HOME | DD

#belle #bottomless #disney #skirted #bimbettes #beautyandthebeast
Published: 2015-03-01 18:23:45 +0000 UTC; Views: 36068; Favourites: 526; Downloads: 160
Redirect to original
Description
"Hell hath",and all that.......!Related content
Comments: 34
ppppeee [2024-10-21 00:45:03 +0000 UTC]
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
DragonOfKnox [2023-05-15 22:00:00 +0000 UTC]
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
Anonomitz [2017-03-09 04:10:04 +0000 UTC]
"Look, there she goes
That girl has nottt a stitch onnnnn.
Dub-yoo-tee-eff and what the helllll....
It's a pity and a sin.
Her chips are cashing in.
Her few remaining marbles lost, that BELLLLLE."
Anybody else feel free to continue this.
👍: 3 ⏩: 1
Anonomitz [2017-03-09 04:06:23 +0000 UTC]
Boy, imagine if it had been THAT kind of movie... XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ragingspacebull [2017-01-26 02:04:22 +0000 UTC]
"All right you, we demand some answers!"
"A-Answers to what?"
"Why did you steal Gaston from us and how?"
"There's no why or how to it at all, I don't even like the man!"
"Well, there has to be something you're not telling and we demand to know or else!"
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
ctdsnark In reply to ragingspacebull [2017-01-26 16:52:27 +0000 UTC]
I never considered any sort of dialogue when doing this.... to you!
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
otnesse [2017-01-25 04:15:18 +0000 UTC]
I must admit, I don't recall you ever doing any... well, any b-day suit artwork of the triplets. Any reason why? Just curious, since it's a bit odd that you don't have them exposed, either willingly or unwillingly. Though if you don't want to you don't have to. Don't really care either way, just found it odd, especially when they seem to have some involvement in Belle losing her clothes like in here or at least mocking her ruined dress like beneath that fair façade artwork.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ctdsnark In reply to otnesse [2017-01-25 17:45:59 +0000 UTC]
We all have our preferences...but your observation is valid.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
rbskullhead In reply to ctdsnark [2016-06-28 16:49:22 +0000 UTC]
What happened to the fully nude pic
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ctdsnark In reply to rbskullhead [2016-06-28 17:16:25 +0000 UTC]
"Fully nude"?
If you're referring to a version where they've stripped her completely,I've never done that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
rbskullhead In reply to ctdsnark [2016-06-28 17:34:14 +0000 UTC]
Sorry I was thinking about rale 43
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
otnesse [2015-06-13 20:55:22 +0000 UTC]
Funny, the film never depicted the triplets like that regarding Belle at all (which is truly a shame, really, because the way the triplets were depicted in the film, crushing on Gaston aside, they came across as much more pure-hearted than Belle [thanks to Katzenberg and Woolverton idiotically pushing for a feminist twist in the fairy tale that was completely unneeded and if anything made Belle into a jerk.]. You'd think that they'd actually be depicted as jealous and spiteful towards Belle, but no, they apparently went to her wedding and helped set it up without even a hint at not wanting to be there, and all without even being aware of Gaston being the groom, to say little about how their reaction to Belle's the exact opposite of how a jealous person would view a potential rival refusing the guy they crushed on [jealous people would not say "What's wrong with her? She's crazy! He's gorgeous!" to a person who just refused to go with the guy they crushed on. Not even Ron Weasley managed to pull that off during his stint of jealousy with Harry Potter during the Triwizard Cup, and at least in the book, he actually acted like he supported him with thinly veiled hate for Harry as a result.].). I think the closest to this kind of characterization (ie, hateful of Belle and wishing to do her harm) was in the Marvel Comics, which ironically made them OOC to the film to some extent (that as well as the musical). What's worse is that they were supposed to be the closest things to foils for Belle, not to mention the closest characterization to her wicked sisters in the original tale, and yet they don't even behave in any way that even hints at their being internally ugly in the film, leaving the moral broken on Belle's end.
