HOME | DD

Published: 2013-10-07 15:19:21 +0000 UTC; Views: 8049; Favourites: 133; Downloads: 59
Redirect to original
Description
A = ProceratosaurusB = Guanlong
C = Sinotyrannus
D = Dilong
E = Eotyrannus
F = Xiongguanlong
G = Yutyrannus
H = Appalachiosaurus
I = Bistahieversor
J = Gorgosaurus
K = Albertosaurus
L = Daspletosaurus
M = Alioramus
N = Teratophoneus
O = Tyrannosaurus
P = Tarbosaurus
Q = Nanotyrannus
Roughly to scale, skull nomenclature here:Β www.deviantart.com/art/Dinosauβ¦
Related content
Comments: 50
dolphin-xht [2014-05-02 04:45:56 +0000 UTC]
I think you might have messed up the sequence between Albertosaurus and Daspletosaurus. K should be Daspletosaurus and L should be Albertosaurus in my opinion...
π: 0 β©: 0
Megalosaurid [2014-01-09 00:20:46 +0000 UTC]
Your T.rex skull is 1.46 m long in Pmx-QJ and 1.53Β m in Pmx-Occ. it matches wellΒ with HartmanΒ΄s reconstruction (1.451 and 1.52 m)Β
π: 0 β©: 2
FiliusTonitrui In reply to Megalosaurid [2015-09-23 20:14:21 +0000 UTC]
I think his skull is more than 1,5 meters long.
π: 0 β©: 0
Megalosaurid In reply to Dennonyx [2014-01-09 20:12:25 +0000 UTC]
YouΒ΄re welcome!! your drawings are great!
π: 0 β©: 0
terencethet-rex In reply to daisaspy [2013-12-14 20:07:07 +0000 UTC]
All i know is its inconclusive but the evidence leans toward Nanotyrannus being a teenage T-Rex
π: 0 β©: 1
daisaspy In reply to terencethet-rex [2013-12-14 20:29:13 +0000 UTC]
It's not inconclusive, and there's no evidence leans towards Nanotyrannus being a teenage T.rex.
π: 0 β©: 1
terencethet-rex In reply to daisaspy [2013-12-14 20:33:06 +0000 UTC]
Well theres no evidence to say its a separate species
π: 0 β©: 1
daisaspy In reply to terencethet-rex [2013-12-14 20:34:51 +0000 UTC]
Yes there is.
1. Skull. Look at it, different from any other juvenile T.rex found.
2. Montana's dueling dinosaurs indicates a animal about as large as 10 m, and seeing as the holotype for Nano was a juvy, it could well be an adult Nano.
π: 0 β©: 1
terencethet-rex In reply to daisaspy [2013-12-14 20:37:48 +0000 UTC]
But also the skull of Nano T. isn't fully developed. Scientists saw so many similarities between it and a teenage T-Rex
π: 0 β©: 1
daisaspy In reply to terencethet-rex [2013-12-14 20:41:08 +0000 UTC]
Oh silly me, I forget to mention the Montana Dueling Dinos fossil.
Oh wait, I did.
I also pointed out the holotype was a juvenile anyway, and there's barely any resemblance to juvy Rexes anyway.
π: 0 β©: 1
terencethet-rex In reply to daisaspy [2013-12-14 21:18:00 +0000 UTC]
So tell me then ,since u think u know more than me, what does a juvenile T-Rex look like?
π: 0 β©: 1
daisaspy In reply to terencethet-rex [2013-12-14 21:22:59 +0000 UTC]
I never said I knew more than you.
Clicky here for Nanotyrannus's holotype.
π: 0 β©: 1
terencethet-rex In reply to daisaspy [2013-12-14 21:24:51 +0000 UTC]
U didnt answer my question
π: 0 β©: 1
daisaspy In reply to terencethet-rex [2013-12-14 21:26:32 +0000 UTC]
Yes I did. I showed you a picture, didn't I?
π: 0 β©: 1
terencethet-rex In reply to daisaspy [2013-12-14 21:29:16 +0000 UTC]
That doesnt answer a damn thing.
π: 0 β©: 1
daisaspy In reply to terencethet-rex [2013-12-14 21:42:01 +0000 UTC]
You said, 'Show me a juvenile T.rex.'
Alright, I showed you Jane. She's a juvenile T.rex.
Is there something else you were asking?
π: 0 β©: 1
terencethet-rex In reply to daisaspy [2013-12-14 21:46:04 +0000 UTC]
I thought you said you believe Jane was a Nano T.
