HOME | DD

Bogdanbl4 β€” IronGirl Barracuda

Published: 2014-02-13 23:32:10 +0000 UTC; Views: 74221; Favourites: 3271; Downloads: 2020
Redirect to original
Description www.gameartisans.org/forums/th… ...
Related content
Comments: 232

diphis In reply to ??? [2014-02-14 22:11:06 +0000 UTC]

No, it doesn't. It has feminime features that shows the sex of the user.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Breehuynh In reply to diphis [2014-02-14 22:17:09 +0000 UTC]

Yes, it does. If it's a girl why no boobs

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Gillbait In reply to Breehuynh [2014-02-14 22:20:15 +0000 UTC]

Because it's a suit of armour.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

Breehuynh In reply to Gillbait [2014-02-14 22:43:16 +0000 UTC]

Even with armor it should have boobs. It's a guy not girl

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

nakaronii In reply to Breehuynh [2014-02-14 22:45:05 +0000 UTC]

Breast-shaped breastplates are extremely inefficient and would probably end up killing you before actually protecting your chest.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Breehuynh In reply to nakaronii [2014-02-14 22:48:40 +0000 UTC]

And I thought this was supposedly art. Still it should have breast plate

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Breehuynh In reply to Gillbait [2014-02-14 22:29:43 +0000 UTC]

So where is the boobs, it maybe an armor but it still should show boobs

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 3

fifth-horseman In reply to Breehuynh [2015-03-15 16:39:47 +0000 UTC]

It does, you're just missing it because it's not as exaggerated as you're used to seeing.
On the regular Iron Man armor, the front of the chest is a single, mostly flat, plate.
Here, there are two protruding, rounded and slightly pointed plates of armor, looking very much like a pair of breasts.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Breehuynh In reply to fifth-horseman [2015-09-01 19:37:43 +0000 UTC]

Where are the so called "protruding, round and slightly pointed plate" that your talking aboutΒ 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

fifth-horseman In reply to Breehuynh [2016-02-15 10:48:23 +0000 UTC]

Compare the chest of the armor on this picture with the original Iron Man design and it should be obvious. It's pretty damn clear in bogdanbl4.deviantart.com/art/I…

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Breehuynh In reply to fifth-horseman [2016-04-30 16:54:02 +0000 UTC]

nope without breast doesn't make theΒ robot feminine

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Gillbait In reply to Breehuynh [2014-02-15 21:49:24 +0000 UTC]

That's a little mysogonistic.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Breehuynh In reply to Gillbait [2014-02-15 21:57:33 +0000 UTC]

Mysogonistic?, I live in the real world and I don't think magazine would show "girls" with no breast and I don't believe robots to be gender less nor armor

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Gillbait In reply to Breehuynh [2014-02-16 01:33:14 +0000 UTC]

The magazine industry is just as mysogonistic. And as robots are machines....
Let's not continue to argue. You have your views, and I have mine.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Breehuynh In reply to Breehuynh [2014-02-14 22:47:13 +0000 UTC]

It doesn't show "feminine" features all it shows is male features and it's a boy. BOY, BOY,BOY

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Klandestineone In reply to Breehuynh [2014-02-14 23:38:20 +0000 UTC]

......I think you need to study armor design so you'd realize what you're saying is ill-informed.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Breehuynh In reply to Klandestineone [2014-02-15 17:50:47 +0000 UTC]

You need to study armor design, beside I have seen armor design before

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

cocookie In reply to Breehuynh [2014-02-15 18:32:14 +0000 UTC]

You've seen armor designed for sex appeal before goodbye haΒ 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Breehuynh In reply to cocookie [2014-02-15 21:16:19 +0000 UTC]

Yes, I have seen armor design see futurama anime before arguing

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

cocookie In reply to Breehuynh [2014-02-15 22:15:09 +0000 UTC]

Futurama is an American cartoon?? Idk what you hope to game from that.

Ill repeat what I said, you've seen sexualized piece if metal that are more or less bras. See 500 bc- 1600 ad armor before arguing

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Breehuynh In reply to cocookie [2014-02-15 22:19:28 +0000 UTC]

No, it's not more or less bras 500bc is a movie

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

cocookie In reply to Breehuynh [2014-02-16 00:16:04 +0000 UTC]

500 bc is an actual time period on this actual earth. Look back what, were Greeks wearing? Armor!Β 

Look back into history and Joan of arc, a real person, wore armor into battle, it didn't have sockets for her boobs to go into. Joan's armor was flat. The whole origin of the stupid boob plate parade is from the fricking oversexualization of misogynistic artists. Just because an artist decides to back the hell off an overTted and stupid looking design tactic made for sad and sexually frustrated men to gawk at, doesn't mean that it isn't a women. Heck, who are you to even decide what an artist's done? The artist made a point saying it was a female armor design, why are you even argueing that it isn't?Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Breehuynh In reply to cocookie [2014-02-16 01:49:47 +0000 UTC]

Armor design and what are you even arguing since you talk about Joan of arc whose armor had boobs

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

cocookie In reply to Breehuynh [2014-02-16 01:54:10 +0000 UTC]

I'm arguing that you don't need to have tits in your face to show its female, that boobs don't decide gender.

