HOME | DD

Art-of-Eric-Wayne β€” Death, Dissolution, and the Void

Published: 2012-01-26 14:10:55 +0000 UTC; Views: 24735; Favourites: 641; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description This is my most ambitious piece, and the one I've worked the hardest and longest on. As the title suggests, this represents my attempt to depict crossing over to the other side. Essentially, I've attempted a digital rendering of something like an after-death experience.

This image is much larger than it appears on screen and some details can't be seen clearly, or at all, in the reduced version.

People will have different reactions to this image, and different interpretations, but I'd like to offer a guide to interpreting it as I intended it. The image illustrates a process which can be read as moving in stages from the left to right, which also works as back to front. [Note that to get a really good feel for this image you can focus on the ball on the right as being far above the figures, and then look down at them from that vantage point. Admittedly it makes me a bit uncomfortable to do that, and I generally prefer to appreciate the image on the level of surface beauty.] In other words, the image doesn't portray an instant, but a timeline (ex., there are not two heads but just one in different stages of disintegration).

On the left side of the image is a figure merged into an amalgam of all materials which is cracking and folding over on itself as it approaches the center barrier. I see this as the end of physical dying, when the mental ability to interpret the material world atrophies, and thus the material world along with it. Material can't cross the center divide, and the person's corporeal existence is shed as he passes through a dividing plane or membrane, in a process of shuttling through layers of dimensions.

You can see left of the center of the image a stark division between the material and immaterial dimensions, and something like a force field, layer or membrane intersecting them perpendicularly and separating them. The layer has a hole where the person is crossing through, causing a temporary tear in the fabric of reality (for lack of a better phrasing), and ripples in the surface of the immaterial realm. Something biological and blood-like – a last vestige of bodily existence – is splattered along the ripples.

The second head is no longer material at all, an image as on film, floating briefly on the surface of the intersecting layer, and only lasting as a fleeting memory on the other side.

The kaleidoscopic sphere is something like a disembodied spirit, no longer identified with the former host body, of which it's been cleansed, and without thought or memory.

On the right is a giant ball or cavity, depending on how you look at it (a deliberate optical illusion on my part), that represents the overpowering, crushing reality of the void. Notice it is poised ominously above the heads, as if it could bounce on them or roll over them. The spherical spirit only produces a slight glow as it merges with the void. The spirit will evaporate and be (re)integrated with the timeless, space-less potential of the void.

Notice the head on the left is not looking at the giant ball above it, but averting it's eyes back to the material realm soon to be left inexorably behind. For what it's worth, according to the Bardo Thodol, or The Tibetan Book of the Dead, most people would prefer to be cast onto the rack of any incarnation rather than face obliteration in the void. I meant for there to be an element of the mysterium tremendum to this image: the wholly appropriate fear at the foot of god, to put it bluntly, though not exactly literally.

The interpretation isn't as important as just the general feel of a place or places outside of consensual reality, an intersecting of realities, and the possibility of non-corporeal existence, however ephemeral and subjective. It should be a little frightening, as is any sudden immersion in the unknown and unforeseen. At some point in the future I may share my original inspiration for this piece.

Notes:
I added a Flash animation of the process here:


I added a close-up of the two heads here:


There's a page on my website all about this image here: [link]

REJECTED BY: and more than a few others

YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE:

Related content
Comments: 204

Art-of-Eric-Wayne In reply to ??? [2012-02-23 08:41:38 +0000 UTC]

Thanks! Glad you appreciate it.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

corvus-corone-corone In reply to ??? [2012-02-10 20:27:57 +0000 UTC]

Why the gecko? As a previous incarnation?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Art-of-Eric-Wayne In reply to corvus-corone-corone [2012-02-11 08:21:02 +0000 UTC]

It was my pet and it died while I was working on this piece, so I integrated it. Seemed appropriate at the time. Plus they are my favorite animal. And it also just alludes to clinging to things we value or cherish, trying to take them with us, and attachment in general. Also reflects on our own animal nature, libido, and corporeality. But, I don't actually believe in reincarnation myself. It just seems incredibly unlikely, except as a metaphor.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

corvus-corone-corone In reply to Art-of-Eric-Wayne [2012-02-11 09:23:50 +0000 UTC]

Oh, I see. Thanks for the explanation
I thought seeing as you depict some busshist themes you might be buddhist yourself.
I don't believe in reincarnation, either. Remarkable piece of art, this.
And you're right, geckos are seriously cool

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

undeaddogboy In reply to ??? [2012-02-10 01:30:02 +0000 UTC]

I see a depiction of 2 different states of existence separated primarily by the way the wave forms and resonances express - like 2 different "media" in which the same fundamental energy is manifesting in two different ways of being.
But then, I might be looking at it opposite to what you intended. I see the "void" as being a source of these emanations - like everything is coming out of the void, rather than being consumed by it.
At any rate, I think it is a tremendous achievement.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Art-of-Eric-Wayne In reply to undeaddogboy [2012-02-10 02:14:29 +0000 UTC]

Wow, thanks. You're right that I see it as everything being consumed (reunited?) by the void, rather than the void being the source, but those things might not be mutually exclusive. I think you are saying something along the lines of the two sides representing different simultaneous levels of existence, such as in different planes. But that's just me trying to put it in my own words. The level you art talking about this piece is already outside of consensual reality, and that's what I was trying to depict (something on the other side).

