HOME | DD
da-flo — Time Ripples
by
Published: 2008-04-11 10:56:32 +0000 UTC; Views: 875; Favourites: 8; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
Visualisation of the operation "remainder on the division by 2" (in other words, parity) taken relative to the even moduli.Click here [link] to see the full-size original image (2560x1600).
See Time Ripples 2 [link] for a more detailed look at the structure.
Enjoy.
Related content
Comments: 10
That looks beautiful. Something I would hang on my wall
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Oh, and I forgot, thank you for the 
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Thank you so very much. :aww.
It's quite touching that you say that, because this (as are the other pictures in my gallery at the moment) is a really rough kind of rendering.
Trust me, it could (and probably will in the future) be much better esthetically. But I'm quite amazed myself at how beautiful the geometric structure is in itself.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Woh-ho-ho!
I could stare at this for hours......
10/10!
And something VERY rare to get from me> :fav+:
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Thank you. I'm pleased to hear that.
Oh, believe me, sometimes I do stare at these pictures for hours, lost in line bundles.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
This image speaks to my heart on this awful day. It gives me great comfort. My beloved died yesterday and this image speaks to me of that. I see his light moving off into the distance where I cannot follow. But it also gives me hope because I can see the light of his love is still there and will always be there. I know you couldn't have possibly had this in mind when you created it. But it speaks to me and gives me comfort and I thank you for that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Thanks. 
Also, I'm sorry to hear of your loss. You have my sincerest sympathy.
I am really pleased that this picture touches you, and I'm glad I could unexpectedly comfort you with it.
Of course, I could not foresee in the creation process what your insights and feelings would be upon viewing the picture. But the way a person can relate subjectively to a piece of art is definitely one of the things what makes Art so special.
As a matter of fact, in the kind of pictures I'm currently making, the composition is pretty much bound by the arithmetical algorithm I'm using and studying. In a way, the only thing I actually do is highlight the graphical visualisation of it trough the rendering method I apply (which is still really basic for now). I don't really deserve credit for the creating/choosing the structure parameters (which are just a handful of simple integers). My intervention is merely uncovering those which parts of these abstract objects bear outstanding or peculiar properties, harmony or visual interest. Even though I might be more a discoverer than a creator, I take an artistic point of view, for instance in the presentation and polishing (as much as I'm able), and usually think much about the insight I get with the piece and the deep interpretations I can make of it.
Besides, not only was I pleased when read how the picture touched you, but it was really thought-provoking, when taking into account what insight and ideas I myself had about it, and especially thinking of what the picture algorithmically represents, the semantics of the words and of what came to your mind about the picture : For example the number two and the concepts of parity, division, and the remainder (and the fact the word remainder is singular in deed, since mathematically for the division by 2 there is only one (non zero) possible remainder (1)). Also, I tried to put the harmony and complex interlacing of the structure in relation to your interpretation. All that was quite striking.
Anyway, I really love to see people appreciate or relate to my works. It's a pleasure both because of the pleasure it brought to the viewer and because it increases my confidence and the faith in what I'm doing (that might not be unrelated to the fact that I only began to actively make digital art recently). Thanks again.
(sorry for the lengths 
👍: 0 ⏩: 1