HOME | DD

Published: 2009-02-25 15:31:57 +0000 UTC; Views: 157504; Favourites: 1141; Downloads: 6389
Redirect to original
Description
Just a quick mockup I did for a client. Was rejected (and this doesn't mean that you can use in your own website). It's a copyrighted work.My portfolio: [link]
My twitter: [link]
Background image by Laurent Baumann [link]
Zip include de original image and the black mod by me.
[link]
Related content
Comments: 174
kurtss [2009-03-18 15:02:00 +0000 UTC]
designwise this is good, usability wise ahmmmmmm......
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Jam061000 [2009-03-17 06:11:44 +0000 UTC]
What font did you use for the navigation up top?
I love the design though, very clean, simple and mysterious looking!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DDrDark In reply to Jam061000 [2009-03-17 09:22:14 +0000 UTC]
I guess it's myriad pro, or helvetica .
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Svendsen [2009-03-16 06:15:28 +0000 UTC]
It's allright, but nothing more than that. The depth and stuff is good, but theres no really finish on the content. The content text looks half done and not any good.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DDrDark In reply to Svendsen [2009-03-16 12:10:45 +0000 UTC]
really? you should read the description... "Quick mockup"....
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DDrDark In reply to Svendsen [2009-03-16 16:03:55 +0000 UTC]
then your comment make no sense
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Svendsen In reply to DDrDark [2009-03-16 16:05:39 +0000 UTC]
why doesnt it make any sense?:s Cant you handle critics?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DDrDark In reply to Svendsen [2009-03-16 16:41:24 +0000 UTC]
Of course!, In fact... You're 100% right... it's not finished because it was just a "quick mockup" I've made for the client. You've to think that I can't spend 3 hours making just a free mockup for a client .
So your comment of "..but theres no really finish on the content. The content text looks half done and not any good." doesn't make sense because we all already know that
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Svendsen In reply to DDrDark [2009-03-16 18:15:20 +0000 UTC]
Tough you were going to use it for your self. It was the typography I were thinking of
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
cLuddy [2009-03-13 12:16:43 +0000 UTC]
It's nice man but it's almost a megabyte in size. You would need to knock the image quality down a good bit to make it an acceptable size to use as a web page
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
The5Elements [2009-03-08 12:21:14 +0000 UTC]
Really stupid rejection if you ask me. The layout is totally gorgeous... And you just gave me a few ideas for my portfolio.
The design totally rocks too. ^^
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Absence- [2009-03-04 07:03:53 +0000 UTC]
This is really a beautiful design, one thing ive learnt doing web - people are so full of crap when it comes to design!
Obviously I dont know the reason for the rejection, but great work anyways!
Well done man!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Aldaeld [2009-03-04 06:22:25 +0000 UTC]
Dios! Es estupendio tio, me gustaria usarlo en uno de mis proyectos. Ya hablaremos del tema.
Cuidate y sigue creando! ^^
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
TheSprunk [2009-03-04 05:09:49 +0000 UTC]
Wow, nice work. Sleek design and good use of white space
Who made the thumbnail of the car?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Ghost-110010 In reply to strohat [2009-03-04 04:34:16 +0000 UTC]
Ya. That's an awesome piece of art!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
reconish In reply to ??? [2009-03-04 02:31:41 +0000 UTC]
PLEASE tell me that you still have the source for it
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
redfeatherraven [2009-03-04 02:23:55 +0000 UTC]
rejected? some moron missed out big-time.
brilliant stuff here. :3
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
saintvinasse [2009-03-04 00:18:12 +0000 UTC]
well... if the big banner is for ads... no wonder it has been rejected.
very cool design anyway
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
TheAL [2009-03-03 21:09:41 +0000 UTC]
Where might one go to acquire the Laurent Baumann background? I see no conspicuous way of doing so on the site to which you link.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
stephenjimenez In reply to ??? [2009-03-03 20:50:20 +0000 UTC]
Your client was a dumbass to reject you.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Wakkoun [2009-03-03 19:35:32 +0000 UTC]
great . .love the hi quality of view .. u know .. like ure in a really really expensive house
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
masHugac [2009-03-03 19:20:56 +0000 UTC]
Looks VERY nice! id love to browse a page like that ^^
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
dr-graff [2009-03-03 18:54:03 +0000 UTC]
very nice! kinda like the concept i'm carrying in my mind for my website.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
sstech [2009-03-03 18:48:33 +0000 UTC]
Really good work. I love it.
But as you weren't clear what your clients wanted that's why it was rejected.
*To others, doesn't mean it looks freakishly nice it should be accepted; when it doesn't meet the requirements.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
| Next =>