Joan of arc did not have boob armor oh my god. Do you even know who she is?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Breehuynh In reply to cocookie [2014-02-16 02:49:17 +0000 UTC]

Yes, I know who she is yet it seem you think you don't need to have boobs to show it's female

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

cocookie In reply to Breehuynh [2014-02-16 03:01:05 +0000 UTC]

That's exactly what I'm saying.


Why do we have to show boobs for it to be female?


πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Breehuynh In reply to cocookie [2014-02-16 03:05:06 +0000 UTC]

If the female aren't with boobs in the art then it look weird

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

cocookie In reply to Breehuynh [2014-02-16 03:18:53 +0000 UTC]

Why does it look weird?Β 

A woman Β can have boobs and not show them, and that's totally fine~ it's the artists choice and in real life women wouldn't show their boobs in armor because it wouldn't protect them.


So Why does it look weird?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Breehuynh In reply to cocookie [2014-02-16 03:23:51 +0000 UTC]

No, if you said a male bodybuilder who you saw his pecs and said he had boobs they'll look at you strange

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

cocookie In reply to Breehuynh [2014-02-16 03:30:16 +0000 UTC]

Male body builders don't have boobs though I never said that.


That doesn't answer my question:why does it look weird if a woman doesn't show her tits?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Breehuynh In reply to cocookie [2014-02-16 03:34:28 +0000 UTC]

Ah, I never said it look weird if a woman doesn't show her tits, I simply state in the drawing iron girl should be drawn with breast otherwise it look like a boy

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

cocookie In reply to Breehuynh [2014-02-16 03:56:20 +0000 UTC]

Gender is not defined by breasts or lack thereof.Β 

That is a very harmful way of thinking dude.Β 


You don't need boobs to be a girl.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Breehuynh In reply to cocookie [2014-02-16 04:07:30 +0000 UTC]

Really? I don't think so cause I draw a robot with female feature and no boobs. Does it look like boy or girl?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

cocookie In reply to Breehuynh [2014-02-16 08:20:48 +0000 UTC]

Yeh they'd look female that's kinda the point of 'female features' to make them look feminine.

Boobs don't decide gender

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Breehuynh In reply to cocookie [2014-02-16 19:48:55 +0000 UTC]

No, just looking a female doesn't means that female feature make them feminine. Boobs do decide gender even if some say both sexes have them, which it's utterly nonsense

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

cocookie In reply to Breehuynh [2014-02-16 20:48:50 +0000 UTC]

The what if a women gets a mastectomy? Does she she magically stop being a women because she doesn't have boobs anymore?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

Breehuynh In reply to cocookie [2014-03-12 18:31:38 +0000 UTC]

What does that have to do with the art

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

cocookie In reply to Breehuynh [2014-03-12 18:48:00 +0000 UTC]

You know what? I really don't care anymore, if you can't keep up with a discussion then...whatever it's not worth having and honestly I don't want to get upset at your ignorant and stubborn crap anymore. You can't answer basic questions to defend your viewpoints.

and that was referring to your ludicrous and sexist idea that boobs=female

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Breehuynh In reply to cocookie [2014-05-20 21:01:00 +0000 UTC]

No, I'm not sexist since you think female werewolf need breast

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

cocookie In reply to Breehuynh [2014-05-20 23:59:37 +0000 UTC]

I never said anything about werewolves, man.Β 
What are you talking about???Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Breehuynh In reply to cocookie [2014-05-21 15:10:40 +0000 UTC]

I'm talking about when drawing werewolves it's always drawn with breast

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Klandestineone In reply to cocookie [2014-02-19 04:10:19 +0000 UTC]

He doesn't have an answer for that because he's not a logical person....

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

cocookie In reply to Klandestineone [2014-02-19 04:19:22 +0000 UTC]

No. Answer the question. Does a women stop being a woman when she gets a mastectomy? Does she stop being female because she had her breasts removed to save her life?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Klandestineone In reply to Breehuynh [2014-02-15 23:18:36 +0000 UTC]

What the heck are you talking about?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Breehuynh In reply to Klandestineone [2014-02-15 23:58:20 +0000 UTC]

I'm talking about the iron man girl

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

AutumnCzun In reply to ??? [2014-02-14 22:02:20 +0000 UTC]

Very well made!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Wyvern0125 In reply to ??? [2014-02-14 21:57:57 +0000 UTC]

Reminds me of Arcee from Transformers: Prime.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

chris-the-sword In reply to ??? [2014-02-14 21:13:49 +0000 UTC]

good work!
very detailed, complicated, and for some reason....
quite sexy.

do more!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

EgyptianPharaoh82 In reply to ??? [2014-02-14 21:03:59 +0000 UTC]

Niice !!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Marcsampson In reply to ??? [2014-02-14 20:58:48 +0000 UTC]

love it

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0


<= Prev | | Next =>