HOME | DD

Alpha-Element β€” Kepler-90 System Schematic

#alpha #element #poster #schematic #space #universe #system
Published: 2014-10-26 00:00:04 +0000 UTC; Views: 2820; Favourites: 35; Downloads: 190
Redirect to original
Description

_______________________________________________________________________________________


i recommend downloadng to see all detail. also, large file size, sorry if it takes long.

_______________________________________________________________________________________


and the second most voted system! kepler-90 with its 7 planets and one of the most similar systems to our own with respect to its structure and number of planets!

you can read more about this system here:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kepler-9…


so please enjoy and leave any comments, favs or critiques which are always welcome and appreciated!

_______________________________________________________________________________________

YOU ARE FREE TO USE THIS ARTWORK FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES.
DO NOT CLAIM THIS ARTWORK TO BE YOUR OWN IN ANY WAY, REDISTRIBUTE OR SELL THIS WORK.
Related content
Comments: 13

Rainstar-of-LakeClan [2016-02-14 02:30:34 +0000 UTC]

Maybe try the HD 10180 system, which has not 7, not 8, but 9 planets. (It is a Sun-like star)

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Alpha-Element In reply to Rainstar-of-LakeClan [2016-02-21 14:07:07 +0000 UTC]

i might do it, but i'm really busy with university.

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 0

tsahel [2015-01-08 09:44:27 +0000 UTC]

very interresting !

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Alpha-Element In reply to tsahel [2015-01-11 10:53:26 +0000 UTC]

glad you like it.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

AndrewLyle [2014-10-28 18:09:13 +0000 UTC]

Thank youΒ Β new bule Moon

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Alpha-Element In reply to AndrewLyle [2014-11-01 00:38:17 +0000 UTC]

you're welcome!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

AndrewLyle In reply to Alpha-Element [2014-11-01 20:09:59 +0000 UTC]

yes but is you know to be Gliese 581 d ro g Real ever,

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Narsuaq [2014-10-26 10:07:09 +0000 UTC]

I love this. I remember being very young, like before the age of 10, I used to create my own systems and planets. Was extremely fun and fulfilling. As a fellow astro-nerd, what are the differences between Emprical Habitable Zone and Conservative Habitable Zone? Thanks. ^_^

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Alpha-Element In reply to Narsuaq [2014-10-26 10:31:31 +0000 UTC]

i'm very glad you are enjoying these posters.
and you asked a very good question. this is my interpretation of it.
the conservative habitable zone, would be the distance away from the star where any planet or moon within in it would most likely have the right temperature for liquid water to exist on its surface given enough surface pressure.
the empirical habitable zone, is similar to the conservative habitable zone, with the difference being that it is still possible to have liquid water on the planet or moon's surface, but other factors would have to be taking into account for besides just temperature, such as; surface pressure, albedo, cloud cover and greenhouse effect.

hope that kinda helps a bit.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Narsuaq In reply to Alpha-Element [2014-10-26 10:51:43 +0000 UTC]

Oh that's neat. I like the fact that you came up with it. Honestly thought it was a standard definition amongst the astronomical community. I really do like it. And I love your posters. Keep up the amazing work!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Alpha-Element In reply to Narsuaq [2014-10-26 18:25:06 +0000 UTC]

well there actually is a definition for a conservative and empirical habitable zone, but being the lazy person that i am, decided to give the one i know from memory. the actual definition shouldn't deviate too much from the ones i gave to you though!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

alpharaptor6 [2014-10-26 00:09:48 +0000 UTC]

never heard of a hot neputnian

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Alpha-Element In reply to alpharaptor6 [2014-10-26 10:49:44 +0000 UTC]

me neither, wonder if its a new class of planet discovered?
anyways thanks, i fixed that little typo.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0