HOME | DD

Published: 2007-01-03 19:23:02 +0000 UTC; Views: 5935; Favourites: 106; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
......... mononykus at a termitemound.Related content
Comments: 16
Namerak [2012-12-26 06:24:51 +0000 UTC]
I like it. It's interesting to see mononykus depicted as fulfilling a role similar to an anteater.
π: 0 β©: 0
wjbooks [2012-10-29 16:12:18 +0000 UTC]
I'd like to use this image for our book about dinosaurs. Could you please kindly guide me how to proceed it? Or, could you let me know your direct email address? Plz let me know your e-mail.
π: 0 β©: 0
Musquash [2008-02-26 03:34:41 +0000 UTC]
Mononykus is a weird dinosaur with it's stubby arms. Nice job!
π: 0 β©: 0
LegendaryD [2007-02-04 02:30:51 +0000 UTC]
Oh yes Mononychus! A Mongolian bird-like dinosaur.
π: 0 β©: 0
aspidel [2007-01-06 10:40:25 +0000 UTC]
Very cool, schmick piece.
You should take a Dinosauricon account: [link]
+ fav
π: 0 β©: 1
Calisius In reply to aspidel [2007-01-06 11:27:00 +0000 UTC]
i have tryed twice. no answer. maybe you can help me?
π: 0 β©: 2
aspidel In reply to Calisius [2007-01-06 11:57:02 +0000 UTC]
Oh well, I think Mike Keesey is too busy. Better waiting then, I hope he'll be able to have a review system soon.
π: 0 β©: 0
Calisius In reply to Calisius [2007-01-06 11:53:35 +0000 UTC]
because of become a member od the dinosauricon gallery.
π: 0 β©: 0
EmperorDinobot [2007-01-05 06:50:35 +0000 UTC]
I think its cute.
Excellent work. I must add it to my favorites!
π: 0 β©: 0
Paleontologia [2007-01-04 03:00:33 +0000 UTC]
Just a suggestion: try to do the arms and claws a little smaller. They look a little large for me. The rest is simply perfect!
π: 0 β©: 1
Calisius In reply to Paleontologia [2007-01-04 07:03:11 +0000 UTC]
maybe you are right. look now. (but dont forget the possibility of sexual dimorphism.
π: 0 β©: 1
Vrenschen [2007-01-03 21:01:45 +0000 UTC]
das ist wirklich sΓΌΓ geworden... wobei ich den brΓΌtenden immer noch am besten finde, weil die federn da so klasse sind. gute zusammensetzung!... dieser hier und der vorige erscheinen mir allerdings unwirklicher als der brΓΌtende. kann mir die namen einfach nicht merken hoffe, das hilft trotzdem?
π: 0 β©: 0