HOME | DD
ArtOriginal β almost a camel toe
Published: 2010-07-29 07:58:36 +0000 UTC; Views: 51392; Favourites: 349; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
Related content
Comments: 24
Wow. Now I'm going to slop my vagina onto a scanner and call it art.
Seriously though, do you post pictures of your ass cos of the easy attention?
Cos I have and ass. And boobies. I could do the same but I have the dignity not to.
π: 0 β©: 1
Are you serious? How'd this get into the popular deviations?
Oh, wait, duh. It's a panty shot, of course.
π: 0 β©: 0
TRES BELLE PLASTIQUE CORPORELLE! I TRANSLATE VERY PRETTY BODY PLASTIC
π: 0 β©: 0
I'm not even sure what to say to this. While my own work may not be the greatest...
I do know that art is supposed to provoke emotion or make the viewer think.
...Something to make a person look deep into your art and think 'wow, I just wonder what he/she meant.'
What really makes true art is the emotion that's in it. In my own opinion I'm not feeling anything.
"Almost a Camel Toe" - and then you look at the picture and it's 'almost a camel toe.'
While I agree that this idea had massive potential, I think you got lost in trying to make a title that was clever or
made the viewer think rather than an image that could.
π: 0 β©: 1
While I think this had potential...I'm not really big on it. Part of this is that the name kind of turned me off to this piece immediately. And then when I realized it was a two part series featuring the same thing at different angles(and not very different, I might add) I was turned off to it even more. While you could have had a very good shot, it just doesn't seem like you took the opportunity to go outside of your comfort zone. I'm not saying nude, or anything like that. But this, to me, isn't art. It's simply the picture of someone's behind... Sorry.
π: 0 β©: 2
Well, first of all, I don't want to be rude or anything, but that sig of yours across half of the photo really ruins it all.
Second of all, while some may (and will) argue that this IS art (and I don't really mind, everyone is entitled to their own opinion and so am I), seeing the same shots of your ass in the same positions almost every time kind of does get repetitive and boring and to be honest, I don't see much of artistic value in this as opposed to, let's say this: [link]
Just my two cents. :/
π: 0 β©: 3
I agree. The concept may have had potential but this is just such a crude shot.
π: 0 β©: 1
To be honest, I'm not really sure what we are supposed to take from this. In my opinion, although I might be slated for having no artwork of my own up to be criticized, this is not art. It's a crude/cheap shot of her butt, which, if it had been done with a little more artistic finesse, could have possible produced a far better piece. It's almost as if after the first picture, the artist got some positive feedback, so they thought; "Let's do the exact same shot again, from a worse angle". I mean seriously?
On a side note, if you are going to do shots such as these, perhaps at least wearing some sort of... well, presentable underwear might be a good idea? :/
π: 0 β©: 0
It isn't really art at all, it is just there. Its stupid how people put such nonsense on here like this but thanks to perverted society it gets a lot of attention because of the sexual aspect, not the artistic aspect.
π: 0 β©: 1
One of the few reasons why women are portrayed as just some sex objects and still follow the ideal look and not just follow their own will.
Jez, man
π: 0 β©: 0
I agree,
and then, It is not by showing his ass and is his dick that we make some art...
π: 0 β©: 0
I'm sure you have a beautiful mind too...and your personality is probably great but...a butt
π: 0 β©: 0
Every shot a favorite, light, angle, pose, tone, model!
π: 0 β©: 0