Not sure whether to support this line of work (you indicate you're a catholic on your blog, but I'm still not sure about this, being a fellow catholic myself...), but nonetheless, good job. Kinda wish the film did depict them like this, though (well, obviously without the skirting part, since it is supposed to be for a family audience. Then again, Lumiere was implied to have been a womanizer who sleeps around in the film and this was despite it being a family film, but I digress... I'm meaning more their being spiteful, jealous, and hateful of Belle). At least then, Belle actually WOULD have a foil for the whole "true beauty comes from within" message, something the final version of the film severely lacked and thus acted as a huge detriment (Gaston's Beast's foil, so he doesn't count).
EDIT: And I just want to mention this before anyone gets any ideas, no, I don't like the triplets. I may trust them more than Belle right now thanks to... certain things I wish I hadn't had to experience in college or study history about, but make no mistake, I don't like them (at best, I'm lukewarm and aloof to them). I'm just saying that their characterizations as well as Belle's characterization in the film, especially for a true beauty comes from within tale, were badly done, since you can't really find anything truly negative about them that actually points to internal ugliness, while with Belle, there's little in her behavior and actions in the film that points to her even being internally beautiful, unfortunately.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ctdsnark In reply to otnesse [2015-06-14 18:52:34 +0000 UTC]
WOW...I certainly appreciate the feedback (and on behind that fair facade as well),but I think you're reading a little toooo much into this.
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
otnesse In reply to 575-NaughtyArt [2015-06-13 20:56:07 +0000 UTC]
I thought she WAS wearing her shirt, or are you trying to say "Why DON'T they took off her shirt?"
Well, if it's the latter, I really don't know.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
575-NaughtyArt In reply to otnesse [2015-06-14 00:48:46 +0000 UTC]
Yes, the latter one. Why?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
otnesse In reply to 575-NaughtyArt [2015-06-14 00:55:16 +0000 UTC]
Like I said, I really don't know. Only ctdsnark would know the answer to that, really, since he made the artwork.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
michiganj24 [2015-03-02 03:55:48 +0000 UTC]
Two hours later Beast returned with shreds of green, orange and red fabric as a gift for Belle
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
otnesse In reply to michiganj24 [2015-06-13 21:15:19 +0000 UTC]
Let's hope the shreds of fabric don't have blood on there, because I don't like the implications of that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
otnesse In reply to michiganj24 [2015-06-14 20:52:10 +0000 UTC]
I... I beg your pardon? I'm sorry, I don't recall my post talking about Harry or anything like that, or characters by him? Care to elaborate with that comment?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
michiganj24 In reply to otnesse [2015-06-14 21:10:42 +0000 UTC]
Um signals are crossed I replied that to someone elses comment on the Simpsons...hmmm curiouser and curioser
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Rammsteinfan1994 [2015-03-01 19:48:32 +0000 UTC]
Wonder if belle will get the beast do that to them
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
otnesse In reply to Rammsteinfan1994 [2015-06-14 10:54:44 +0000 UTC]
Keep in mind that if Belle did that, she'd be no different than them, and she definitely would not be depicted as being internally beautiful with that action (then again... the original film thanks to Katzenberg and Woolverton did a very poor job of actually conveying the "true beauty comes from within" moral between Belle and the triplets anyway, considering Belle was depicted as largely being a jerk for most of the first half and in the second half she was pretty much an idiot, while with the triplets, we literally can't see anything they did that actually would point at them being ugly on the inside, even WITH their crushing on Gaston. C'mon, Disney, would it have killed you to make the three more like Drizella and Anastasia in terms of behavior or even in terms of physical beauty considering they contradicted the claim that Belle was the most beautiful woman in the village!?).
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
BorisFedorov [2015-03-01 18:41:38 +0000 UTC]
Now that's some naughty trick. I always like your dirty Disney pictures.
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
ctdsnark In reply to BorisFedorov [2015-03-02 17:37:04 +0000 UTC]
I really appreciate that....thanks!
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
BorisFedorov In reply to ctdsnark [2015-03-02 19:28:28 +0000 UTC]
No problem, Disney's a easy target for comedy.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0