts! I also would have preferred the real Peach instead. This power-up is just an excuse to add a playable Peach that they couldn't for story reasons. lol
It irks me that they didn't make these abilities work on Toadette. I feel this underplays her addition since she's there as a tool, to make the power-up work; not even she's in the cover of the game.
Well, enough ranting. xP Thank you very much! 
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
Tehee, I knew it.
Aren't I precious?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
<= Prev |