HOME | DD

Published: 2004-11-07 14:43:34 +0000 UTC; Views: 1724; Favourites: 26; Downloads: 414
Redirect to original
Description
A colored version of my previous Deviation of the same name.Related content
Comments: 20
Lucas-Stl [2021-09-17 00:46:00 +0000 UTC]
π: 1 β©: 1
Lyeekha [2009-03-21 19:03:12 +0000 UTC]
Aiaiai. You did it again.
...it is "Babel" fish though. -fryingpan'd-
π: 0 β©: 1
Artoveli In reply to Lyeekha [2009-03-21 23:10:16 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, I don't know why I spelled it that way, I know it's supposed to be "Babel"...
π: 0 β©: 0
Artoveli In reply to antidamage [2008-04-24 15:58:19 +0000 UTC]
Thanks! This is a rather old picture.
π: 0 β©: 0
Connorchap [2008-02-05 01:07:51 +0000 UTC]
I love your illustration of Ford! It's perfect!
π: 0 β©: 1
Artoveli In reply to Connorchap [2008-02-05 03:57:34 +0000 UTC]
Ah, thanks! I've been wanting to do more HHGG fanart lately...
π: 0 β©: 1
Connorchap In reply to Artoveli [2008-02-05 19:46:45 +0000 UTC]
We all approve of this!
π: 0 β©: 0
Artoveli In reply to ensoul [2005-05-18 19:53:42 +0000 UTC]
It's a great scene! I have to say, I thought Martin Freeman acted that scene fairly well in the movie.
π: 0 β©: 1
Spaceman-Chris [2004-11-09 13:21:11 +0000 UTC]
wow, I love seeing HHG fanart! I love your portrayal of Ford
π: 0 β©: 1
Artoveli In reply to Spaceman-Chris [2004-11-09 19:48:04 +0000 UTC]
Thanks. This Ford is beginning to grow on me too actually!
π: 0 β©: 0
Ka-li-ko [2004-11-08 09:39:31 +0000 UTC]
YEYZ Now it's colored!
Really cannot help but love Ford's deadpan expression. It's so... perfect. Just right. And the satchel, too.
But people really need to make a 'Get Ford Better Clothes' club or something. He's always so eccentrically dressed it makes me wonder if shops actually sell those clothes ever... But who cares
π: 0 β©: 1
Artoveli In reply to Ka-li-ko [2004-11-08 12:36:49 +0000 UTC]
Naw, Ford's Ford because of the strange clothes he wears! Still, He's got to be runner-up after Zaphod for the 'Worst Dressed Sentient Being the the Galaxy' award.
π: 0 β©: 1
Ka-li-ko In reply to Artoveli [2004-11-08 12:38:30 +0000 UTC]
*sniff* You're painfully right...
π: 0 β©: 0