HOME | DD

Bobbyperux β€” IdeaLab HP

Published: 2009-11-21 20:32:29 +0000 UTC; Views: 6408; Favourites: 40; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description |About:

Home page design for a client. Rejected version.

|Credits

Header icon is from "Blue Vector Icon Pack".


Β© 2009 Roberto Abril Hidalgo | bobbyperux.deviantart.com | teskostudio.com
Related content
Comments: 29

nuaalee [2010-02-12 15:29:01 +0000 UTC]

how to download it

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Bobbyperux In reply to nuaalee [2010-02-15 14:14:28 +0000 UTC]

hit ALT+F4

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

echo615 [2009-12-22 08:53:19 +0000 UTC]

nice work

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

DouglasEltz [2009-12-07 20:06:57 +0000 UTC]

Don't like the minimal font used in text, but this can be changed, I like the colors and structure, The navegation can be better, The rest is normal, good colors anyways

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Bobbyperux In reply to DouglasEltz [2009-12-08 11:41:13 +0000 UTC]

The only "minimal" font here is the one related to the corporate id from the company, so I guess it can not be changed.

Yeah, I agree, navigation could be better and it is in the accepted version.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DouglasEltz In reply to Bobbyperux [2009-12-08 12:07:55 +0000 UTC]

Yes, The Verdana 9px I guess.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Bobbyperux In reply to DouglasEltz [2009-12-08 17:56:22 +0000 UTC]

Ups weΒ΄re not talking about the same font I believe.

Since Verdana is a web safe/very standard font, I never thought about it as a minimal font. I was talking about the one used in the heading slide and sidebar heading. ThatΒ΄s the corporate font they wanted in their page.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DouglasEltz In reply to Bobbyperux [2009-12-08 20:03:08 +0000 UTC]

Yes. You're right. But you have used Verdana?
Sorry for the error.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Bobbyperux In reply to DouglasEltz [2009-12-09 10:26:28 +0000 UTC]

DonΒ΄t see opinions as errors, everyone has their own point of view on things. Yes I did. Verdana 10px.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DouglasEltz In reply to Bobbyperux [2009-12-09 11:53:21 +0000 UTC]

Verdana. It's personal, I think it's different and a lot of space between letters. But she is very
professional, many people like, it is pretty well implemented. There was talk that is one of the
most used as well. Well, Have a great day

Thanks for chatting.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

kunthi [2009-11-28 01:54:18 +0000 UTC]

Very sleek I like it~

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Gin50 [2009-11-24 19:08:09 +0000 UTC]

All of your designs have such ugly content font, why the f' would you want to use this?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Pulsera In reply to Gin50 [2010-01-08 13:31:01 +0000 UTC]

The question is, why wouldn't you want to use this?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Gin50 In reply to Pulsera [2010-01-13 22:45:08 +0000 UTC]

Because there are much better designers out there who CAN design. I was following this ish for the past years now and I don't see ANY improvements. It just doesn't improves...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Rin-7 [2009-11-22 19:17:12 +0000 UTC]

cool . i love the blue

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

cooldude2222 [2009-11-22 11:56:34 +0000 UTC]

heh, it's amazing!

.K

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

EnzuDes1gn [2009-11-22 11:42:08 +0000 UTC]

Don't really like the navigation tbh, the rest is of your usual quality though

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

OtisBee [2009-11-22 08:33:56 +0000 UTC]

mmh, .. yummy!
usually i'd say i prefer the darker styles, but i guess you just taught me differently.

i love it!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Bobbyperux In reply to OtisBee [2009-11-22 11:05:54 +0000 UTC]

Glad you like it mate. Did you receive my proposal?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

OtisBee In reply to Bobbyperux [2009-11-22 13:53:34 +0000 UTC]

check your mailbox.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Bobbyperux In reply to OtisBee [2009-11-22 17:02:34 +0000 UTC]

Your turn

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

OtisBee In reply to Bobbyperux [2009-11-29 14:17:40 +0000 UTC]

nope, i don't think so.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

nemanjamilo [2009-11-21 22:15:09 +0000 UTC]

rly good work

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Bobbyperux In reply to nemanjamilo [2009-11-22 11:05:05 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

TheSprunk [2009-11-21 21:17:00 +0000 UTC]

Sweet, simple, to the point. Like it

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Bobbyperux In reply to TheSprunk [2009-11-22 11:04:33 +0000 UTC]

Thanks man!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

umar123 [2009-11-21 20:42:28 +0000 UTC]

Nice

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Bobbyperux In reply to umar123 [2009-11-22 11:04:10 +0000 UTC]

hey thanks!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

umar123 In reply to Bobbyperux [2009-11-22 11:08:40 +0000 UTC]

np

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0