HOME | DD
D3L1GHT β The New Germany
by
Published: 2009-02-28 16:19:43 +0000 UTC; Views: 963; Favourites: 5; Downloads: 8
Redirect to original
Description
I'm hoping for an anarchistic communistic (anarchosyndicalistic) Germany in the Future.In the name of peace and freedom for everyone.
Related content
Comments: 17
Don't you dare. Keep your claws off my ancestral homeland.
π: 0 β©: 0
Look up Slab City, California. You want that all over Germany and Europe?
π: 0 β©: 0
Communism represented by hammer an sickle is a bit thick...
π: 0 β©: 0
not really all those things u said came from Western ideas, and books, ahhso naive, please pal look into "democracy" and Capitalist crime, few examples - Chile and the Pinochet Coup, and the labour policy in Asia, but multinational corporations ie Wallmart, 
π: 0 β©: 0
Anarchy only causes destruction, death, and chaos, along with lawlessness and violence.
Communism is an ideology that discriminates religion by forcing people to practice it privately, causes poverty, everyone have equal money, and at some communist states having genocide.
π: 0 β©: 2
Anarchism is against the idea of RULERS, not rules and laws.
"While the popular understanding of anarchism is of a violent, anti-State movement, anarchism is a much more subtle and nuanced tradition then a simple opposition to government power. Anarchists oppose the idea that power and domination are necessary for society, and instead advocate more co-operative, anti-hierarchical forms of social, political and economic organisation."Β [The Politics of Individualism, p. 106]
www.spunk.org/texts/intro/faq/β¦
I thought this might help you.
π: 0 β©: 1
Well, that's what anarchy basically is, but I doubt that it ever promotes stability because it seems quite chaotic by nature and, since it does not support government, hiearchy, or law and instead leans closer to tribalism, because there does not appear to be a hierarchy and the cheif is the leader, but usually doesn't have real power because tribes usually are more like primitive communes (but they're not communists). Communism, capitalism, fascism, democracy, oligarchy, dictatorship, theocracy are formed under a specific set of laws and anarchism does not appear to have such. Therefore, anarchy is neither dictatorship or democracy, but primal, mobocratic barbarism.
π: 0 β©: 1
it does not support government, hiearchy, or law
jim.com/anarchy/law_in_anarchyβ¦
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchisβ¦
www.wsm.ie/c/anarchism-policinβ¦
π: 0 β©: 2
And also, the idea of anarchists making law sounds more like direct democracy than true anarchy. Your view of anarchy, backed by theories of "anarchist law" you found on the internet is likely to result in the same flawed construct as ancient Athenean democracy, which failed as the result pf Pericles's death, poor military strategy, factionalism, and leaderlessness. The modern form of democracy is more benefitial and less chaotic in comparison and the US Constitution and capitalism (especially includes private property rights for all people both rich and poor) are good example of how society under the people should be about.
π: 0 β©: 0
And mobocracy is not really government. It is another word for lawlessness. Believe me. I understand what you mean by no hierarchy, law, or government. Barbarism is primordal and savage and fits perfectly to those who reject government, law, and hierarchy. I am an individualist, but not an anarchist. And you don't have to remind me because I know what anarchy is.
π: 0 β©: 0
There are no comminist states. A communist state is a paradox.
π: 0 β©: 0
How about a combination of guild socialism and anarchism? Or left-anarchism? Those would be great.
π: 0 β©: 0
Eh? U mean half of germany being Communist the other half being in anarchy?
Why's that then?
π: 0 β©: 1
I had been afraid that someone would say that
Yeah, I know, I didn't make it that clear.
Uhm, I'm hoping for a communistic Anarchism like Anarchosyndicalism, which is representated by a red-black flag.
π: 0 β©: 1
Ah allright. That does make more sense then. Maybe you could add that to the deviant description?
Interesting idea by the way.
π: 0 β©: 1