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

nelchee In reply to ??? [2012-02-06 11:30:06 +0000 UTC]

Very interesting piece and a wonderful execution.
I think you're right when you say that the experience of stripping the Ego won't be a very pleasant one. Actually I have heard accounts of people who went through the NDEs that they went through a similar process of a kind, where all their "wordly-ness" was stripped off, and that it was painful - but looking back to it - a liberating experience. However they got back to life afterwards.
I am always interested to see other people's visions of such things, because I think we are each given a piece of the puzzle and only by completing it together can we realize the truth

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Art-of-Eric-Wayne In reply to nelchee [2012-02-06 13:19:42 +0000 UTC]

Thanks, and I like your ideas here. Related to the dissolution of the ego, is the dismantling of language. We spend most of our lives talking to ourselves in our own heads, leading rhetorical existences, and coming up with reasons and justifications for our very being. That can all be blown over like a castle made of toothpicks and glue.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

nelchee In reply to Art-of-Eric-Wayne [2012-02-06 17:28:07 +0000 UTC]

I like this view of yours, it makes sense.
While on the subject of language, just today a friend posted this funny, but accurate article from Cracked, and while it may be inappropriate under such a work, I'm still going to link it because you might like it [link]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Art-of-Eric-Wayne In reply to nelchee [2012-02-06 18:12:11 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, some of that article is pretty interesting. I guess I should keep up learning Chinese, just to help me "act" in two languages. Have you even noticed it's almost impossible to stop making sentences in your mind? If we couldn't sit still, could we say we were in control of our bodies? No. But we can't keep our minds still, even for a moment, unless we have really practiced this. So can we say we are in control of our minds? No. We habitually, incessantly, spin a cocoon of rhetoric around ourselves, justifying, contextualizing, and legitimizing our being. And yet that language-based self-perception is all artifice and accumulated/learned cultural baggage. It actually separates us from the real.

Just rambling. Rambling on.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

metalromantica In reply to ??? [2012-02-04 16:36:16 +0000 UTC]

Outstanding artwork....Did you ever see the movie "Γ‹nter The Viod"by Gaspar Noe (?).....interesting... with a very Buddhist concept about life and death and the process of dissolution between the two....this artpiece reminds me a lot that movie...or the concept at the Tibetan Book of Life and Death....

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

Art-of-Eric-Wayne In reply to metalromantica [2012-02-06 07:31:12 +0000 UTC]

I watched that movie last night. It was quite interesting and powerful, with some things I'd never seen attempted before. The car accident flashbacks were brutal. Not surprisingly, the movie was a complete and utter box-office disaster (people prefer to be force-fed cliches, I guess). The concept was great. I hesitate to add any criticism, but in my particular case, I kept waiting for him to cross over and go into the void, but he just kept bobbing around in this reality, except when transitioning between places. I expected him to finally keep going in the direction of the transitional phase (which I thought was the starting point), and not just keep coming back. He never breached into the clear, azure void. But we can't all have the same subjective impression or vision of such things.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

metalromantica In reply to Art-of-Eric-Wayne [2012-02-07 03:02:19 +0000 UTC]

Ohh great!...that movie gave me a lot to think and read ...The Tibetan book of life and death say that is very dificult to get into the void after we die because in the transition proccess are a lot of distraccion like spirits or kind of demons and the "consciousness or soul" is lost and ends in a new reincarnation or new life....
it becomes a cycle so they say that he who breaks this cycle is really an enlightened one...but is very subjective vision like you said who can really know what happen after we die.....

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Art-of-Eric-Wayne In reply to metalromantica [2012-02-07 03:16:18 +0000 UTC]

My understanding of the Bardo Thodol (Tibetan Book) is just a little different. It's not so difficult to get into the void. The difficult thing is being able to stay in there, because it's just too overwhelming. The enlightened person is the one who can handle being there. The rest of us would claw our way back to any incarnation rather than be dispersed into the void. It's definitely not some syrupy mysticism where it's all comforting and loving after death. Why would having one's inner eye completely pealed to reveal everything be comforting?

