HOME | DD

Published: 2005-11-13 17:23:54 +0000 UTC; Views: 546; Favourites: 0; Downloads: 196
Redirect to original
Description
inauspicious beta 2 (Formerly vitreolus 1.0)**Update**
The main (not auxillary) console is now 98% fully alpha transparent-
it should blend nicely with any wallpaper in use.
It will also use more CPU resources...but you can always use
the previous version if you are worried about that.
The systray scroll button is no longer available.
You can still scroll through the icons using the mouse wheel,
but the systray will automatically expand when the mouse enters the area,
so unless you have a gazillion tray icons, you shouldn't need to scroll.
**Warning** This theme is not for those with poor eyesight
The main console consists of a taskbar, clock, and systray. Thats it.
By clicking on various bits of the console you can access these options:
-Media Controls: Left-Click on the button with musical notes
-System Stats: Left-Click on the button with the Omega [and get out your magnifying glass]
-Virtual Window Manager: Left-Click on the far left hand side of the console
-Quick Launch Panel - Left-Click on the far right hand side of the console
Most of the theme should work, but there are things I'm still working on, like:
-Getting alphafaded labels in sync.
-OnTop/NotOnTop frustrations
-SysStats Dialog...not terribly happy w/ it right now.
-Moveable/hidable console
Related content
Comments: 5
Thaltos [2005-11-13 19:38:57 +0000 UTC]
Good update. I think the popup looks a lot better now.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
OvejaNegra [2005-11-13 18:21:05 +0000 UTC]
Very niceeee. I love LiteStep, although last time I used it, it was like... hmmm 4 years ago
What "distro" are you using? and do you know if its issues with WindowBlinds are present in new versions?
Anyways, I like your theme, is very minimalistic
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ColdWind In reply to OvejaNegra [2005-11-13 21:58:10 +0000 UTC]
Thanks!
I think I'm still using 24.7 - which has been virtualy free of problems for me. I don't use window blinds, but I think I remember hearing the problem had been fixed a while back. If it hasn't been fixed, it may soon be in the versions now being developed. Check out lsdev.org
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
OvejaNegra In reply to ColdWind [2005-11-14 03:50:36 +0000 UTC]
Thanks for you answer, ColdWind. I'll be checking lsdev.org
👍: 0 ⏩: 0