HOME | DD
Bread-Crumbz β Wolves and wolfaboos
Published: 2010-06-04 19:06:55 +0000 UTC; Views: 10424; Favourites: 100; Downloads: 85
Redirect to original
Description
Edit 2: oh my god the anatomy on seth isnt good i know its to prove a point, i made this like forever ago, cut me some slack, okay?Edit: Yes I am aware I got wolfaboo and sparkledog confused, don't cut my balls off cuz of it, jeez
If you have trouble reading them, just tell me I'll translate it for you
Related content
Comments: 146
Honestly the "wolf" at the right looks more like a fox.
π: 0 β©: 0
I usually do:
-the emo hair (i cant draw simmetrical eyes),
-the hilarious anatomy (i cant draw decent anatomy),
-the big ears (i love them)
-I usually give them a necklace or leather cuffs to the paws, maybe a scarf
These traits are still bad with a wolf OC?
π: 0 β©: 0
what the hell is a wolfaboo???!!! Someone please just say...
π: 0 β©: 1
An oc that has too much colors,has over 100 accessories, has a back story that doesent make sense, and has emo hair. Hope that helps.
π: 0 β©: 1
what drn1234 said, yes. but there is way way more about "them" and it's insane and bad...just bad..
π: 0 β©: 0
foxes don't even look like that
π: 0 β©: 1
True, but it looks more like a fox than a wolf.
π: 0 β©: 0
I don't think the character matters as much as the person's point of view. Even if they had a "wolf" character similar to the one on the left, they could still have wolfaboo opinions.Β
π: 0 β©: 0
sooo... if someone have a little colorfull wolf but it dont have all these details.... it means that she/he is a wolfaboo too ?
π: 0 β©: 1
no, not really. an oc is an oc. if your a wolfaboo you think people are idiots, think you Are a wolf or a wolf soul in a human body, know nothing about why farmers kill them(to save there animals) and so on.
π: 0 β©: 0
I don't think the style of it honestly matters, its mostly the colors and how the mane turns out. .3.
π: 0 β©: 0
So if I still don't know how to draw anatomy, and draw one of my characters with huge paws and ears and the wrong anatomy, that makes them a sparklewolf?Β
I agree with the rest though
π: 0 β©: 0
A wolfaboo is a person. I think that rainbow wolf is actually a sparkle dog
π: 0 β©: 0
every one calm down ok its there opinion ok you might have a sparkle dog oc but the point of this is most Wolfaboos have a oc like this but if you do itΒ does not make you one but be respectful ok how would you feel when you finally post your opinion and people bash you ok just be nice to others ok
π: 0 β©: 0
So wait,you can just judge whether a person wolfaboo or not by simply looking at their wolf character? That's too general.
Fine,I'm a wolfaboo for simply having odd wolf character that is a sparkle dog.WAT?Β
π: 0 β©: 0
Really now? People who like to draw different styles or species of wolves are bad now?
Also, there is no such thing as a "normal" looking wolf when it comes to being creative and creating one.
It's like judging mickey mouse for wearing clothes, is giant, and talks, and looks different a little, because he looked nothing like a mouse in this boring world. lol
π: 0 β©: 1
It's a bit peculiar to call such a thing a species of wolf, since technically it's not. Sure, creativity is very important when making a character and that is what pulls people in, but blinding colors, over-used accessories, etc, is NOT being creative or original. It's just annoying, and not only that, but most of the time people create these characters based on other characters.
By the way, I'm pretty sure there's a difference between "style" and "I'm too lazy to try to get this right"
P.S. Looks are not everything when making a character.
π: 0 β©: 1
"but blinding colors, over-used accessories, etc, is NOT being creative or original." "It's just annoying, and not only that, but most of the time people create these characters based on other characters."
There is no such thing as originality. Everything we draw already, especially the idea of making a random wolf character is already "used" a lot. And EVERYTHING is based on other ideas, fan or not. I think it's kind of terrible to pretend doing things like that has nothing to do with creative. Creativity is about combining stuff and culture is about RE-Using stuff to make your own (Or even not), even if the result ended up the same.
And honestly, it is a new style and animal, no matter what looks, it can still be it's own thing, wither you think it's bad or not. You wouldn't like it if people judge you for making a non-rainbow version of wolves, it's the same kind of thing honestly.
Plus, no one has the right to judge what other people think is creative in there own personal way honesty. But yeah, "Sparkle-Wolves" is not anything different than making "Flying-horses". It's based on things like how ponies or whatever is.
π: 0 β©: 2
That's how you avoid plagiarizing.
π: 0 β©: 0
Honestly, I really wouldn't care. Like. At all.
π: 0 β©: 1
Well if your the guy who made this, it looks like you do care. Guess I would not care if I wanted to post a thing saying "no-wolf vs wolf-characters". Since no-originality vs no-originality is the same thing.
