HOME | DD

Calisius β€” nanotyrannus skeletal.rec

Published: 2007-02-15 22:37:22 +0000 UTC; Views: 7397; Favourites: 108; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description ... reconstruction based on nanotyrannus skull and tyrannosaur skeletons.
Related content
Comments: 15

ThePokeSaurus [2022-08-28 16:29:59 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Jdailey1991 [2015-08-28 15:48:04 +0000 UTC]

There was a CAT scan on the head, and the brain is shaped differently from Tyrannosaurus'.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

MommaCabbit [2014-02-06 02:49:50 +0000 UTC]

I used this as a reference!

mommacabbit.deviantart.com/art…

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Boverisuchus [2011-01-15 11:15:33 +0000 UTC]

Consensus seems to be shifting on this guy.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

queenofthedinos [2008-11-08 19:51:17 +0000 UTC]

THANK YOU!


I've been looking for one!
Great job!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

TarryAGoat [2007-03-01 05:33:18 +0000 UTC]

Skull seems a bit long in proportion to the body, but I assume you've looked at skull-body ratios in other tyrannosaurs, right?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Calisius In reply to TarryAGoat [2007-03-03 22:17:29 +0000 UTC]

yes thats right, because of the complete bodyproportion the skull has to be in my opinion a little bigger. if he was an active hunter ,it would be better for him to posses a big mouth to catch his prey.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

TarryAGoat In reply to Calisius [2007-03-04 15:29:19 +0000 UTC]

Gottcha.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

TheOtherEarth [2007-02-16 08:55:59 +0000 UTC]

YaY!Nanotyrannus! this is my 2nd fav dino! great job!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

WaylonRowley [2007-02-16 05:45:19 +0000 UTC]

Very well done. It looks like something I'd come across in a Greg Paul book. Professional grade. I don't know which paleontologist ceb-luv is refering to (Holtz? Carr?), but there is still mixed opinion on whether Nanotyrannus is a valid taxon, or merely a juvi T. rex. Witmer presented some scans of the Nanotyrannus braincase at the 2005 SVP meeting that showed the sinuses around the braincase (among other things) differed quite a bit from those in T. rex. These same scans were featured in a TV program on the science channel devoted to the discovery of Jane the subadult/juvenile T. rex. In his opinion (which carries a LOT of weight in the paleo community, due to the fact that he is The Man) the differences were too great to be a product of ontogeny alone. So, the matter is still up in the air. Not that ceb-luv was implying otherwise.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

FiliusTonitrui In reply to WaylonRowley [2016-03-02 21:29:38 +0000 UTC]

There are far more differences that opoose Carr's fallacious statement.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Calisius In reply to WaylonRowley [2007-02-16 08:04:47 +0000 UTC]

thank you for this comment. we will know it after the excavation of the first complete skeleton.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ceb-luv-lotr [2007-02-16 03:55:06 +0000 UTC]

Cool. Hey guess what? My advisor doesn't think that Nanotyrannus is real. He believes that Nanotyrannus is infact juvenile Tyrannosaurs. And he's a theropod paleontologist so this is what he spends his life studying. I donno, I'm more interested in Sauropods than Theropods, just saying what he's been telling me. Ok, that's it. That's my little soap box.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Calisius In reply to ceb-luv-lotr [2007-02-16 08:00:41 +0000 UTC]

i know that theory. maybe it is right. the most important thing for me was to create a body to this beautyful shaped skull for me a killerface!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

LegendaryD [2007-02-15 22:58:24 +0000 UTC]

COOL! I know him!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0