HOME | DD

cheeeeepCobwebs

Published: 2008-07-16 13:31:16 +0000 UTC; Views: 10004; Favourites: 385; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description ... of the 21st century, that is.
Le Louvre, France.
Related content
Comments: 60

ScribalWriter [2010-02-06 02:07:55 +0000 UTC]

Oh, those lines are phenomenal. Gorgeous piece!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

retro2k [2010-01-31 17:39:42 +0000 UTC]

Hi, your beautiful work is featured in my journal here

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

PLHughes [2009-01-14 12:36:10 +0000 UTC]

featured: [link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

steel-fang [2009-01-02 00:18:34 +0000 UTC]

Nice approach, very interesting shot

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

perception-obscure [2009-01-01 09:53:29 +0000 UTC]

Your delicious abstract is featured here >> [link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

miluki [2008-10-03 17:50:33 +0000 UTC]

I featured this great work : [link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

HuseyinKaRa [2008-08-18 03:40:46 +0000 UTC]

My 'JournalET'

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MtWstock [2008-08-09 06:26:57 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Killearnith [2008-08-09 05:54:25 +0000 UTC]

Fantastic shot

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

EriDaiho [2008-08-09 03:22:34 +0000 UTC]

oh my! looks so beautiful o.O

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

muffinmonkey [2008-08-09 02:12:34 +0000 UTC]

An imperfect picture of a perfect structure

How perfect

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

cheeeeep In reply to muffinmonkey [2008-08-09 02:20:07 +0000 UTC]

Perfect description

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ivanabalabanova [2008-08-09 00:01:02 +0000 UTC]

gr8 gr8 gr8 shot!
Good work

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

artweller24 [2008-08-08 23:38:55 +0000 UTC]

Really cute picture

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

RevivalPhoenix [2008-08-08 22:32:57 +0000 UTC]

Beautiful! I could stare at it for hours! :drools:

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

i-am-creasy [2008-08-08 20:14:03 +0000 UTC]

simply...awesome..thanks.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

m-lucia [2008-08-08 19:48:57 +0000 UTC]

Amazing graphic effect!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Xbxg32000 [2008-08-08 19:13:49 +0000 UTC]

I used to make abstract art digitally before. It's very nice to see abstract art being portrayed in real life--through architecture. This piece truly brings out the best in abstract (or at least in the images' perspective) architecture. Wonderful work.

-gl hf
~Xbx

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

cheeeeep In reply to Xbxg32000 [2008-08-08 23:42:52 +0000 UTC]

Like fractals?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

macsekov [2008-08-08 18:35:01 +0000 UTC]

nice work.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

VertexBase [2008-08-08 18:18:36 +0000 UTC]

great shot!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Monseo [2008-08-08 18:01:17 +0000 UTC]

I like the geometric pattern and how the light emenates from the middle

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

junetown [2008-08-08 17:49:58 +0000 UTC]

i don't know much about photography or actual art terminology, however i will add my unprofessional opinion lol ..

its hard not to take a beautiful shot of le louvre, after all - it's a work of art in itself. but the way you've done it has truly brought out the brilliance.

choosing not to pick a perfect center was smart. throwing in asymmetry to an symmetrical system really paid off, because you added more dimension. the colors tones are perfect. they are not overly focused on a bright beautiful blue sky (would take away from the concept IMO) and at the same time adding perfect contrast to the subject.

really a great piece.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

cheeeeep In reply to junetown [2008-08-08 17:59:48 +0000 UTC]

Haha I don't know much about photography either, nor the terms associated with it, but I agree: The Louvre is so special that whatever you take from it turns out beautifully.

