HOME | DD

Published: 2006-06-18 08:25:35 +0000 UTC; Views: 1860; Favourites: 25; Downloads: 86
Redirect to original
Description
wow, I really like this one.not much to say, Apophysis 2.04b + PS:CS2
c&c encouraged as always
Related content
Comments: 23
ClyMaxx [2008-06-02 14:36:34 +0000 UTC]
That is crazily executed. Well done. The sheer detail is superb. Also, I like the color choice and distribution, very vibrant. Take some work? lol
Funny, you don't seem to mention it, but I know of a certain song of the same name. By DragonForce. XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BordomBeThyName In reply to ClyMaxx [2008-06-02 23:56:35 +0000 UTC]
shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh....
I also never named Romanticide after a Nightwish song, or Vertigo after a U2 song... never happened...
Yeah, I'm really uncreative with names, and lazy with crediting them... heh.
Thanks for the compliments though! you actually can't even see all the detail at this size. The only thing that really took a long time was rendering it though, I made the original huge (6250 x 5000). The rest only took an hour or so.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
ClyMaxx In reply to BordomBeThyName [2008-06-03 00:38:35 +0000 UTC]
Your secret... is safe.
Anyway, great job. I intend to learn the way of super imaging. the song fits, if you wanted to know.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
BordomBeThyName In reply to BordomBeThyName [2008-06-02 23:57:42 +0000 UTC]
oh, Life Less Frightening also definitely isn't named after a Rise Against song...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
DISENT [2007-09-11 14:56:09 +0000 UTC]
Really nice work, I like the crisp detail & flow, it almost looks like a phoenix rising.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BordomBeThyName In reply to DISENT [2007-09-19 03:36:10 +0000 UTC]
I think that would have been a better name...
Thanks though, I always liked this one.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
x-crescentmoon-x [2006-08-27 03:09:31 +0000 UTC]
I love the simple yet complex nature of this.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BordomBeThyName In reply to x-crescentmoon-x [2006-08-27 04:20:39 +0000 UTC]
thanks a lot, but honestly I have yet to find anything simple in it
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
AntiChristLozer [2006-06-22 17:08:19 +0000 UTC]
This is amazing, really it is. I like how big it is, it lets you see every detail that's there. I adore the colors, it genuinly reminds me of fire or something. I really honestly am not sure what you could improve on with this. I have to say, I think you've mastered this type of CS2 art. :]
-Autumn M. Mitchell
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BordomBeThyName In reply to AntiChristLozer [2006-06-22 20:13:30 +0000 UTC]
thanks
actually, its funny, theres like waaaaay more details in the origional, but that was like 3000 x 2250, so it was a bit too big for my tastes.
and the fire thing, yeah, I was going to make it like, super-firey, but I decided against it.
thanks again, glad to know my work is appreciated
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
BordomBeThyName In reply to Kitki [2006-06-18 22:32:42 +0000 UTC]
heh, het yourself bored to the point of insanity, and open photoshop.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
can16358p In reply to BordomBeThyName [2006-06-19 06:20:59 +0000 UTC]
ahahaha
i am bored to the point of insanity,
but i use paint shop pro
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BordomBeThyName In reply to can16358p [2006-06-19 21:38:51 +0000 UTC]
I can hook you up with a copy of CS2, if you want.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
can16358p In reply to BordomBeThyName [2006-06-20 09:36:28 +0000 UTC]
actually i have cs2 installed, but you know, I'm used to paint shop pro for years, and it seems much easir, everything is organized and i find whatever im searching for easily.
im ok with paint shop pro.
(i think photoshop is just like the ipod, just has the name, nothing special)
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
DacManiac [2006-06-18 16:21:40 +0000 UTC]
WOW that is some work there . a very good fractal work ^_^ but i think there should be a little more flow and some of the black spots shoudl be lessened.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BordomBeThyName In reply to DacManiac [2006-06-18 22:32:20 +0000 UTC]
heh, thanks. I thought the flow was pretty good, but I'll try harder next time, and the black spots just kinda show up, I usually render on a black background, so I really cant see them.
thanks for the C&C, lots to work on next time
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
can16358p [2006-06-18 11:42:52 +0000 UTC]
there is A LOT in this.
But why did youmake it near lossless size. 1280x1024 at 1.9MB? it's just a bit too much.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BordomBeThyName In reply to can16358p [2006-06-18 22:30:25 +0000 UTC]
I dunno, I have 600Gb on my computer so I never care much about file sizes...
thanks though
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
can16358p In reply to BordomBeThyName [2006-06-19 06:18:44 +0000 UTC]
wow 600gb! i have one 40g one 120g and they are full, the worst case is i have no empty dvds left, but i'll buy the biggest capacity hdd soon. (whatever there will be when i'm buying)
anyway, 1.9mb is usually no problem with broadband, but people may be downloading files while browsing, and everybody is not broadband, or simply people may not want to wait, or they may want to save the picture but it's too large.
just some several reasons for compression
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BordomBeThyName In reply to can16358p [2006-06-19 21:39:36 +0000 UTC]
alright, I'll lower the size a bit on the next one.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0