HOME | DD

Published: 2007-08-03 03:52:47 +0000 UTC; Views: 2511; Favourites: 50; Downloads: 50
Redirect to original
Description
Wow.
Jeff and I just spent a good 15 minutes discussing how this piece should be arranged, based on our very different personal opinions. (Mine being the dominant one of course, since I put in all the time to create the piece!) I recognize that the subject is dressed in a Victorian-esque outfit, and that the general feel of the piece is vintage, so it would be natural to make this a portrait; however, I love negative space and didn't want her to feel too cropped. (After all, her feet are already missing- I'm just no good at painting in what isn't there to begin with.) On the other hand, Jeff felt that all the negative space was unnecessary and that because of her manner of dress the piece should be cropped as more of a portrait. I experimented with cropping it his way, and then flipped back and forth to see what I liked better- I personally think this is the better layout. His way looked very nice too.
If anyone else has any opinions on the matter, feel free to say so!
STOCK
Girl- 2 separate pictures from ~THT-stock
Companion- Dog & Jeans from sxc.hu
Chair- ~puddlzstock
Background- combination of ^radioPooh , ~Tracie76Stock and Misty morning from sxc.hu
Texture- =muted-pain
Brushes- ~Trisste-stock
Related content
Comments: 27
Luincir [2007-09-05 09:07:39 +0000 UTC]
OMG, she is SO creepy! But I like the composition too.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
beanhugger In reply to Luincir [2007-09-05 19:32:31 +0000 UTC]
She is creepy! I love creepy things.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
beanhugger In reply to alana-m [2007-09-04 18:51:42 +0000 UTC]
Me too! Jeff totally lost this one. Lol.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
mmenathalie [2007-08-25 17:04:58 +0000 UTC]
Hello!
Congratulations, this work has been featured at "Visual Senses" article: [link]
Please, do not comment here, but only under the news article.
Thank you and wish you more fantastic works!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
endlessjeff [2007-08-12 04:25:57 +0000 UTC]
Blah blah blah, fine, I'm wrong.
I was worried it wouldn't be balanced like this, but the fact that it's brighter on the right balances it for me. Looks good.
Thanks for asking for my opinion even though you rejected it anyway.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
beanhugger In reply to endlessjeff [2007-08-12 18:36:23 +0000 UTC]
Haha, Jeff- right now you're making fun of me from across the room for denying that I "rejected" your opinion, but I swear I didn't! I just like this way more.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
OwlInTheMirror [2007-08-10 00:03:56 +0000 UTC]
Very nicely done -- and I like the use of the negative space, too. You've incorporated a lovely surreal/dreamy quality that really makes the picture.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
beanhugger In reply to OwlInTheMirror [2007-08-10 00:23:14 +0000 UTC]
Thank you for agreeing on the negative space debacle! We all sure showed Jeff.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
JeanFan [2007-08-03 20:38:35 +0000 UTC]
it's gorgeous
but it's photomanipulation not photography
there's a section for Conceptual in the Photomanipulation category too
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
beanhugger In reply to JeanFan [2007-08-03 21:32:03 +0000 UTC]
I know, I've got it in the wrong category- I'm changing it now!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
blue-blossom [2007-08-03 13:43:44 +0000 UTC]
I think the negative space option is better indeed The combination between the styles is great and I see you have been experimenting lately, which I always admire
The combination between the vintage model and the negative space works great in my opinion and it gives the piece a very eerie surreal atmosphere
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
beanhugger In reply to blue-blossom [2007-08-03 14:22:57 +0000 UTC]
Thank you very much for your opinion! I feel I made the right choice with it, but if I ever change my mind at least I know that I can edit it easily. I'm very glad you like it, and that you approve of my experimenting madness.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
blue-blossom In reply to beanhugger [2007-08-04 09:35:23 +0000 UTC]
I always appreciate experimenting madness, I think it's vital to find your own style , and to always bring something fresh and new to it once you find it!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
beanhugger In reply to blue-blossom [2007-08-04 13:26:41 +0000 UTC]
Well, that's a good goal to have! I'm trying my hardest.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Johdie [2007-08-03 11:10:11 +0000 UTC]
Nice combination of stock, and I think the composition is fine like this. Nice colours, and a good feel. Why is this in photography when your other work is in photomanip though?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
beanhugger In reply to Johdie [2007-08-03 12:49:35 +0000 UTC]
Uh oh! I put it in the wrong category! I'll fix it ASAP. Thank you, I'm glad you like it the way it is! I'm going to start a tally between me and Jeff.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
beanhugger In reply to Violett-von-Traum [2007-08-03 12:50:12 +0000 UTC]
Thank you very much!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Rhyagelle [2007-08-03 07:08:16 +0000 UTC]
Negative space is brilliant! I'm glad you didn't crop
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
beanhugger In reply to Rhyagelle [2007-08-03 12:50:01 +0000 UTC]
I'll let Jeff know, lol! The more there isn't to look at, the better, I think.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0