HOME | DD

Description
People in need of expressions: I'M HERE!

For the people that have mad scientists for characters and don't know how to draw their excitement in their work, these are the reference shots for you! Whether you have a mad, evil, German, Russian, Swedish, or Polish scientist/engineer/goggle-maniac with crazy hair--you need me! Mwahahahahahaaa!!!

So this is my fried out of my mind from working on my paper for Constitutional Law (yeah...I know...blegh). Thought I'd unwind with my pathetic attempt at snapping craziness from my iMac's webcam.

Hope I helped in some way!

FYI, some of these expressions are taken from my sketches (oh yeah, that's right--I work backwards, baby), so they may look familiar if you look at this [link] . All I ask is that you DO NOT take my characters. Faces, yes, characters, NEIN!!!

EDIT: Someone decided to deem this inappropriate for the category I put it in...then one of the "helpers" of this site deemed them logical in their reasoning. Their reasoning is purely subjective. So I've decided to add MY CORRECT reasoning into why it's (rather, WAS) in this specific category:

(1) According to the "gallery info" to explain the categories says I am correct.
(a) "Classic portrait images and images that do not display the model's full body but include the majority of the model's face."
- It's my face with my expressions in almost 70% of the photo. Majority rules.
(b) "Stock Photography which the provider has granted a licence for incorporation into other Deviant artists work."
- it may not be high res for you "photo-manip artists" but it's under "Resource and Stock" --resource is another word for reference.

(2) Model & Female sub-category: self-explanatory unless you think otherwise of my gender.

(3) It should be my decision on which category my work goes to. It's my money. The website should respect that and deem my logic sound. Not my spectators.

(4) If there was a "cheap reference" category I'd put my crap there in a heartbeat. But I believe it's up to me to decide whether it's crap. It's free so I'm not selling it to die-hard art buyers.

Cheers.

PS: I do not consider this Photography in the slightest. Webcam = poor quality. They're shots of my face. Not art involved.

Description
People in need of expressions: I'M HERE!

For the people that have mad scientists for characters and don't know how to draw their excitement in their work, these are the reference shots for you! Whether you have a mad, evil, German, Russian, Swedish, or Polish scientist/engineer/goggle-maniac with crazy hair--you need me! Mwahahahahahaaa!!!

So this is my fried out of my mind from working on my paper for Constitutional Law (yeah...I know...blegh). Thought I'd unwind with my pathetic attempt at snapping craziness from my iMac's webcam.

Hope I helped in some way!

FYI, some of these expressions are taken from my sketches (oh yeah, that's right--I work backwards, baby), so they may look familiar if you look at this [link] . All I ask is that you DO NOT take my characters. Faces, yes, characters, NEIN!!!

EDIT: Someone decided to deem this inappropriate for the category I put it in...then one of the "helpers" of this site deemed them logical in their reasoning. Their reasoning is purely subjective. So I've decided to add MY CORRECT reasoning into why it's (rather, WAS) in this specific category:

(1) According to the "gallery info" to explain the categories says I am correct.
(a) "Classic portrait images and images that do not display the model's full body but include the majority of the model's face."
- It's my face with my expressions in almost 70% of the photo. Majority rules.
(b) "Stock Photography which the provider has granted a licence for incorporation into other Deviant artists work."
- it may not be high res for you "photo-manip artists" but it's under "Resource and Stock" --resource is another word for reference.

(2) Model & Female sub-category: self-explanatory unless you think otherwise of my gender.

(3) It should be my decision on which category my work goes to. It's my money. The website should respect that and deem my logic sound. Not my spectators.

(4) If there was a "cheap reference" category I'd put my crap there in a heartbeat. But I believe it's up to me to decide whether it's crap. It's free so I'm not selling it to die-hard art buyers.

Cheers.

PS: I do not consider this Photography in the slightest. Webcam = poor quality. They're shots of my face. Not art involved.