Bright skies make no homes for mechanical spiders. Thanks for pointing out the symmetrical paradox

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

melril [2008-08-08 16:59:37 +0000 UTC]

I recognised your shot in the front page.... so wow, congrats on your DD my friend

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

cheeeeep In reply to melril [2008-08-08 18:01:32 +0000 UTC]

I'm embarrassed ^__^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

melril In reply to cheeeeep [2008-08-08 18:35:15 +0000 UTC]

well personally I dont really like this picture of yours,(this is why i hadnt faved it) but you and a big amount of your work truly deserves a DD SO. KEEP GOING

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Agouti [2008-08-08 16:14:36 +0000 UTC]

<3

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

nixontech2071 [2008-08-08 15:59:34 +0000 UTC]

I love it!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ProfessorNuclio [2008-08-08 15:50:43 +0000 UTC]

Interesting shot. Is that the indide of the big pyramid or the small one? The shadows make it tricky to tell. It looks like an Escher drawing.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

cheeeeep In reply to ProfessorNuclio [2008-08-08 18:00:42 +0000 UTC]

Hm ... I actually can't remember. There are 3 pyramids aren't there?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Ducks-own [2008-08-08 15:24:04 +0000 UTC]

I love the pyramids at the Louvre! I have a few shots of them in my gallery.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

cheeeeep In reply to Ducks-own [2008-08-08 18:11:07 +0000 UTC]

I saw! I love the inverted-x-negative-space-one.
Nice capture/perspective

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Ducks-own In reply to cheeeeep [2008-08-09 13:33:27 +0000 UTC]

I would say thanks, but I'm unfamiliar with that kind of terminology

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

HerrFugbaum [2008-08-08 13:22:04 +0000 UTC]

great job!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

mctrent [2008-08-08 11:52:51 +0000 UTC]

Fantastic shot! Well done!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

experimentalSushi [2008-08-08 11:40:47 +0000 UTC]

great, really. here is my version : [link]


; )

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

cheeeeep In reply to experimentalSushi [2008-08-08 18:08:07 +0000 UTC]

I saw! You have a different perspective on it.
I love gray skies ...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

experimentalSushi In reply to cheeeeep [2008-08-08 19:18:42 +0000 UTC]

me too : )
I like your version better, the format and the clouds make it special. congrats to your dd

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

aspenx [2008-08-08 11:34:20 +0000 UTC]

strangely compelling.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

thomasa [2008-08-08 09:56:39 +0000 UTC]

took mine 2 days earlier

[link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

cheeeeep In reply to thomasa [2008-08-08 18:09:10 +0000 UTC]

Hah - we could've run into each other, unknowingly.
Clean, beautiful blue.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Jurik [2008-08-08 07:32:43 +0000 UTC]

excuse me...which is your geometric study? there is no simmetry, no light games, no patterns....i don't understand...

thnx a lot for your answer. ^__^

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

CHICAGO-lollie In reply to Jurik [2008-08-08 07:48:28 +0000 UTC]

The photographer didn't say anything about geometric study, so you'd have better luck getting that answer from ^opioid .


But it's there. Look for the perspective, rather than the content.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Jurik In reply to CHICAGO-lollie [2008-08-08 18:44:04 +0000 UTC]

my question was direct to the artist, thank a lot for your intervention.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CHICAGO-lollie In reply to Jurik [2008-08-08 22:37:51 +0000 UTC]

Nooo problem, bubblybub. C:

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

cheeeeep In reply to Jurik [2008-08-08 07:37:01 +0000 UTC]

You mean why I did not follow conventional placement? I like asymmetry; not all cobwebs you find in nature are perfectly symmetrical, and neither are man-made ones.

Besides - many would pick a perfect center. I'm sure there are many with a perfect center.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Jurik In reply to cheeeeep [2008-08-08 18:41:11 +0000 UTC]

i'm sorry...i'm not against your art and your personal interpretation...i'm just trying to understand DD that recently seems to come without a concrete reason..
i repeat...i'm happy for you, nothing against, just asking myself some things.... ^___^

thanx for your answer.
bye

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

zJoriz [2008-08-08 07:15:18 +0000 UTC]

Where any other photographer would go for a symmetrical shot, you went for a decentralised one. Awesome! Really an interesting capture.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

cheeeeep In reply to zJoriz [2008-08-08 07:32:27 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0


| Next =>