HOME | DD

DizzyDenX [2006-08-11 02:52:43 +0000 UTC]

My fav would be the top-left. Where it looks half-sunk. But they're all very good anyways!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ivelt [2006-05-13 12:12:34 +0000 UTC]

I must say, I like the colours a great deal. But I would like too see them with a glossy feel, give them depth. Like here: [link] and [link] This is good in bigger sized logos like those you have up there^^ When scaling them down you can then erase the glossy parts to make them simple, which is good when making small logos. But I do like them all, shapes and fonts are very good! Good, good job!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

daynauthX [2006-04-20 15:50:09 +0000 UTC]

really good job on these, i especially love from row 4 down

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mangatobbey [2006-04-19 16:07:46 +0000 UTC]

hey m8 .. youve got some interesting logos here but you must think of the size of them .. some letters wil lbe unreadable after you make the logo smaller .. thats a pain in the ass ..

the top left picture , the shading is to weak , it vould be fine in grey or black light but on white it doesent show that well , the letter P is turining out O when the shading is to weak ,, also trye to tweak the shade so its a little longer maybe .. just an suggestion ..

the fourth logo from the left is to messy m it took me some time before I could read it .. and thats not something you want if the "customer" only have a look at the logo for 3 secs .. if ya know what i mean .. easy and cool is often better .. but its hard to make though ..

the bottom left logo , the D is to vague .. make it a little more blue

the blurry picture , the one fourth from the right , i blame that on Photoshop too .. you must be very carefull in PS .. dont enlarge images to much because its not vector based , like illustrator is .. and ive often ruined works after rezising them in photoshop .. therefore i no longer work in small workspaces , i minimum hava a area of 2000x2000 pxls when i do my stuff .. then i can make it smaller later on

Besides the critics, you have done a realy good job here m8 , and im onlu telling you these things to shear my view of things , ut may be wrong and it may not be the way you see it so dont give up

my favourite of this logos , is the picture at the right bottom , dM logo .Simple and easy to recognize

thumbs up for these pictures

cheers =mangatobbey

PS: sorry for my bad english ...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Akakaze [2006-04-19 02:42:53 +0000 UTC]

Nice! There some pretty sharp looking logos you got there! Hey, would you mind if i added this to the gallery at ? We are a group that revolves around symbols and logos and that would, i think, make a great addition ^^ All credit goes back to the owner and creator of the graphic of course and I'm sure it's bound to draw some pageviews for ya as well

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

binth [2006-04-16 01:39:51 +0000 UTC]

The one who is killing all the logos (imo) is the the last one, right part, is freaking awsome. The two letters looks really good one normal, and the other in caps, fits great, the best of this is that in your portfolio or in whatever you are going to do you can personalize them with the logo sahpes and all, dunno if you know what i'm talking about.

The one with a silhouette, will look better without it, the text like design, studios and well madray can go right down the logo like a normal text, but dunno how it will look like.

The 3rd one, from right, is really good too, no much to add to this, kinda the best, that font is awsome man, but my choice is the one i mentioned first

Top notch Work.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

gri3fon [2006-04-15 22:33:40 +0000 UTC]

um the top left. dont have any pointer but it the logo still look kewl on black and white it means the logo is good.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

duhcoolies [2006-04-15 17:34:42 +0000 UTC]

i like the the 1st one in row 1, 1st one in row 2, and 2nd one in row 3.
but u still need to tweak them up though

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DusteDev [2006-04-15 17:07:38 +0000 UTC]

Row 1, Left - This is fucking awesome!
Row 1, Right - The d at the front looks weird.
Row 2, Left - 'designs' and 'madray' are difficult to read.
Row 2, Right - Bad use of fonts (sans serif with grunge/splatter? Big nono)
Row 3, Left - People could read it as depthsniks.
Row 3, Right - Niiiiice!
Row 4, Left - That d looks 'rounded'.
Row 4, Right - Way too blurred.
Row 5, Left - People could read it as sniksdepth.
Row 5, Right - No, just no.
Row 6, Left - Make it less-blurred, and this'll be tight.
Row 6, Right - Sharpen it up, and it'll be sweet.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

bornghost [2006-04-15 16:18:29 +0000 UTC]

Very cool, though a few seem a bit too blurred. You made a good selection when it came to the type faces, and the backing designs to the text are nice too.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1