Often, I think, "visionary art" has to be somehow soothing or reassuring, otherwise it's seen as not truly visionary. But I tend to think the opposite. If it's so soothing, it's less real than me sitting here at the computer looking at the monitor. It's not a portal into the void, it's just an illustration in this reality of an ideal of some reassuring fantasy. But that's just my opinion.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

metalromantica In reply to Art-of-Eric-Wayne [2012-02-07 03:58:31 +0000 UTC]

ohhhh I'm sorry...the book I'm talking/written about is "The tibetan Book of living and dying" by Soygal Rinpomche not the Bardo Thodol...but some of that Buddhist vision has been misunderstood .... I do not think it's something comforting whatever you have after death .... death itself is a shock .... something that surely is not assimilated but long after you run out of body...
I like the vision of the Hinduist old wise man or Advaita Vedanta also...
some of its concepts and philosophy are very handy/practical .... almost like Buddhism ... of course if taken as a philosophy and not religion...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Art-of-Eric-Wayne In reply to metalromantica [2012-02-07 04:51:54 +0000 UTC]

I agree. As a philosophy, Buddhism has a lot of offer, especially in terms of dealing with situations and overcoming the ego and selfishness in daily life. You might enjoy "advaita," which is a branch of Hinduism. Try looking up "I AM THAT," by Nisargadatta Maharaj, if you have time. It's similar to Buddhism, but more to the point and less clouded in metaphor.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

metalromantica In reply to Art-of-Eric-Wayne [2012-02-07 17:39:59 +0000 UTC]

I like "Γ„dvaita".....I'm reading Ramana Maharshi("the conversations or discussions with Ramana M")...I'll look for Nisargadatta material to read it...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Art-of-Eric-Wayne In reply to metalromantica [2012-02-07 18:46:58 +0000 UTC]

Wow! It REALLY is not wonder we have similar interests and aesthetic sensibilities. I'm a fan of Ramana Maharshi as well, but found Nisargadatta Maharaj much more accessible, but it might have just been the particular texts of Maharshi's that I was looking at, which were comparatively fairly erudite.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

metalromantica In reply to Art-of-Eric-Wayne [2012-02-08 01:45:13 +0000 UTC]

...Ohh now that you tell me that Nisargadatta is more accessible I'll look for that specific book/writting you recomended....thank you!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Art-of-Eric-Wayne In reply to metalromantica [2012-02-05 03:28:15 +0000 UTC]

That's some of what I was going for. I haven't seen that movie. I just looked it up. I'm going to try to track it down, because it looks interesting. So glad you like this work!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

metalromantica In reply to Art-of-Eric-Wayne [2012-02-07 03:06:35 +0000 UTC]

love this artpiece!...glad you like the movie!...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

kachicache In reply to ??? [2012-02-03 17:37:24 +0000 UTC]

Amazing work, love it! love the concept and the execution!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Art-of-Eric-Wayne In reply to kachicache [2012-02-03 19:35:02 +0000 UTC]

Awesome. Thanks so much! You seem to get what I'm doing. That's great.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

natteregn In reply to ??? [2012-02-02 20:23:58 +0000 UTC]

this... leave me spreachless oo

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Art-of-Eric-Wayne In reply to natteregn [2012-02-03 03:41:22 +0000 UTC]

Cool. Thanks!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

natteregn In reply to Art-of-Eric-Wayne [2012-02-03 11:34:38 +0000 UTC]

you are so welcome!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

MirachRavaia In reply to ??? [2012-02-02 13:37:04 +0000 UTC]

You touch the greatest mystery. Amazing.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Art-of-Eric-Wayne In reply to MirachRavaia [2012-02-02 14:06:28 +0000 UTC]

Really appreciate that you see that in my work!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

MirachRavaia In reply to Art-of-Eric-Wayne [2012-02-02 14:17:02 +0000 UTC]

Is it painted traditionally or digitally, if I can ask? The progress animation suggests it's digital, but it's the traditional art cathegory...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Art-of-Eric-Wayne In reply to MirachRavaia [2012-02-02 14:57:51 +0000 UTC]

I should probably move it. It doesn't really fit comfortably in any categories. It's not "surreal" or "fantasy" or "emotional" for example. It's done mostly on the computer, but doesn't rely on the computer for any of the rendering. I use PhotoShop, but not fractal programs or anything like that. Because of my background in drawing, painting, photography and sculpture, it looks traditional rather than digital.

