HOME | DD

DavidCraigEllis — Infrared Tree II

Published: 2008-06-04 22:21:34 +0000 UTC; Views: 4414; Favourites: 206; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description Infrared shot by the River Dee on Merseyside UK - Part of 'The Park' series....
Nikon D70 / Kood R72




My Infrared Gallery => [link]
Related content
Comments: 59

DavidCraigEllis In reply to ??? [2014-10-10 17:13:34 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

xzendor7 [2011-11-11 00:45:29 +0000 UTC]

Stunning Photograph
You Create Some Awesome Infra Red Photography.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DavidCraigEllis In reply to xzendor7 [2011-11-12 03:53:11 +0000 UTC]

Many thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

fractalhead [2011-09-07 15:53:20 +0000 UTC]

lovely work

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

OnlyTheName [2011-02-10 16:36:19 +0000 UTC]

i'm jealous! -.-

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

JoseMelim [2011-01-15 21:17:20 +0000 UTC]

Wonderful achievement! I like the strong branches dark tones and the light grass and leafs. The almost grey sky is amazing and add the picture a great atmosphere.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Peppercookie [2010-12-12 22:03:20 +0000 UTC]

Featured in my journal - [link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DavidCraigEllis In reply to Peppercookie [2010-12-12 22:39:28 +0000 UTC]

Thanks again

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

stopthebus [2010-09-01 03:37:03 +0000 UTC]

the tree and the sky contrast is awesome... it looks foreboding and a little ominous and really beautiful.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Rin-Uzuki [2010-07-30 09:15:58 +0000 UTC]

The white leaves are so beautiful...
and the color of the sky and the powerlines...
I feel as though I could stare at this forever!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DavidCraigEllis In reply to Rin-Uzuki [2010-08-17 22:48:47 +0000 UTC]

Tnx again

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

dennissnider [2010-07-02 22:01:28 +0000 UTC]

Thats just epic.... REALLY makes me wanna fork out the cash for a filter now.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DavidCraigEllis In reply to dennissnider [2010-07-14 20:20:48 +0000 UTC]

Thanks Dennis , much appreciated (and go for the filter my friend! )

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

dennissnider In reply to DavidCraigEllis [2010-07-18 19:31:57 +0000 UTC]

It is gonna be my next purchase!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DavidCraigEllis In reply to dennissnider [2010-07-21 10:08:16 +0000 UTC]

Before you rush in make sure you've got an IR compatable camera body

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

dennissnider In reply to DavidCraigEllis [2010-07-21 17:11:41 +0000 UTC]

Now see......I have LOADS to learn. I had NO idea about having a compatible body. Just thought it was a filter like all others and would work. I shall google it and see!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DavidCraigEllis In reply to dennissnider [2010-07-26 20:16:10 +0000 UTC]

Well, if you do go for a filter and need any advice or info i'd be happy to oblige. I've got a tutorial written up as a word document because i was getting a lot of questions about my technique which youre welcome to, and has a good tutorial linked from his profile page

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

dennissnider In reply to DavidCraigEllis [2010-07-26 20:50:48 +0000 UTC]

As soon as I think I am getting the ability to think seriously about buying one....I will note you my email address and you can email that word doc. I am ALL about tutorials on here! Thanks again man! I also added them to my watch...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DavidCraigEllis In reply to dennissnider [2010-07-26 21:55:30 +0000 UTC]

Just get one and get stuck in! , actually - if your cameras okay for IR and you have the information on 'how to' its fairly simple - i'll 'note' you that process doc so you can see what i mean

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

dennissnider In reply to DavidCraigEllis [2010-07-26 22:33:22 +0000 UTC]

Thanks again Dave! I am really looking forward to getting into the IR world! One more thing....and I could probably Google it and find out but since you are here....how exactly can I tell if my camera can be used for IR? I have a Sony a550.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DavidCraigEllis In reply to dennissnider [2010-07-31 19:45:40 +0000 UTC]

I had a look but the a550 is a fairly new release and i couldnt find much - i think sony's are usually okay but best check - go to gilads tutorial again and check the bit about the remote control test

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

dennissnider In reply to DavidCraigEllis [2010-07-31 19:51:39 +0000 UTC]

I already read up on that VERY test man! AND have a filter picked out. Think I am gonna go with the Hoya and it wont cost near as much as I was thinking because I was looking up prices for the 10-20mm wide angle before talking to you. So instead I would only need a 55mm filter for my 18-55 instead of a 77mm for the wide angle. HUGE difference in price!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DavidCraigEllis In reply to dennissnider [2010-08-01 12:37:07 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, a 55mm should be a good price, probably 1/3 of the price of a 77mm. And the Hoya is definitely the way to go - best quality.

