HOME | DD

crumblygumbly — DeviantDead: Round 2 Page 1

Published: 2010-01-21 02:33:30 +0000 UTC; Views: 4263; Favourites: 44; Downloads: 43
Redirect to original
Description Oho...what's this? It appears to be a page!

Oh look, gutters. I think I liked my other, non-guttery page-layout slightly better if only because I get to use the entire page when I draw it, but this also works. Reminds me of my Wind Riders days anyway XD

The Ned speech in the beginning her used to be longer but I had to chop some bits out. There was a bit more explication and observation regarding the New Tribe and some of the people he bumped into, but this is more to the point, though you get less Ned smart talk XD

OR DO YOU?

Anyway, page 2 being sketched right now. *flails*

Ned (c) Me
Birdie (c)

NextPage: [link]
Related content
Comments: 33

CostumesbyCourtney [2010-01-30 02:37:22 +0000 UTC]

Plague doctor? Cool.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Zanyathedemon [2010-01-21 12:32:17 +0000 UTC]

...youll never stop to make me 'oooooh the backgrounds!!!'
i got obsessed over birdie's bubble, when he says 'it' and 'i'
its the same letter

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

rubberbend [2010-01-21 11:17:12 +0000 UTC]

This is boss. So boss.

Do you think it would look better if Birdie's words were in inverted black and white? ^_^

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

kennybox [2010-01-21 09:51:08 +0000 UTC]

Not that he remembers any new people anyway.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

crumblygumbly In reply to kennybox [2010-01-21 16:38:41 +0000 UTC]

Sure he does. Just not when you push him into a traumatic experience, while at the same time asserting yourself to be remembered by someone whose memory circuits are partially shorted.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

perfect-tea [2010-01-21 08:26:11 +0000 UTC]

Oh yes, Dr Bird Man, a hobo that no one will miss is a perfect target. >(
RUN NED. RUN NOW PLEASE.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

HotRod-302 [2010-01-21 05:58:21 +0000 UTC]

Ya know, kinda makes me think of a show I watched a bit of. Apocolypse Man, it's an education ting about how to survive like this. Only... he doesn't have zombies...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Silvre [2010-01-21 04:47:02 +0000 UTC]

Whoa, it's a plague doctor. Wild.

...you better leave Ned alone, mister!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

AngeliqueAlene [2010-01-21 04:46:30 +0000 UTC]

When you start flailing over your next page spend a little extra time flailing over your backgrounds, I don't want you dropped from the tourney over something as preventable as a plain background.
Other than that, I look forward to the next page.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

crumblygumbly In reply to AngeliqueAlene [2010-01-21 04:57:01 +0000 UTC]

Well, there's not much backgrounds to put in so far (and with the panels not much space for them on this page), and I'm opting for simplification even so. It's a definite improvement from my last round, which was made primarily out of talking heads in the latter half, which is what the judges had critiqued me on--zooming out of the character close ups and giving the backgrounds (even if they're simplified) room to breathe. Though I'm not sure whether you're criticizing the lack of backgrounds or the simplification of them.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AngeliqueAlene In reply to crumblygumbly [2010-01-22 06:09:06 +0000 UTC]

I do believe my comment was about the simplification process of said backgrounds... Though giving breathing room sounds rather appealing, and I can understand the judges' standpoint about that. A simple background is better than no background and whatnot.
I'm not trying to come off as offensive, I just didn't want you skimping out on them, and paying them no mind. But you seem to be on top of it =O

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

crumblygumbly In reply to AngeliqueAlene [2010-01-22 06:24:51 +0000 UTC]

Ah, and I wasn't offended per se, just sort of "...why the hell would she say that?" Considering that the judge's focus is usually story and characters, so those of course would go first. The fact that the background is simplified is something that the judges actually addressed in their critique of me and when asking a judge, simple backgrounds are definitely not a problem, nor are they usually a problem in terms of storytelling. Like you said, no backgrounds at ALL are the problems or OVERLY simplified backgrounds. I'd like to think I at least gave the thought that he's somewhere someplace and there's perspective.

