HOME | DD
BishopSteiner — Warthog LAM all modes
Published: 2019-07-09 03:38:25 +0000 UTC; Views: 3627; Favourites: 160; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
Like what I do? 1-2$ a month from you can add up to a lot in helping me be able to continue, and improve.Become a Patreon & helping me defray costs: www.patreon.com/user?u=1975759…
Not ready for commitment? A 1x donation at my Ko-Fi can go a long way! Cheers! ko-fi.com/bishopsbeerfund
Related content
Comments: 31
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Wonderful use of the old Warthog design. Great VTOL design!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
because low speed/high endurance CAS won't be a thing in the future, as depicted by Battletech?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Please don't wake the beast we call Harmony Gold.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
But how much did they "suck" from HBS to go away?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
nothing, actually. PGI gave it to them without any lube. Court Docs are there for you to read, with a simple google search.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Then what was the reason for them to team up with Paradox?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Because Paradox is a Publisher and could allow them to go back to focusing on being a Studio, instead f trying t advertise, and all the jazz that aren't, ya know...designing games?
HBS defaulted from the Lawsuit from go. And PGI caused it to be dismissed with prejudice. All public record. As was HBS's reason for joining up with Paradox (which HBS themselves have addressed, multiple times. Unless... GASP! It's all a conspiracy!).
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Sorry to bother you. I a disabled vet whom played Battletech back in the 90's in highschool. I no longer have the mental faculties I use to and was just looking to understand and not create drama.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Likely not all on you.
I deal as part of my business with the various Btech Community sites. Lots of rumors, misinformation, half truths and outright lies and flat out anti CGL/HBS/PGI agendas. So after a while you either get totally numb to it, or it becomes like a festering thorn in your paw and anything tweaks it, kind of gets a bad reaction
And we have a LOT of bad actors out there who want nothing more than to see PGI fail (cuz MWO is not the game THEY wanted), CGL to fail (because Dark Age, or insert other rant here) or for HBS to fail (cause they're a bunch of lefty commies who dared put non white people in their game! *facepalm*), or all of the above.
So after a while one simply gets tired of it all. The info is out there, but seems very few people are willing to look before making assertions. So when I see an what seems like an unfounded accusation, I'm kind of at the point of shoot first, ask questions later. I'm just thoroughly sick of it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Was just looking for your option on the matter.
Thanks for the help,
Seyla 😊
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
To be honest, and I know HG is the Devil's first cousin, LAMs, at least to me, don't fit the "Walking Tank" nature of BT. Yes, I know they come from way back when FASA used several Macross designs, but to me they are a bit odd within the context of BT.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I agree. It just never fit with the fall of the Star League.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
agree, disagree, it's part of the game. I don't pick and choose which is "real" or not.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Now that is a nice adaptation: and with the RAC/5 it can actually hold its own in a straight up fight: much like a legionnaire.
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
Agreed! I wonder what the armament on it would be game-wise?
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
RAC5 and Bomb Bays. 4/6/4 base move stats. Armored Cockpit Module
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