But I'll move it to the digital section just the same.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

chipiri [2012-01-29 02:39:16 +0000 UTC]

holy...incredible

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Art-of-Eric-Wayne In reply to chipiri [2012-01-29 03:36:45 +0000 UTC]

So glad that people such as yourself are resonating with this work. Tnanks!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

lobs2 [2012-01-28 12:11:38 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Stepbeyond In reply to ??? [2012-01-28 03:13:08 +0000 UTC]

wonderfully done. I understand how art takes a beating on the internet. This must be dazzling in person. What size is it?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Art-of-Eric-Wayne In reply to Stepbeyond [2012-01-28 03:31:15 +0000 UTC]

thanks Stepbeyond!

this one looks good on the internet, I think, because when I worked on it I was looking at a monitor, and then that's also the way it's displayed. Since I started it in 2003, and it was quite difficult to work on very large PS files back then (at least on my computer of the time), it's not THAT bit. It's about 24 inches wide at 300 dpi. But it can print bigger that that.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Stepbeyond In reply to Art-of-Eric-Wayne [2012-01-29 03:14:42 +0000 UTC]

I understand. Thanks for the explaination

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Zilcho32 [2012-01-28 00:20:35 +0000 UTC]

From the title, this is not quite what I expected. I expected to see one of those Tibetan Buddhist style pieces with the seed syllables etc, a la Alex Grey,but what I see is something quite different. It looks almost harrowing, not a traditional "peaceful" religious experience. So in this way, I would say that you have created a more than adequate depiction of your own honest response to the subject. You say that you have put many, many hours into this, and it really does show. Overall, I would say it is a sensitive and honest portrayal of an unknown experience, as you envisage it, and the technique shows an intimate knowledge of the artistic elements and principles, as well as considerable purely technical skill. Sure beats the Happy Pukey Frog and Wild Kitty!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Art-of-Eric-Wayne In reply to Zilcho32 [2012-01-28 02:52:13 +0000 UTC]

I like your take on it. You're totally right about it not being in the Alex Grey style, or using the traditional sorts of imagery and even props one would associate with the subject. I'm a huge fan of Alex Grey (and think he's underrated in the "fine art" world), but he has a lot of imitators, and is himself derivative of Mati Klarwein, who did that whole style FIRST (and Grey acknowledged his indebtedness to Klarwein).

I wanted to put the viewer there, on the other side, not still on this side looking at an illustration of an idea or concept which also coincides nicely with traditional imagery about the same thing. As you said, instead of showing a peaceful or assuaging image that would put people's mind at ease about death, my depiction shows it as something that is not going to be so easy at all, because one isn't going to get to keep one's precious ego or body or associations or the whole context of reality (call it the simulacrum) that we superimpose on the real and mistake for it. Do people really think, for example, that a confrontation with God, just as an example, wouldn't be unnerving on a epoch scale?

We may just fade out into dust and unconscious nothingness. But this image depicts another possibility, and another reality. Also, incidentally, one ins which the most egotistical and selfish of us would suffer the most. But those ideas aren't as important as just the immediacy of the sense of another reality, on the flips side, that one might cross over into.

I ramble on.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Zilcho32 In reply to Art-of-Eric-Wayne [2012-01-28 03:16:21 +0000 UTC]

It's profoundly interesting, this subject, and because the experience is unknown, (at least to most people's conscious awareness, I am willing to entertain the idea of reincarnation, and that there are those that can recall the experience), it is really a blank canvas onto which we can project our fears, hopes and delusions. So, any interpretation is valid, I think, and I dig the honesty and thoughtfulness of your interpretation. Your art is unique and interesting.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Art-of-Eric-Wayne In reply to Zilcho32 [2012-01-28 03:32:50 +0000 UTC]

thanks for those words. I agree with you.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Zilcho32 In reply to Art-of-Eric-Wayne [2012-01-28 03:34:46 +0000 UTC]

You're welcome.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Hyoga1 In reply to ??? [2012-01-27 20:01:08 +0000 UTC]

excellent

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Art-of-Eric-Wayne In reply to Hyoga1 [2012-01-28 02:27:08 +0000 UTC]

Thanks Hyoga!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

creativemikey In reply to ??? [2012-01-27 17:25:28 +0000 UTC]

Trippy!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Art-of-Eric-Wayne In reply to creativemikey [2012-01-27 17:30:06 +0000 UTC]

One could say that. Thanks.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ricky4 In reply to ??? [2012-01-27 16:35:09 +0000 UTC]

Exquisite piece!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Art-of-Eric-Wayne In reply to ricky4 [2012-01-27 16:48:42 +0000 UTC]

Appreciate your comment!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Campo-Diaz In reply to ??? [2012-01-27 16:30:26 +0000 UTC]

Excellent work.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Art-of-Eric-Wayne In reply to Campo-Diaz [2012-01-27 16:47:06 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for your support!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

DavidAnthonyNunez In reply to ??? [2012-01-27 13:56:03 +0000 UTC]

Pure art

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1


<= Prev | | Next =>