Also, the fact that the person I'm up against in their round 1 comic didn't have very complicated backgrounds themselves, and neither did a few other contestants. The suggestion that I could lose a tournament on the basis that my backgrounds weren't detailed enough was kind of "what the fuck?" to me.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AngeliqueAlene In reply to crumblygumbly [2010-01-25 05:08:19 +0000 UTC]

That does make more sense, now that I am more informed =O

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

crumblygumbly In reply to AngeliqueAlene [2010-01-25 05:12:46 +0000 UTC]

Well, I don't think it takes much information to figure it out...work-load wise I tend to do more than the other contestants anyways because I write too much, so details that are quite literally "in the background" are obviously not going to be a focus

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AngeliqueAlene In reply to crumblygumbly [2010-01-25 05:44:42 +0000 UTC]

I did notice you tend to er, create more than most. Curse, gift, what have you, it's a lot to take on even without having to make sparkling backgrounds. I completely agree with that.
But as I am not privy to judge's minds I don't know their standards, and didn't know how strict or lax their expectations of anyone happen to be. Who knew, maybe they expected you to make said sparkling backgrounds, where you can make out every little crack in the wall that dear Ned is leaning against. Had that been the case... well good luck with that. As it is, it is not. So no worries.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

crumblygumbly In reply to AngeliqueAlene [2010-01-25 05:47:21 +0000 UTC]

Well, considering my last opponent went more into detail with his backgrounds than I did in the last round, I would have been kicked out before hand wouldn't I? XD

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AngeliqueAlene In reply to crumblygumbly [2010-01-25 05:56:32 +0000 UTC]

Of course not, because everyone loves Ned. U_U

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

crumblygumbly In reply to AngeliqueAlene [2010-01-22 06:15:44 +0000 UTC]

PFFF I have twenty pages to do I'm not going to draw detailed backgrounds XDDDD THat was a conscious choice.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AngeliqueAlene In reply to crumblygumbly [2010-01-25 05:08:52 +0000 UTC]

And that was an intelligent decision. :nods:

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Phantosanucca [2010-01-21 04:17:34 +0000 UTC]

Seeing Birdie and Ned on the same page, it...

It... It just feels so right.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

IronBloodAika [2010-01-21 03:48:27 +0000 UTC]

Yay! Loving this new chapter so far. I don't know what you were worried about though, your backgrounds look awesome!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

musicamode [2010-01-21 03:38:47 +0000 UTC]

Hmm... the way Birdie's dressed reminds me of the Plague doctors from the 1600s.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Weird-Oddball-Girl [2010-01-21 03:29:45 +0000 UTC]

Very excellent, Birdie looks awesome.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

tantus [2010-01-21 03:22:21 +0000 UTC]

I like how Birdie has his pinky slightly up while holding the binocs.

Ned seems to have a stalker.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

crumblygumbly In reply to tantus [2010-01-21 03:24:27 +0000 UTC]

DON'T YOU KNOW THE RULES OF THE GENTLEMANSHIP? PINKIE OUT!

And the rules of stalkership dictate binocular use.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Ajkl [2010-01-21 03:14:49 +0000 UTC]

Is that a plague doctor?!?!
You have me intrigued

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ithief11 [2010-01-21 02:59:49 +0000 UTC]

O.O

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Cei-Ellem [2010-01-21 02:53:25 +0000 UTC]

Ooh! The excitement! And the best part is getting to read both yours and 's with different takes on the same characters AT THE SAME TIME! ^_^

Side note: it almost looks like Birdie's foot is growing out of his head in that last panel

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

miniongtt [2010-01-21 02:41:27 +0000 UTC]

Fffff win <3

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

CassidyPeterson [2010-01-21 02:37:58 +0000 UTC]

Aw, sleepyNed is adorable. I love how he reassures "Lucy" before konking out.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MissusHow [2010-01-21 02:36:58 +0000 UTC]

Oooo! can't wait for the rest of thiiiis!!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Buuya [2010-01-21 02:35:42 +0000 UTC]

YesyesYES.

Birdie looks delightful. So very delightful.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

AngelsTurtle [2010-01-21 02:34:34 +0000 UTC]

YAY!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0