I did a bit of a kit upgrade at the end of last year and decided to replace all my filters with Hoya/Hoya Pro (why spend big bucks on a lense and then put a £10 filter on the front?)
The new standard zoom i bought was a Nikkor 16-85mm which is maybe not a 'pro' lense but certainly mid-high end piece of kit - its a 67mm dia so fairly large and i bought a Hoya Pro1 UV, Hoya Pro Cir Pol, Hoya ND400 and a Hoya R72 - cost me about £250/$400

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

dennissnider In reply to DavidCraigEllis [2010-08-01 14:40:48 +0000 UTC]

Oh but it was worth every bit of it! LOOK at the work you are producing with it now Dave! WOW man! I think you bring up a good point about going ahead and getting quality filters for your quality glass. Might was well....it will be a better investment in the long run that way! I seriously have to thank you again for all the help man. I am excited about getting into this and am also thinking about going ahead and ordering my ND400 I have been dying to have for my wide angle. LOL!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

DustXO [2010-06-01 18:10:54 +0000 UTC]

Featured : [link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

dijimucks [2010-05-09 23:40:17 +0000 UTC]

Awesome new stuff in your collection! You get 6 favs in a row from me thought!!
Infrared filters are so mysterious to me I love the result it makes, whatever how it makes it

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DavidCraigEllis In reply to dijimucks [2010-05-13 22:36:37 +0000 UTC]

Thanks Matt - much appreciated and believe me Infrared is a mystery to me some days...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

zootnik [2010-04-23 03:40:37 +0000 UTC]

You keep getting better and better...how are you going to beat this?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DavidCraigEllis In reply to zootnik [2010-04-26 21:27:26 +0000 UTC]

I'll just keep pointing and clicking till something turns up..

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ExorRoly [2010-04-21 12:46:47 +0000 UTC]

This dev has been featured here: [link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DavidCraigEllis In reply to ExorRoly [2010-04-26 21:43:24 +0000 UTC]

Thanks again

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ExorRoly In reply to DavidCraigEllis [2010-04-26 22:59:22 +0000 UTC]

Welcome

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

jarhhhhyeah [2010-04-18 13:58:37 +0000 UTC]

yep. amazing again.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DavidCraigEllis In reply to jarhhhhyeah [2010-04-26 21:56:46 +0000 UTC]

Thanks again!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

usedtoit03 [2010-04-18 08:27:32 +0000 UTC]

Nice color! One thing feels odd though, the power lines in the bottom left just above the tree line. Thanks for sharing the work!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DavidCraigEllis In reply to usedtoit03 [2010-04-26 22:08:09 +0000 UTC]

Thanks I think youre right about the power lines - will have a go at cloning 'em out

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

DwayneF [2008-12-03 00:16:43 +0000 UTC]

Easily one of the best IR shots I've seen!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DavidCraigEllis In reply to DwayneF [2008-12-03 00:43:44 +0000 UTC]

Hey Thanks, I really appreciate that

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

damien-c [2008-07-03 11:34:59 +0000 UTC]

Featured: [link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

35mil [2008-06-11 16:26:26 +0000 UTC]

This image is featured in my journal [link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Jazzhead [2008-06-08 18:15:43 +0000 UTC]

nice

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

zider-red [2008-06-05 18:58:56 +0000 UTC]

stunning work

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DavidCraigEllis In reply to zider-red [2008-06-06 12:19:45 +0000 UTC]

Thanks my friend

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

zider-red In reply to DavidCraigEllis [2008-06-08 11:34:34 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Autistatic [2008-06-05 17:25:54 +0000 UTC]

nice color!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DavidCraigEllis In reply to Autistatic [2008-06-06 12:27:23 +0000 UTC]

Thank you

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Autistatic In reply to DavidCraigEllis [2008-06-06 21:32:10 +0000 UTC]

did you changed the color from the leafs with photoshop or is it real?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DavidCraigEllis In reply to Autistatic [2008-06-14 22:50:54 +0000 UTC]

[Sorry for late reply - computer was/is dead ]

Not fixed in photoshop... taken using and infrared filter on the camera which blocks most of the visable light spectrum

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Autistatic In reply to DavidCraigEllis [2008-06-18 21:14:10 +0000 UTC]

oke but i thought that people used infrared filters for black-white photo's
cause the filter is red so you photo's look red to so i don't get it!
so when you make it black and white there a hole lot more contrast in the photo

maybe i got a wrong filter in my head or something!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DavidCraigEllis In reply to Autistatic [2008-06-18 22:56:57 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, people used dark red filters in film photography to increase contrast/ darken sky - proper infrared filters are so dense you cant see through them with the naked eye and they block nearly all the colour spectrum , (check my favs gallery 'infrared' for loads of examples)

👍: 0 ⏩: 0


| Next =>