π: 0 β©: 1
Not that I care, I just wanted to throw my opinion out there. And I really don't know what you mean. I wouldn't care if you did that.
π: 0 β©: 1
Well I argued because you argued with me about the idea of "not-original" so I wanted to address the science about that back, with comparison, etc. lol
π: 0 β©: 1
It's kinda of an opinion whether I find it original or not. No science about that.
π: 0 β©: 1
It's not an opinion to say we have done this all the time, it's kind of proven, especially that opinion can be argued (I learned this from a really excellent person and others who studied about culture. This type of opinion though isn't even much necessary and may effect the culture for more crap, even though I'm not forcing the guy to like Sparkle Wolves as it's fine to not. Those types of things often can't be argued besides a harmless offer or whatever.
π: 0 β©: 1
THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH CULTURE WE'RE TALKING ABOUT SPARKLE WOLVES ;U;
π: 0 β©: 1
Well it does, like vampires, werewolves, etc..
I probably should of used "sub-culture" or something instead. Culture is more of a deeeep history thing I think.
However, it's part of a culture or main sub-culture I.E. Art style of creatures.
π: 0 β©: 1
Um. No. Just consider it a thing that people do to make others eyesore and leave it at that.
π: 0 β©: 1
Sorry, well no, not sorry but that's how it works, whether you like it or not, it's the same thing.
Your disliked opinion about it doesn't change that fact. It happens to be a kind of gen, just like every other thing based on a interest, proving the theory.
If you don't like that part Sub-culture or whatever culture, then leave it alone and move on to your own thing. Get over it.
π: 0 β©: 1
Seriously. I dropped this conversation a long time. Can I just call it what I want, and leave it at that?
See ya.
π: 0 β©: 1
Dropped it? You replied... oh wait I remember being long offline but your reply was still waiting so I wanted to reply.
When it comes to the public, people has rights to argue about it, since this was an offensive post lacking of understanding on how a world-moment thing works.
It's like going to the public and saying "George Bush" is still president as an example. I would suggest if one doesn't like it, move on and stop complaining..
See ya.
π: 0 β©: 1
I don't believe it applies to sparkle wolves.
π: 0 β©: 1
No matter how some people think about them, it scientifically does.
I would be personality piss off if people spread that "Angry birds" fandom by making OCs based off them much further, but I won't go out there and make up lies about culture and pretend it's "special", nor would I feel the "need" to spread hatred about it just because I hate it or something.
Because of the fact that I'm not forced to like it, the "need" to is unnecessary. Otherwise, it would be bigoted, hatred, narrow-minded, etc.
π: 0 β©: 1
That's what happens when you post offensive crap in the first place.
-Truth
The End.
π: 0 β©: 1
Sorry I offended you because I don't like colorful dogs.
π: 0 β©: 1
There is a fine difference between personality disliking colorful "dogs" and the "need" to express it out there, and how.
It's not offensive for you to not like something it's self. Even if you personality replied saying "no" if someone asked.
But beyond that crosses that one line.
π: 0 β©: 1
I'm confused. Do you mean 'personally?'
Personality is the particular combination of emotional, attitudinal, and behavioral response patterns of an individual.
That doesn't really seem relevant.
π: 0 β©: 1
I think what you said in black (First part) is what I meant, as it sounds like what I'm talking about.
You dislike something based on your own personal interest or dislikes. Part of what, or how you grew up with I think.
Then I difference that by separating a personal dislike from a trollish way of the "need" to express it, in a way that now crosses the line (Now considered hatred and untrue statements), where on the other side, lies argument sets, etc. Where at first: It's OK to personality not like something.
In other words: It's fine to dislike people being gay it's self I think, but not OK to go out and put signs up against them in public. That's just an example.
π: 0 β©: 1
no bro you can't use it like that
I'm sorta skimming overy our stuff because it
you can't "you're personality too stupid" (just an example)
You have to use personally I don't understand what you're trying to accomplishΒ
π: 0 β©: 1
If my point of explaining matches with it's meaning, or optionally close, I think I can. I also looked at both meanings but they both nearly look the same. I still need to look at it though sometime.
And I don't know why your taking that too seriously, I think something is up... lol
Anyway my point is... It's OK to dislike something based on your own personal experience, I.E. simply not into it.
Then there is that line with arguments that isn't necessary or true, and can be argued. Example, world-view thoughts such as: I think 2+2=5 and publishing that.
Very simple.
I already gave out the "anti-homosexuality" example too.
π: 0 β©: 0
Someone who is so Crazily obsessed with Wolves that they value them more than Humans, Make Sparkledogs, Say that they're a wolf, and Value Wolves like they're god
π: 0 β©: 0
LOL at the wolfaboo drawing! That is so true!
π: 0 β©: 0
| Next =>