HOME | DD

artbyjrc — First trunks - Basal proboscideans

#elephant #extinct #oligocene #barytherium #moeritherium #eritherium #numidotherium #phosphatherium #eocene #proboscidean #palaeocene
Published: 2021-03-04 09:22:08 +0000 UTC; Views: 33126; Favourites: 323; Downloads: 62
Redirect to original
Description

A selection of basal forms of proboscideans, to scale.

Along with horses (equids) and apes (hominids), elephants have a long evolutionary history scattered with numerous fossils. Living elephants are just the final remnant of a vast range of species, some of which have been discussed in previous posts: Hoe-tuskers - DeinotheresNot elephants 1 - Mastodons and Not elephants 2 - Gomphotheres . The earliest members of the Proboscidea were smaller and show less of the derived features that are familiar in later species.

One notable feature which changed was the decrease in the number of incisors with later groups. Early forms had up to three pairs in the upper jaw and two in the latter, while later species (deinotheres and elephantiforms) only had a maximum of a single pair of tusks in either jaw. There is some argument as to whether the tusks of later groups are derived from incisors, but this seems to be the most logical conclusion. Other adaptations to the skull saw a shortening of the face and a retraction of the nasal opening. As proboscideans grew larger their stance also changed to a graviportal one supported by columnar legs. Early forms had more angular legs and plantigrade feet.

Living only 5 million years after the K-Pg extinction event was the oldest, smallest and most primitive proboscidean. Eritherium stood only 20 cms at the shoulder. Structurally it's teeth were similar to the distantly related manatees and embrithopods, and uniquely among proboscideans Eritherium had a full set of teeth including canines. The orbits were placed forward in the skull, a feature which shifted towards the rear in later forms.

Phosphatherium had the typical low skull of other proboscideans but lacked the structures for any trunk. Teeth and jaw musculature are markedly different between males and females. Scratch marks on the teeth indicated that Phosphatherium had a broad diet of rough vegetation which may also included animal matter.

Some of the best skeletal material is known from Numidotherium. Unlike the low slung body shape of other basal forms, this proboscidean was more terrestrial with relatively long limbs and would have most resembled a tapir. An elongated nasal opening shows that Numidotherium had a short trunk while the enlarged incisors protruded forwards.

The first large-sized proboscideans appeared during the Late Eocene. Standing 2 metres at the shoulder. Barytherium was a graviportal species that evidently spent alot of time in water. Unlike later proboscideans it retained the plantigrade feet. There were four short tusks in both jaws with the upper ones being vertical and pointed outwards, while the lower tusks projected forwards. They were likely used to shear vegetation. Barytherium probably had a small proboscis as the attachment points on the skull are not strongly defined.

Now considered a side branch of proboscidean evolution, the familiar Moeritherium was once believed to be 'the' ancestral elephant. There are several species known and all are extremely elongate with short limbs for a semi-aquatic life in estuarine wetlands. Moeritherium had a long cranium, high placed eyes and long tusk-like second incisors. Being low to the ground, a trunk would have been a very unlikely feature. Two early elephantiforms, Phiomia and Palaeomastodon lived alongside Moeritherium in the Eocene Fayum Formation. This was the lineage that would go on to produce mastodons, gomphotheres and true elephants.

Related content
Comments: 45

Doofingus [2025-03-05 13:46:27 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

gilangagil [2024-10-23 03:33:20 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

Jdailey1991 [2024-04-14 05:29:21 +0000 UTC]

👍: 2 ⏩: 1

artbyjrc In reply to Jdailey1991 [2024-04-14 11:18:48 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Garo123456 [2024-01-08 18:55:13 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

DonnieandDougie [2022-03-07 03:35:22 +0000 UTC]

👍: 2 ⏩: 1

artbyjrc In reply to DonnieandDougie [2022-03-07 08:39:00 +0000 UTC]

👍: 2 ⏩: 1

DonnieandDougie In reply to artbyjrc [2022-03-07 12:01:32 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 1

artbyjrc In reply to DonnieandDougie [2022-03-07 14:38:43 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

acepredator [2021-11-24 15:16:27 +0000 UTC]