π: 0 β©: 1
daisaspy In reply to terencethet-rex [2013-12-14 21:47:16 +0000 UTC]
Oh no, I never said that.
π: 0 β©: 1
terencethet-rex In reply to daisaspy [2013-12-14 21:49:05 +0000 UTC]
But I think the Cleveland skull is also a young Rex
π: 0 β©: 1
daisaspy In reply to terencethet-rex [2013-12-14 21:50:59 +0000 UTC]
The Cleveland skull is the Nanotyrannus holotype.
π: 0 β©: 1
terencethet-rex In reply to daisaspy [2013-12-14 21:52:37 +0000 UTC]
I don't believe Nanotyrannus is a separate species
π: 0 β©: 1
daisaspy In reply to terencethet-rex [2013-12-14 21:53:24 +0000 UTC]
I'd like your evidence please.
π: 0 β©: 1
terencethet-rex In reply to daisaspy [2013-12-14 22:03:35 +0000 UTC]
The skull of Jane and the one in Cleveland are practically the same
π: 0 β©: 1
daisaspy In reply to terencethet-rex [2013-12-14 22:07:00 +0000 UTC]
Not really. They're both the same age, and Jane's fenestrae is larger, her skull slightly boxier too.
π: 0 β©: 1
terencethet-rex In reply to daisaspy [2013-12-14 22:10:35 +0000 UTC]
Did u ever think that sexual dimorphism came into play at any time?
π: 0 β©: 1
daisaspy In reply to terencethet-rex [2013-12-14 22:12:01 +0000 UTC]
How can we be sure? The only dinosaur specimen we know of it's gender is B-rex, and she's only 10 years old.
π: 0 β©: 1
terencethet-rex In reply to daisaspy [2013-12-14 22:15:51 +0000 UTC]
Maybe jane just grew bigger. The paradox being there coud be 2 men, both 40 years old. But one is 6 feet tall the other is 5 foot 8. The same couldve been true for Jane and the Cleveland skull
π: 0 β©: 1
daisaspy In reply to terencethet-rex [2013-12-14 22:18:51 +0000 UTC]
They're both the same size.
π: 0 β©: 1
terencethet-rex In reply to daisaspy [2013-12-14 22:36:09 +0000 UTC]
U said Jane is larger
π: 0 β©: 1
daisaspy In reply to terencethet-rex [2013-12-14 22:50:27 +0000 UTC]
Don't recall that.
Either way, must've been a typo.
π: 0 β©: 1
Dennonyx In reply to terencethet-rex [2013-12-15 19:15:34 +0000 UTC]
For both of you:
theropoddatabase.blogspot.it/2β¦
tyrannosauroideacentral.blogspβ¦
theropoda.blogspot.it/2009/05/β¦
π: 0 β©: 1
terencethet-rex In reply to Dennonyx [2013-12-15 19:30:22 +0000 UTC]
No offense : but u dont have a dog in this fight
π: 0 β©: 0
TheArchosaurQueen [2013-10-10 21:37:35 +0000 UTC]
Sinotyrannus is no longer aΒ Tyrannosauroidea ,Β and is more closely related to Sinraptor dongi.
π: 0 β©: 2
RickRaptor105 In reply to TheArchosaurQueen [2013-10-11 13:35:28 +0000 UTC]
Wait wait, since when is Sinotyrannus a carnosaur? Any links to back that up?
π: 0 β©: 1
TheArchosaurQueen In reply to RickRaptor105 [2013-10-11 16:39:14 +0000 UTC]
Its a really good thing you asked me, because I just noticed that I confused it forΒ Siamotyrannus for some stupid reason.
π: 0 β©: 1
DinoBirdMan In reply to TheArchosaurQueen [2013-10-12 19:49:28 +0000 UTC]
It means this one is lying all the long.
π: 0 β©: 1
Dennonyx In reply to TheArchosaurQueen [2013-10-11 11:00:45 +0000 UTC]
Thanks, I didn't notice that!Β
π: 0 β©: 1
TheArchosaurQueen In reply to Dennonyx [2013-10-11 16:40:22 +0000 UTC]
Forget what I said, I got it confused for Siamotyrannus for some stupid reason @-@. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siamotyr⦠.
π: 0 β©: 1
Dennonyx In reply to TheArchosaurQueen [2013-10-11 17:02:12 +0000 UTC]
Ah here. It seemed strange to me that I did not knew... xDΒ Β
π: 0 β©: 1
TheArchosaurQueen In reply to Dennonyx [2013-10-11 17:13:20 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, mistakes happen.
π: 0 β©: 0