HOME | DD
D3L1GHT β A Good Fascist
by
Published: 2009-01-24 13:09:39 +0000 UTC; Views: 4328; Favourites: 59; Downloads: 71
Redirect to original
Description
Flame stock by sxc.hu,image created with Paint.NET
Related content
Comments: 57
I don't think Fascism means what you think it means.Β
π: 1 β©: 0
That's the Nazi symbol. The fascist symbol is a bundle of sticks.
π: 0 β©: 0
And they say we Fascists are the ones that generalize and stereotype people.
π: 0 β©: 1
π: 0 β©: 0
I'm curious why use a Swastika while saying Fascist? Β Its like using a Hammer and Sickle when calling someone a Socialist.
π: 0 β©: 0
Nop m8. Fascism is the only true political ideology.
Get owned scrub, play time is ogre.Β
π: 0 β©: 0
Actually, the nazis were national socialists, hence the name nazi. Mussolini was a fascist. That doesn't mean they one sucks less than the other. They all suck. I'm just a stickler for terms is all.
π: 0 β©: 1
They used "socialist" as a way of appealing to the working classes, as socialism was a fairly popular idea at the time. There was nothing actually socialist in Nazism.
π: 0 β©: 1
Actually, there was, because Nazism means the expansion of the nation state through the control of the market place, which is what socialism is; control of the market. See, they funneled wealth from the economy and diverted it to the war effort to expand their empire instead of distributing it back into the economy. I think the kind of socialism you're referring to is communism where there is only one class and the government distributes the wealth.
π: 0 β©: 1
No, that's dogshit. You are dogshit. Read a book.
π: 0 β©: 1
Jeez. What's your problem? I was simply elaborating on the complexities of economic theory. Most things in the world aren't black and white, including this.
π: 0 β©: 1
Nazism=socialism=me letting you know that you're a piece of shit. Seriously, you're embarrassing yourself. It's pathetic. Go away.
π: 0 β©: 1
The only one that seems to be embarrassing themselves is you. You're just being angry without direction and haven't said anything of substance.
π: 0 β©: 1
You're trying to argue with a Socialist, what do you expect. They cry for democracy and freedom but cannot stand the idea's of others or even the thought that others can define there own idea's.
"I'm a conservative" No you're a reactionary
I'm a liberal" No you're pettie bourgeois.
π: 0 β©: 1
Sorry but socialist don't see the world in racial categories and don't put one race above the other. In fact,hitler even killed other socialists in that time.
π: 0 β©: 0
Awesome art man, and i totally agree. All nazis must be erradicated
π: 0 β©: 0
death to all those fascist pigs that have made world hell for everyone
π: 0 β©: 0
Well I can see you don't have to be a nazi to scream death and hate at something you don't understand.
π: 0 β©: 0
Fascism is not nazism. Was Benito Mussolini racist? No.
π: 0 β©: 1
Flagged as Spam
π: 0 β©: 1
Who wasn't at that time?
π: 0 β©: 1
Flagged as Spam
π: 0 β©: 1
Yah. mostly communists.
π: 0 β©: 1
Flagged as Spam
π: 0 β©: 1
Oh yeah I see.
π: 0 β©: 0
The Nazis were National Socialists not fascists
π: 0 β©: 2
And they built their government of fascism.
π: 0 β©: 1
What bollocks. One would have to be either ignorant of history or intellectually dishonest to make such a nonsensical claim.
Neither Hitler nor the Nazi were 'socialist' in the least. Indeed, socialism is both common ownership over the means of production and subsequently freedom of exploitation. Nazi Germany did not achieve nor promote either of these topics, instead concentrating power into the hands of the few and using indoctrination, scapegoats and militarism to control the masses.
Hitler was actually very supportive of the world markets' involvement with his country, and vice versa. Coca cola,, was constantly distributed throughout the nation, and the very aspect of 'unemployment' dropping to zilch (except for, you know, the jews, who were victims of this disgusting, FASCIST movement)implies that there are still capitalists 'employing' and exploiting them.
Not only were the Nazis fascist, but they were also clearly capitalist.
Learn your terms. Learn your economics. Learn your history.
π: 1 β©: 1
I believe you mean Nazism or Hitlerism. The Swastika has many meanings and the fascist ideology was simply used by the Nazis. Being a fascist does not make one a Nazi.
The Swastika can be seen as a sign of strength and a symbol of the will to start a revolution (not always a bad one).
I do not support Hitler or the Nazi party.
π: 0 β©: 0
smash national socialism
smash international socialism
π: 0 β©: 1
Why do you want to smash the later? You want to smash a pro-(direct)democratic, solidarity, anti-racist, pro-LGBT, pro-feminist and pro-human-rights movement, that is also the drive of our labor unions? Gimme' a break.
π: 0 β©: 1
because it's just another form of slavery
π: 0 β©: 1
I can see the current form of democracy is; I don't see it in the latter. That you choose an even more oppressive form of slavery I see no logic in.
π: 0 β©: 2
How is it freedom, when you choose to be anti-democratic?
π: 0 β©: 0
I choose freedom, so wtf?
π: 0 β©: 1
Freedom of what exactly? The freedom to take away another's?
That's not freedom. That's privilege.
π: 0 β©: 1
there's no such thing as 'freedom to', freedom is always 'from'
taking away another's property is known as theft or taxation
π: 0 β©: 1
What is this word-twisting rhetoricifying bullshit!? It doesn't matter which way you fucking phrase it? If you allow a fascist a voice, then you are directly tolerating a group of people who ardently wish to TAKE AWAY THAT SAME FREEDOM!
The counterintuitive of you Americans burns me from the inside out.
And as a side note, how is it theft if the property is not then owned by someone else? One could make the argument that it is actually the owner of private property who is keeping the naturally unowned land from the people who work it every day.
π: 0 β©: 0
| Next =>