HOME | DD

cariadav — Roses are red II

Published: 2004-09-16 20:43:54 +0000 UTC; Views: 253; Favourites: 3; Downloads: 48
Redirect to original
Description An improvement on [link] (roses are red...) the background got cleared up and the stalk and leaves were coloured. This took a hell of a lot of time, but I think its worth it. Thanks very kindly to *john-pecko for all the helpful comments on this, and to ~JennyB who advised me to start it as a new deviation... and who stopped me from giving up with it by making me laugh and such. possibly. the background is better on this version, although slightly more blurred and the rose is a bit more blurred as well (the edges). Not entirely sure why, but meh. took long enough as it is. I apologise for it possibly being dark by the way, its entirely possible that my screen brightness is brighter than most peoples.
Related content
Comments: 28

loysheker [2011-09-29 16:42:05 +0000 UTC]

Hello...I was wondering if I could use this image in one of my articles in my blog [link]
I would give you the credit and label the image to your link and name.
Please let me know. Thanks.
loy

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

cariadav In reply to loysheker [2011-11-03 18:30:17 +0000 UTC]

Sorry about the late reply, but sure! Thanks for asking!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

vejjron [2004-10-15 16:03:11 +0000 UTC]

quite used idea here on DA but the red color is wonderful!!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

cariadav In reply to vejjron [2004-10-15 16:39:23 +0000 UTC]

yeah, the idea is pretty popular - maybe because it ca look effective? thank you about the red, I wasnt sure, because some people hhave said it was too dark and stuff...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

triptychr [2004-09-18 16:08:24 +0000 UTC]

Quite striking.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

cariadav In reply to triptychr [2004-09-18 16:24:33 +0000 UTC]

thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ellyvdp [2004-09-17 15:53:13 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

cariadav In reply to ellyvdp [2004-09-17 15:57:24 +0000 UTC]

etc... thank you muchly Elly, Im really glad you liked it

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

AdamART [2004-09-17 09:41:52 +0000 UTC]

With pleasure look compositions done in this manner. Beautiful is output this of flower from greyness.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

cariadav In reply to AdamART [2004-09-17 15:45:29 +0000 UTC]

thank you so much

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

john-pecko [2004-09-16 22:33:16 +0000 UTC]

Oh, yeah... That's what it needed. Great work, this is much better! An example of how taking your time truly makes a difference. November Rain all over again.
Keep it up, mate...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

cariadav In reply to john-pecko [2004-09-17 23:03:16 +0000 UTC]

thanks... its all down to you really - and your suggestions... thanks very much

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

sodium-pentathol [2004-09-16 21:34:57 +0000 UTC]

Oh, i like it... its got a lovely overacting technicolour 1950s style to it...
I can just imagine Ingrid Bergman walking onto the scene and throwing a hissy fit...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

cariadav In reply to sodium-pentathol [2004-09-17 23:29:27 +0000 UTC]

hehe.. Ingrid Bergman in a rose? thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

sodium-pentathol In reply to cariadav [2004-09-18 15:27:55 +0000 UTC]

obviously, she'd have to be quite small, or there would have to be a zoom out effect going on, but still... i stand by the comment...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

cariadav In reply to sodium-pentathol [2004-09-18 15:58:38 +0000 UTC]

hehe... thanksies I guess a zoom out is possible... sell it to some complany for muchos money and you're set

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TheLordOfTheDead [2004-09-16 21:17:10 +0000 UTC]

Well done. The rose stands out well. I like it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

cariadav In reply to TheLordOfTheDead [2004-09-17 23:49:02 +0000 UTC]

thanksies Davyddddddd mister

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

QuoiQueCeSoit [2004-09-16 20:52:50 +0000 UTC]

wow! that is so cool how u seperated b& w and the color - the red and green are so pretty - great job!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

cariadav In reply to QuoiQueCeSoit [2004-09-16 21:04:42 +0000 UTC]

thank you it took a lot of work... Im really pleased with how it came out

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

QuoiQueCeSoit In reply to cariadav [2004-09-16 21:11:02 +0000 UTC]

as well you should be!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

JennyB [2004-09-16 20:50:01 +0000 UTC]

Wow, this is beautiful. I didn't think the first could really get any better, to be honest, but you've proved me wrong. Definitely well worth the evening spent on it

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

john-pecko In reply to JennyB [2004-09-16 22:35:12 +0000 UTC]

Oh, ye of little faith!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JennyB In reply to john-pecko [2004-09-17 11:19:57 +0000 UTC]

I apologise

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

john-pecko In reply to JennyB [2004-09-17 13:27:16 +0000 UTC]

LOL! Come on...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JennyB In reply to john-pecko [2004-09-17 15:07:14 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

cariadav In reply to JennyB [2004-09-16 20:53:53 +0000 UTC]

thank you so much Jenny.. its such a nice comment X lots and lots

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JennyB In reply to cariadav [2004-09-16 20:56:33 +0000 UTC]

No problem at all

👍: 0 ⏩: 0