👍: 2 ⏩: 1

artbyjrc In reply to acepredator [2021-11-24 18:13:59 +0000 UTC]

👍: 2 ⏩: 1

Dylan613 In reply to artbyjrc [2022-10-31 20:47:20 +0000 UTC]

👍: 2 ⏩: 1

artbyjrc In reply to Dylan613 [2022-10-31 20:56:35 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Dylan613 In reply to artbyjrc [2022-10-31 20:57:28 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Lanval-de-Lai [2021-04-18 00:38:41 +0000 UTC]

👍: 2 ⏩: 1

artbyjrc In reply to Lanval-de-Lai [2021-04-18 15:19:45 +0000 UTC]

👍: 2 ⏩: 1

Lanval-de-Lai In reply to artbyjrc [2021-04-18 16:38:59 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 1

artbyjrc In reply to Lanval-de-Lai [2021-04-18 17:06:21 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

Olmagon [2021-03-07 14:56:56 +0000 UTC]

👍: 3 ⏩: 1

artbyjrc In reply to Olmagon [2021-03-07 18:30:03 +0000 UTC]

👍: 2 ⏩: 0

torm28 [2021-03-05 05:20:38 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

AlfaPachyDerm [2021-03-04 23:55:52 +0000 UTC]

👍: 2 ⏩: 1

artbyjrc In reply to AlfaPachyDerm [2021-03-05 11:54:13 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

elandlover52 [2021-03-04 14:36:41 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 1

artbyjrc In reply to elandlover52 [2021-03-04 16:16:43 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 1

elandlover52 In reply to artbyjrc [2021-03-04 16:37:16 +0000 UTC]

👍: 2 ⏩: 1

artbyjrc In reply to elandlover52 [2021-03-04 16:54:11 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 1

ThalassoAtrox In reply to artbyjrc [2021-03-04 17:55:04 +0000 UTC]

👍: 2 ⏩: 0

TheWatcherofWorlds [2021-03-04 13:11:28 +0000 UTC]

👍: 2 ⏩: 1

artbyjrc In reply to TheWatcherofWorlds [2021-03-04 13:34:35 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TheWatcherofWorlds In reply to artbyjrc [2021-03-04 13:59:05 +0000 UTC]

👍: 3 ⏩: 1

artbyjrc In reply to TheWatcherofWorlds [2021-03-04 14:19:21 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

TheAquariumSlider In reply to artbyjrc [2021-03-04 15:50:50 +0000 UTC]

Similar to Equatorial Africa.During that time,it was slightly south.

👍: 1 ⏩: 1

artbyjrc In reply to TheAquariumSlider [2021-03-04 16:14:48 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TheAquariumSlider In reply to artbyjrc [2021-03-04 16:34:53 +0000 UTC]

It wan't that far removed.But it also helped that the climate was warmer than today.With climate change,N.Africa could become again a lush place.

👍: 1 ⏩: 1

artbyjrc In reply to TheAquariumSlider [2021-03-04 16:56:11 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TheWatcherofWorlds In reply to artbyjrc [2021-03-04 15:22:53 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 1

artbyjrc In reply to TheWatcherofWorlds [2021-03-04 16:15:25 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ThalassoAtrox [2021-03-04 12:31:04 +0000 UTC]

👍: 3 ⏩: 2

adventi In reply to ThalassoAtrox [2021-03-04 17:39:08 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 1

ThalassoAtrox In reply to adventi [2021-03-04 17:47:55 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 1

artbyjrc In reply to ThalassoAtrox [2021-03-05 12:11:46 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

artbyjrc In reply to ThalassoAtrox [2021-03-04 12:36:46 +0000 UTC]

👍: 3 ⏩: 1

TheAquariumSlider In reply to artbyjrc [2021-03-04 15:53:26 +0000 UTC]

Artiodactyls were kind of there in the late Eocene.Hippo relatives got somehow to Africa,despite the fact that the sea level was higher at the time.Anthracotheriids if i'm not mistaken.

👍: 2 ⏩: 1

artbyjrc In reply to TheAquariumSlider [2021-03-04 16:12:36 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0